ML19317F124
| ML19317F124 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 03/14/1974 |
| From: | Houston R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Schwencer A US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001080821 | |
| Download: ML19317F124 (3) | |
Text
Dociet Re
,/
MAR 14 y4 Docket tios. 50-269/270/287 i
A. Schwencer, Chief. LWR 2-3. L SPECIAL REVIEW ASSIG'iMEtiT, OCollEE tiUCLEAR STATION, UtilTS 1, 2, & 3, REVIEW Of IllDUSTRIAL SECURITY PLAN Licensee:
Duke Power Co.
Licensing Stage: Post-OL Cognizant Project Branch and LPM:
LWR 2-3, I. A. Peltier Technical Review Branch Involved:
L:0SB Review Status: Additional Infonaation Requested The attached draft letter contains infonnation relative to updating j
of the subject Industrial Security Plan for transmittal to the licensee.
ewed as=8 **
g, w Ha"**
R. Wayne Houston, Chief Operational Safety Branch Directorate of Licensing.
Enclosure:
As stated I
cc:
S. Hanauer J. llendrie A. Giambusso W. Mcdonald V. Stello V. tioore I. A. Peltier C. Van tiiel DISTRIBUTION:
Docket, L Rdg OSB Rdg.
f OffH:t>
f' I
l( M #
Rh51:ld RMskNn sun..a*
3/14/74
'3ff'$74 o.u,
~
i - ma..
l q
o.
8001080 k/
/
Gentlemen:
In June 1973, the Commission published Regulatory Guide 1.17 " Protection of Nuclear Power Plants Against Industrial Sabotage", and on flovember 6, 1973, adopted amendments to its regulations in 10 CFR Parts 50, 70, and 73 to strengthen the physical protection of plants and materials.
The new rules required, in part, that licensees authorized to operate production and utilization facilities submit a physical security plan to the Commission by January 7,1974, if such a plan, as described in the new 10CFR50.34(c),
had not been submitted by flovember 6,1973.
t Although the docket record for your facility reflects submittal and review s
by the staff of a security plan, we consider it necessary at this time that you re-evaluate your security plan with respect to the regulations and the regulatory position set forth in Regulatory Guide 1.17.
In our letter to you dated February 7,1974, we transmitted to you our request for additional information along with our position on certain matters.
The staff considers that all nuclear power plants licensed pursuant to 10CFR50 should have or upgrade if necessary, physical security plans to conform at minimum, with Regulatory Guide 1.17.
You are asked, therefore, to submit within 30 days of receipt of this letter, the results of your re-evaluation, which should include, if necessary, amendments to your security plan on the docket record, or a revised plan, in sufficient detail to permit the staff to determine its conformance with Regulatory Guide 1.17.
The information to be submitted should also identify specific features of your plan which have not yet been implemented, if any, or cannot be implemented by April 15, 1974, and i
l L_.
i
r j,
provide best estimates of the date or dates when such implementation is expected.
If any of these dates extend beyond June 15,1974, the information provided should include a description of interim measures to be taken to provide compensating protection for such temporary periods.
Your letter of Three. copies of your response should be submitted.
transmittal should request that details of your security plan be i
withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Section 2.790 of 10 CFR Part 2.
Sincerely, 9
N
_{
.