ML19317F002
| ML19317F002 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 01/31/1974 |
| From: | Stello V US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Moore V US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001080701 | |
| Download: ML19317F002 (2) | |
Text
30Chet File JhN 31 1974 Docket Hos. 50-269/270/287 Voss A. Moore, Assistant Director for LWR's Gmup 2, L RESPONSE TO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REQUEST, OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2, & 3, REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL SECURITY PLAN (ORB-1-70)(TAR-769)
Licensee: Duke Power Co.
Licensing Stage: Post-OL Cognizant Project Branch and LPM: LWR 2-3, I. A. Peltier Technical Review Branch Involved: L:0SB Requested Completion Date:
3/1/74 Review Status: Additional Infomation Requested We have reviewed the security plan for the Oconee Station submitted by the licensee by letter dated January 10, 1974, pursuant to the require-ments of 10CFR50.54(q). The attached report contains infomation requests relative to our review for transmittal to the licensee.
In addition, the licensee should be advised that 1) his security plan should confom to the regulatory position set forth in Regulatory Guide 1.17 of June 1973, and 2) that the additional infonnation requested
-should be submitted as a revision to the security plan. Note that the enclosed infomation requests have,resulted from the review of a document-considered by the licensee as subject to Section 2.790 of 10CFR2.
Original Signeg Victor Stello Victor Stello, Jr., Assistant Director for Reactor Safety Directorate of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated DISTRIBUTION: Docket, L Rdg., 0SB Rdg.,
Hanauer Elva Leins J. Hendrie V. Stello A. Giambusso W. Mcdonald A. Schwencer I. A. Peltier R. W. Houston C. R. Van Niel S. Varga
/
L:0SBg L:0S87p,{ L:p0(:/tS RdtiguhWnt VStIlllo' e 7
CRyad'f44f:ld 1/3D774 1/3__J_/74 1/3l/74 $
o.n anc.m in sn ancu on.
- ca ** * **** ~
8=o8o7f/p
D e
Oconj:e Maclear Station, !! nits 1, 2, 7.
Docket Hos. 50-269/270/237 Industrial Security Plan Although the Plan states that firearms will be 1.
the security guards are arned.
be armed.
Do tha security alarms annunciate in a second conti 2.
It is our position that all security alarns annunciate in station?
house.
two continuously manned stations.
Are all alarms self-checking and tamper-indicating?
3.
Is the perimeter of die Controlled Area marked by signs as specified 4.
in ANSI N18.17 at Section 3.27 The Plot Plan, Enclosure 2, does not show the guard house or the protected area fence line extending from the west side of thethat a d 5.
It appear Please revise the Administration Building.
is shown in the FSAR, Figure 12-6, Revision 8.
figuras to reflect the present situation.
Indicata on the Plot Plan the location of the parking lot.
6.
Specify that visitors will be required to register the specific infor. ation listed in.ViSI N18.17 at Section 3.3.2.1.
7.
m It does not appear that Table II-l is complete; the legend on page 11-1-5 contains unused entries and no doors with intrusion 3.
Provide a listing of those dacrs or areas alarns are identi fied.where intrusion alarus are installed (Reference and Part II, Section 1.0).
Identify tne material scheduled for insertion in Enclosure 3, and 9.
its expected date of availability.
h D-
- w..