ML19317E516
| ML19317E516 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 06/16/1967 |
| From: | Shaw M US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Morris P US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19317E517 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912180749 | |
| Download: ML19317E516 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
i
- ~
' ~
. u. >
.a v.
Me JJNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
_g n.
.)
'Memorand
-l -
IA~
um
' /~
TO Peter A. Morris, Director Division of Reactor Licensing DATE:
J{jN 16 1967 FROM : Milton Shaw, Director \\I'S" Division of Reactor Devt:lopment & Technology
SUBJECT:
IIAZARDS
SUMMARY
REPORT RDT:NS:S198 Reference is made to the letter of May 31, 1967, from your Division to the Environmental Science Services Administration requesting comments on the following safety analysis report:
Oconee Nuclear Station Units 1, 2 and 3 Duke Power Company Preliminary Safety Analysis Report Amendment #4 dated May 25, 1967 l
Review by the Environmental Meteorology Branch, Air Resources Laboratory ESSA, has now been completed and their comments are attached.
At tachment:
Comments (Orig. and 1 cy.)
I 1
79121807hf L
n., u.s. s.,i,, n.a, w a.,1,.aa.,,.n s.,i,ai..,
s p,y
t e
Comments on Oconee Nuclear Station Units 1, 2 and 3 Duke Power Company Preliminary Safety
- Analysis Report Amendment #4 dated May 25, 1967 Prepared by Environmental Meteorology Branch Institute for Atmospheric Sciences June 9, 1967 It is noted that the amendment offers a second meteorological dif fusion model based on confined valley drainage under inversion
)
conditions. It is our opinion that this second model, which is identical to the valley confinement assumption in our comments of t
May 3,1967, is more realistic and is appropriately conservative.
e I
f
\\
c2 /43 l
l