ML19317E192

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Order Granting Request for Motion to Reconsider Order
ML19317E192
Person / Time
Site: Oconee, Mcguire, McGuire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/24/1973
From: Bennett W K
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML19317E191 List:
References
NUDOCS 7912170429
Download: ML19317E192 (3)


Text

_.

~

s 1%

I \\

,e

~%

,~,f f

UNITED STATES OF A31 ERICA

~ ' '

ATOi!IC 1:NERGY CO3D1ISSION O

y In the !!atter of

)

Docket Nos. 50-269A

)

50-270A DUKE POWER CO31PANY

)

50-287A

)

50-369A (Oconee Units 1, 2, and 3;

)

50-370A LIcGuire Units 1 and 2)

)

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST I?OR tiOTION

'IO RECONSIDER ORDER This Board denied a motion to quash subpoenas issued on behalf of the Department of Ju'stice on condition that the Department write a letter specifying the persons to and from whom the documents desired were 4

written among other matters and reduced the time from t[

~

f oEty.(db),~ to ten ~ (10) yea'rs.*,

~

The respresentative of the Del >artment has written

^

a letter to this Board, with appropriate distribution, declaring that..it was impossible to fulfill the l

conditions specified and indica tin;; a desire for I

reconsideration.

l

Treating said le tter as a motion for reconsidera tion, i

i the Board will take the matter under consideration under the conditions specified.

l l

l 7912170kg7

" 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1)

The letter of the Department of Justice, dated January 15, 1973, and addressed to the Chairman of this Board will I;3 treated as a motion for reconsidera tion ;

(2)

The Department shall file and serve within fifteen (15) days in support thereof an affidavit showing that it hal reason to believe that the parties subpoenaed had documents as specified, that according to its informa tion such documents ei ther.were internal

  • 9.. '

unemoranda disti ibuted. among.cffic,ers 'of dh'c -corporn t. ion (or ocher persons) (specify the class) or.vcero correspondence l

between the corporation and one or more classes of I

persons (specify such classes by description) and denying tnat it as engaged in a " fishing c::pediti'on".

In the alternative, the Departnent may e. plain why it x

cannot supply such information; (3)

The parties subpoenaed shall have fif teen (15) days thercaf ter to respond by af fidavit specifying f acts l

L l

1

?

l

~ -. _ _.

.s

?

  • t., k-

\\

6 NN N,

}

~....

4 l

d 4

l which mahc it impossible to comply with such e 2bpoena without undue burden or giving other factual reasons why the cotion should be denied.

Ti1E ATOMIC SM*ETY AND LICENSING E0ARD

'1 i

V W

a1.wrk'V,.AS.~,..,i j

/

Vialter i!N. Benne tt, jhairman i

l l

Issued at Tiashington, D.

C.,

19'73.

this 24th day of January, I

~

. 's..

- * ~

1

=

t

(

~

..~

i

/*

.a=*

D I

l 1

.