ML19317E113

Summary of AEC 660114 Meeting W/Util Re Economics & Location of Potential Power Plants

ML19317E113
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	01/17/1966
From:	Newell J US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 7912130825
Download: ML19317E113 (2)

Text

_

e so.>-.a 3,.a.,.

... e o

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum To Files DATE:

g, G.

4 J. ht it lef, Site-FROM Env'lfonmentalBranch,DRL gb" b[

h

SUBJECT:

MEETING WITH DUKE.N COMPANY Representatives of Duke Power Company met with the Regulatory Staff on January 14, 1966, in Dr. Beck's Office. The following individuals attended:

Duke Power Comoany U.S.A.E.C.

Edward Fiss H. L. Price (part time)

L. C. Dail C. K. Beck R. L. Coan M. M. Mann (part time)

R. S. Boyd J. F. Newell To meet growing power demands in South Carolina, Duke Power Company is evaluating the economics of a nuclear vs. fossil fuel power plant in the 600-750 !!we range to be in operation in 1970 to be followed up by a second plant of identical design to be in operation by 1971. They are considering two sites for such a plant, one on the Savannah River about 8 miles downstream of the Hartwell Reservoir and the other at Keowee about 12 miles north of Clemson, both of which are remote from population.

Assuming that economics m uld dictate construction of nuclear power Mr. Fiss stated that Duke Power Company would request a preliminary site review, possibly on both sites. The reactor plant would be either of pressuri::ed or boiling water design. Duke would plan to submit an application for construction of two reactor plants (similar to Florida) in late 1966 and would desire a construction permit by July 1967 in 1

order to have the first plant completed and on line by 1970.

The contents of a site evaluation report was briefly discussed.

In this 1

regard Mr. Fiss asked if we would look over for suitability of contents a draft copy of a site report Duke had prepared for another site. Mr. Fiss stated that he would call me in about two weeks to obtain my reaction as to whether a site evaluation report covering these contents would be adequate for a preliminary site review.

'.r' i

f Buy l].S. Satings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Satings Plan f

a 7912130 k b f$

2-4 Copies of the proposed design criteria and of the news release l

concerning J.CRS Recomendations on Nuclear Power Plant design were Siven to Mr. Fiss.

ec:

H. L. Price i

C. K. Beck l~

M. M. Mann j

R. L. Doan

2. G. Case l

R. S. Boyd 4

i l

s 4

Tjh.'M. m p 4 "! '7 qp

~- r

,liSI li: d ijf U uu,G UU N d o f_

d Files u

1:33 J. F.

'evell, ~hief, 3ite-Environmental aranch, ML M".ET!".C *.'I*H C'%Z ?M.R :D t?.GY Representatives of Ouke Power Cowany eset with the "etuistory itsff on January li, IVA, in Sr. Beck's Cf fice. The followins; individuais attendedt

%ka % er % w M,t.?,c, Edvard Fiss

3. L. Price (part t1w)

L. C. Dail

0. K. Beck P.. L. 2oevs

s. M. Vann (part t!N )

t. 3cyd J. F. 7ewell To :reet crowing we desonds in South Caro'Ine, hke ?over Co coeny is evatusting the economics of a nuclear vs. fossil fuel.mr plant in the 600-750 Ne range to be in ooeration in 1970 to be followed up 5y a second plant of identical design to be in operation by 1971. They are censidering two sites for such a plant, one on the invennah alver about 3 miles downstrees of the Hartwell Reservoir and the other a C Teovee about 12 miles north of Clemeen, bnth of which are remote f rors population.

tasuming that eea m ics would dictate construction of nuclent m er N. Fina stated that Duke ?ower Coneany would recuest a preliminere site review, oossibly on both sites. The reactor plant would

~,e either of pressurized or boiling water design.

Luke would plan to suhit on mon 11 cation for construction of two reactor plants (sistlar to :1crida) in late tv-6 and amid desire a construction eersit by July IM7 in order to have the first plant completed and en line by 1970.

The contents of a site evaluation resort was briefly discussed. In this regard vr. Fiss asked if we weeld leek ever for suitability of contentan a draf t copy of a site report Duke had prepared for another site.

Mr. Fiss stated that he would call me in abeet too weska te obtala wy reaction as ta whether a site evaluation report covering these contents would be adeqeste for a preliminary site review.

RD-P R w.

CFTICE >

SURNAME >

y DATE >.........

Ibrm AEC.318 (E.r.1Hi3)

u. a. oovusencar ressene. orrma to-artet-a t

2-Cooles of the proposed.hstas critaria and of the news relasse concerniat AC3:4 Recommendations se haclear n'ower 'lant des 12a wre 31ven to.*r. fins.

cet

!!. L. / rice C. K. 5eck

4. M. FLm

2. I.. Coa.

I. C. Case

1. 5. Soyd gWpil[U'

-gM; Toy q r b _a t..

l l

omer >

SURNAME >

DATE >...............

Fbrm AEC.318 (Rev. 943)

u. s. sovspassat eniame orrics to-eTrot-s