ML19316A633

Forwards Request for Addl Info Required from Util Re Initial Tests & Operation,Startup Rept Submittal,Tech Specs & Conduct of Operations for FSAR Review

ML19316A633
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	04/12/1972
From:	Van Niel C US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Peltier I US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8001130153
Download: ML19316A633 (5)

Text

LA ps}[un.

(b 'l h s

!?R 12 nn 4

~

i e

l I. A. Peltier, PiB Eranch f4, DEL TiWJ:

D. Thecpcca, Chief, 053, D E IEVIIM OF FINAL SAFLTY A?IALYSIS REPORT FOR Til5 OC0;id ITJCLEAR STATION U'iITS 2 & 3 (DOCKLT UOS.

50-270 & $0-237)

I have conducte.1 a review of the FSAR cf the above epplicant in the cres of Initial Tests ani Operation. The encloture identifica the aliitional inforention that vill be required of the applicant in onier to cccplete the review in these areas.

[-/C. R. Van Niel Cperational Safety Branch, DRL

Enclosure:

A111tional Inforcation Requested cc:

D. J. Skovholt, DRL A. Sclr.rencer, DE

~

D *

• lD *D'Tl

. m M oll

. 1 h Nf m

I *pr-$

....,.h b..........bbE b

?

CFTICE >

r p

Oh f

. b (- -( 5-

..b i

SURNAWT >

i+/.12/. 7. 2...

/-12./72 h

DATE>

(

Tone ATC-SIS (Rev. 9-53) A f CM 0240 o u r,covta*ut=t p e u o8*ct 167 t a t e -4e s 001130 / I)

(

^

Oconee 2 & 3 Chapter 13 - Initial Te ts and Operation s

Section 1332 What additional prestartup checr'.s plier to initial criticality will be performed, eg. hydrostatic tests, water quality tests, calibration of source range monitors, and vibration tests?

13.4.2 Expand the list of power escalation tests that will i

be performed.

Designate the power levels at which each test will be conducted.

I i

l b.

l l

i

6.6.3.7 Will a Startup Report be subtsitted, which sua:urizes 4

plant startup and pever ascension testing and the evaluation of the results of these test prograss.

(not reported as special reports)?

Please proviue resumes for all individuals selected for the positions of shift supervisor and assistant shift :,upervicor. ::ote also that an Industrial Security Plan, :cvering the entire 0.once site, should be subtaitted fer review. This Plan vill be required prior to the issuance of en opereting licence for Unit 1.

At the Feburary 10 meeting, the applicant aantioned the security review perforned of pcVer facilities by the U.S. Aray Provost Ihrshal's Office. Their review is not inconsistent or at variance with AEC requircuents.

O G

t f

f 9

s

'\\

j l

l

.. ~

1 I

i 12A-6 At the present time, how many nuclear engineers, and nochanical ens ncers with nuclear training and experience i

are employed in the !bchanical Engineering Section.

Oconee 2 & 3 - Chapter 15 i

t Technical Specifications Section l

1 i

1.8 The definition of Abnormal Occurrence is not in agree-l aent with that fcund in proposed standard ANS 3 2 and i

Safety Guide 16. For exaaple, conditions arrIsing from j

natural or offsite events, and conditions that cause a safety limit to be exceeded are not addressed.

6.1.1.4 The acaning of the second sentence of this specification is unclear. The minir:uts crew size fer unit 1 is the nutiber needed to safety operate the plent.

Cperating personnel for units 2 and 3 could assist in unit 1 operations for training purposes.

6.1.2.1 Are written charters provided for the Station Review Coaaittee and the General Office Review Committee?

6.1.2.2.d.

Will the ceneral office Re iew Committee review and v

approve Station Review Comsittee meeting minutes?

i i

6.1.1 7 Provide a coalitaent that (1) a licensed senior operatcr shall be in direct charge of any refuelin.; operation, and (2) an cparator or technician, qualified in radiatica protectica procedures, shall be. a seaber of each shift.

Table 6.1-1 Expand the table er provide a separate table to shev minimum cperating shift requirements for 2-and 3-unit i

l operation.

F 6.4.1 Will written detailed precedures be provided for surveillance and testin$ activities?

6 5(j)

Do the records of radioactive vaste disposal include routine releases to the environment?

6.6.4.5 Will the reporting of effluent releases be summarized on a acnthly basis? Will dissclved gas radioactivity be included in the report?

l

\\

\\

i s

1 1

-,-_m

_m

7_ __

~

i Oconce 2 & 3 - Chapter 12

}

Conduct of Operations i

Section f-I 12.1.2 5 Expand the job descriptiens of the Shift Superviscr and i

and the f.ssistant Shift Supervisor to describe their responsi-12.1.2.6 bilities during 2 and 3 unit eperation 12.2 The minimum qualifications listed for the key supervisory i

~

pcsitions do not meet the minimum requircaents as i

specified in ANSI H18.1 - 1971. Justify.

~

12 3 what provisions have been made for the review of both cperating and emerEency procedures by the operating g

crew during the life of the plant, to enh9 ace operator proficinecy?

12 3 2.2 Are the agreenents in writing with those offsite and organizations who vill be called upon to perform 12 3 2 3(c) energency functions er services?

j 12 3 2 3(e) what is weant by "periodie" in relation to emergency drills for the training of plant perscnnel? At what i

. frequency vill simulated drills involving offsite agencies be conducted?

i 12 3 2 7 2 The doces listed for initiation of protective uensures for people in the low population sene are hi her than E

ve believe appropriate. We suggest that you consider 2 5R for external expcaure cni 5CC XMFC for internal exposure as pcssible actica levels fer notification of off-site support groups.

12 5 Define " periodically" (1) regarding plant operations I

review by the station review cow.nittee, and (2) regarding the audit of station operations by the GCRO.

=

Figure 12 kB The shift ccaplement for 2 & 3 unit operation is not acceptable.

See the letter from P. A. Morris to Duke Power Co., dated 2/13/70.

i l

FiEure 12-4B where docs the Staff Engineer (see paEe 12A-6) fit in the station organizatien?

1 l

Y;

• s a

_. _,.