ML19312C905

Forwards Supplemental Environ Rept.W/O Encl.Also Forwards 711018 Request for Issuance of OL Authorizing Limited Power Operations & 711018 Statement by Applicant Why CPs Should Not Be Suspended

ML19312C905
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	10/18/1971
From:	Thies A DUKE POWER CO.
To:	Morris P US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML19312C906	List: ML19312C905 ML19312C912 ML19312C916
References
NUDOCS 8001140570
Download: ML19312C905 (4)

Text

'

~^ eno g %, oarE er occuwEun oarsesenvEn == _

l Charlotta, North Carolir 28291 1s-18 71 l'1 1 71 4516 A. C. Thies YQr. ,

O R6G CC OTH ER:

l 1 signed & 299 conf'd Dr. Morris acnow nscessanT concuanEucE O oarE ^~swEaso:

CLAS$1F; no menou arctss># .

co==E~T O .

m .

I POS T OFFICE F4LE GOQE; / \

U

=co ~o- .) 50-269 50-270 50-287 Msare-ROJR,E)J - -

DESCRIPYlON; (Must 8g ynciallafaed) TO DATE RECENED BY DATE Ltr submitting ptsrsuant to App "D" _

Sec. A, C, D & E . . .trans the followirig SEE ATTACHED DISTRIBUT[CE:

i t EnGLosu nEs;

(1) Req for Issuance of OPR LIC for

, Oconee Unit # i to auth limited

} operation up to 201 full power w/atclurt

, App "A" -Sttuary of Operations.

(2) Statement re Sec. "E", Rev. App '

"D" ra S11CW CAUSE why Coast. Permit ,~

~ '

', ~ ,

., should not be suspended for Units 2 & :l. 6 *

,. l

'D)""* Suppi to Enviro Quality Features , , , .

8 ","'"**~~ "..gj

! of Ecowee-Toxeysy Project.(Enviro Epth b, > * /'

Holding (16) cys for ACES t 000 era ea enc 1 rec'd) 4516 fed -

g u.s. ATouac ENmov couuiss' " M All CONTROL. FORM roa= *Ec.nos '

@ V.5, G O V E RNMEN T P RIN TIN O O F Ft C E: 1971.d24 462 18-408 80011407 6

SCHWENCER W/4 cys for ACTION (Req for Opr Lic & Show Cause)

G. BLANC W/2 cys for ACTION (ENVIRO RPT SUPPL)

DISTRIEUTION: '

--3>': Reg Files (ltr only 50-270/287) J. Totter, DBM, E-201 GT AEC PDR(Itr only 50-270/287)

J. DiNunno. A-170, GT l Compliance (2) W. Williams, RDT, F-309 GT OGC, Rm P 506A S. Levine, A-170, GT Boyd/ Grimes (Task Force SHOW CAUSE) DeYoung 1

Henderson DTIE(Laughlin) '

Beck /Mann Felton NSIC(Buchanan)

Klecker Dube/Wsteen Dromerick Morris /Schroeder/T.R. Wilson Lange (2)

L. Rogers Pawlicki E. G. Case Minogue L. Johnson, SLR Moore Thornton l Rosen Denton (2) Collins Clare Miles, C-459, GT Thompson l

AEC HQ LIB J-004 i

Warren Nyer (2)

Chief Water Reactors, RDT GT Local PDR(Walhalla, S.C.) g (//

,,- o .

i y , - s ,- .

e DUKE POWER COMPANY Powzn Burr.orno 422 SouTu Caunca SrnerT, CnAar.oTTr, N. C. asao:

A C THIES , P. O. Box 2178 -

SamiOm vect PossictNr PeOCUCTION AND TM 4 N S he s SSiON October 18, 1971 y.d

,y.:' .

_ ~ ;-

/N s /

lb .

'G Dr. Peter A. Morris , Director /C ~

07': C  ?

Division of Reactor Licensing 7 L- .

Atomic Energy Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue

'C - R;,,

Bethesda, Maryland 1l. , ,qQ Re: Oconee Units a 3 Docket Nos. -2 70 and -2 87

Dear Dr. Morris,

In accordance with the requirements of Appendix D,10 CFR 50, Duke Power Company hereby submits its Supplemental Environmental Report on the Oconee Nuclear Station. This supplement provides the addi-tional information and technical justification required

1. By Sections A. , C. and D. for Oconee Units 1, 2 and 3 to support issuance of full term operating licenses.

2. By Section D. 3. to support the issuance of an opera-ting license authorizing the loading of fuei and limited operation within the scope of Section 50.57(c),10 CFR 50, for Unit 1, pending completion of NEPA review, if such authcrization is necessary.

3. By Section E. to show cause why the construction permits for Units 2 and 3 should not be suspended, in whole or in part, pending completion of NEPA review.

Also enclosed is the Applicant's " Request for the Issuance of an Operating License Authorizing Limited Power Operations"on Oconee Unit 1, in the event the NEPA review has not been completed in time for the issuance of a full term operating license, making such special authorization necessary.

. 4515

Dr. Peter A. Morris Page 2 October 18, 1971 There is also enclosed the " Statement by the Applicant Why the Construction Permits Should Not be Suspended" for Oconee Units 2 and 3 pursuant to Section E. , Appendix D,10 CFR 50.

These documents clearly substantiate that continued construction and operation will not give rise to any significant adverse impact on the environment but, rather, will enhance the environment and the quality of life in the surrounding area.

Yours very truly, l

l I

I i

, ~ ,. . ,. , - _ _ _ _ _ -