ML19312C744
| ML19312C744 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 08/08/1969 |
| From: | Morris P US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Beck C, Mann M, Price H US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912190955 | |
| Download: ML19312C744 (4) | |
Text
.
g AUG B 1969 Those Listed Below REVIEW PLAN - OCONEE STATION, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3, DUKE POWER COMPANY, DOCKET NO 50-269, 50-270, AND 50-237 A proposed review plan for the operating licenses for the Duke Power Company's Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 was discussed between representatives of RP, RT, and RO on July 17, 1969. The review plan, including assignments and schedula as agreed to at this meeting, is enclosed. Procedural and background notes applicable to this review are also enclosed.
The responsibility of this project has been assigned to Reactor Project Branch No. 3.
A. Schwancer has been assigned as project leader.
Original signed by F. Schroeder for Peter A. Morris, Director Division of Reactor Licensing
Enclosures:
1.
Background Notes 2.
Review Plan 3.
Schedule 4.
ACES Review Items Addressees:
Distribution H. L. Price Dockets (3)
C. K. Beck DR Reading M. M. Mann DRL Reading
- 2. L. Doan RPB-3 Reading F. Schroeder P. A. Morris R. S. Boyd S. 14 vine D. J. Skovbolt R. C. DeYoung RP Branch Chiefs RT Branch Chiefs 20 Branch Chiefs A. Schwencer D. F. Ross
_RPB-RL RPB-3/DRL RP/DRL
,/
,0%.
D omet >
y
'"*M
- i.,p
.?.
P' orb
' I'3 ~
/
Mff
'l
.A._........nc,e r,: p t _,,CG[ch[
RMBo)_.i*
,_ h,f. i su m ur>
7//[/69_
_ l7/'i/69 7,fM/,69,, _,,, k/ T(/69 om,
N'n Asces <nn. m
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,g,,_,,,,,,,,
7 912190 ff[ d
i 1
I l
ENCLOSURE 1 3ACKGROUND FOR DUKE (OCONEE) ?OL REVIEW 1
The Duke Power Cc=pany was issued Provisional Construction Per=its y
(C??R-33, -34, and -35) on Nove=ber 6,1967 follcwing our CP review of their PSn2 for Oconee Units 1, 2, and 3.
The following persons contrib-u:ed to the DRL review of these reactor units during the constructica or pos t-construction phases: 3rian Gri=es and Paul Check (overall project);
R. Waterfield (site =atters); S. Pawlicki (R?V and internals); F. Schauer J
(s tructural design) ; M. Fairtile (stea= line isolation); R. Ferguscn ld (electrical syste=s); and D. F. Sullivan (I.&C). New= ark and Hall contrib-
~
uted as consultants on s:ructural design =atters up through A=end=en: No.
-o.
On June 2,1969 the Duke ?cuer Co=pany sub=itted its FSAR for the Oconee Nuclear Units 1, 2, and 3 (Amend =ent No. 7 :o its application).
The projec:ed fuel loading date is Dece=ber 1970.
The Oconee Nuclear Units incorporate "first of a class" 35W-designed nuclear sten: supply syste=s.
Therefore, reviewers face first-ti=e reviews of final 3&W R&D efforts in =any areas. Nine B&W Topical Reports have been identified which =ust be evaluated as part of this ?OL review.
These eval-uations should be as fully docu=ented as practical so tha: they can be
'readily used in reviews on later B&W applications. A nu=ber of significant design revicions have been =ade.
They are listed on FSAR page 1-6 and include:
1.
The new 3&W canless fuel asse=bly.
2.
The new 3&W roller nut and leadscrew control rod drives.
3.
Use in Unit 3 of Unit-1 first-cycle fuel asse=llies.
4.
Inclusion of burnable poison rods in the first fuel cycle of Unit 2.
Inclosure 2 constitutes an initial appraisal of the effort that should be a:.: pended by DRL in the ne:tt IS =cnths on this project. A specific listing of all =a:ters : hat need DRL review cannot be co=pleted in advance of a de: ailed FSAR study, since a. specialized reading will be required to do this. The review will be a continuing study not wholly bounded by this initial plan.
on."
2nclosure 3 provides a tentative review schedule and Enclosure 4 identifies, consis ter'. with the initial review plan, how ACRS "a-p" ite=s v1111be handled as well as ite=s which appeared in the ACRS-CP letter on the Oconee S:acion.
Several Compliance reports have already been issued on the Oconee Station.
- ? will review all Co=pliance inspaction reports on Oconee, as they are
(;3 y
issued, and coordinate required DEL POL review action.
ENCLOSURE 3 REVIEW S'CHEDULE DUKE POL CCONEE UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 Application Filed.
June 2, 1969 Projected Fuel Loading. (Unit 1)
December 1, 1970 Cc==ercial Operation (Unit 1).
May 1971 Units 2 and 3 one and two years later, respectively.
DRL EFFORTS Review Plan Published.
July 21,'1969 Initial Meeting.
August 5,1969 Identification of FSAR Deficiencies from RT, R0, Consultants..
Septe=ber 26, 1969 Technical Meeting with Duke.
October 15, 1969 Initial Review of 36'4 Topical Reports.
Novedber 1,1969 Submit Information Request to DRL Management for Review and Approval.
Novenber 12, 1969 Release Infor=ation Request to Duke.
Novedber 26, 1969 Meeting with Duke on Topical Reports.
Decedber 10, 1969 Answers from Duke on First Information Request.
January 1970 Sub=it Additional Requests for Infor=ation (including information on topicals) for Manage-
=ent Raview and Approval..
March 1970 Release Additional Requests for Information to Duka March 1970 Addicicnal Answers i:c= Duke.
May 1970 1
Final Consultant Reports.
June 1970 i
RT, R0 Draf: Reports.
June 1970 Sub=it ACRS Report for Management Review an'd Approval.
July 1970 Transmit ACRS Report.
July.1970 ACRS Site Visit Subco==ittee Meeting.
August 1970 ACRS Meetings..
September, October 1970 Safety Evaluation.
November 1970 j
1
- 4 1
3-1 1
.1 l
j.
The applicant is investigating xenon-transient stability
]
nargins.
(3&W has a. topical report which RT will review.)
I j
k.
Consideration should.be given to i= proved weld inspections.
(RT will review as part of Chapter 5.
This ite= vas cleared-
+
up to the satisfaction of the staff at' the hearing.)
j 1.
The applicant should review design of the electrical pcwer to i
the reactor protection systens and safeguards protection systens with respect to independence of each unit from troublas in the others.
(RT will review this as part cui Chapters 7 and i
8.)
=.
Careful attention is necessary in the design and construction of the sub=arged earthen weir in Keowee Reservoir.
(This matter was settled during the, post-CP review.)
1 l
4 i
1 i
e d
9 4
.