ML19312C278
| ML19312C278 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 08/01/1967 |
| From: | Shapar H US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Doreen Turner JUSTICE, DEPT. OF, ATTORNEY GENERAL, OFFICE OF |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19312C273 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912120852 | |
| Download: ML19312C278 (1) | |
Text
.
i k
- j.
9-UNITED STATES
)
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 20545 r
s
<m o August 1, 1967 Honorable Donald P. Turner Assistant Attorecy Cencral Antitrust Division Washington, D. C.
20530 In the Matter of Duke Power Company l
Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287
Dear Mr. Turner:
Enclosed is a copy of a Protest of Piedmont Electric Citics Against Duke Power Company's Application for Unconditional Licenses Under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as a= ended, for Oconee Nuclear Station Units 1, 2 and 3, undated, which was filed with the Commission on July 25, 1967. The protest relates to an application to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commis-sion, dated November 28, 1966, and an amendment thereto, dated April 29, 1967, by the Duke Power Company for permits and licenses, under Section 104 b. of the Atomic Energy Act, to construct and operate three nucicar power reactors. The protest alleges that the unconditional licensca applied for by the Duke Power Company are not authorized in that they appear to violate or tend toward the violation of the antitrust laws, appear to restrain free competition in private enterprise, and would tend to create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws.
As soon as your Division has reviewed the protest, we would be pleased to meet at your convenience to discuss the matter.
Sincerely, Howard K. Shapar Assistant Cencral Counsel j
l' Licensing and Regulation 1
g cnclosure:
-As stated m
"'N.D 5
l