ML19312C121

Responds to AEC Re Insp Repts Conducted by Regulatory Operations Personnel at Util.Forwards Summary of Areas Considered Proprietary

ML19312C121
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	09/14/1972
From:	DUKE POWER CO.
To:	Jennifer Davis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19312C112	List: ML19312C111 ML19312C121
References
NUDOCS 7912040648
Download: ML19312C121 (5)

Text

--

.. ~.

!s 9

' Dune Powra GOMPANY PowEn Burz.orso

.i 422 sotml oHURCII STREET, CHARI&rrE.N. C. 20201 A. c'.Tnizs September 14, 1972 r.o.cox 2:2o 5,.o. m r..s.,,,

Pnoovction amt Taasssmessoas Mr. John G. Davis, Director i

U. S. Atomic Energy Commiss: ion i

230 Peachtree Street, N S,iSuite 818 l

Atlanta, Georgia

.30303 r

Dear Mr. Davis-

SUBJECT:

Fr~eedom of Information Act AEC Compliance Inspection and Inquiry Reports In your letter of August 25, 1972 you notified us that the AEC had been requested to furnisa reports of inspections and inquiries con-ducted by regulatory operations' personnel concerning our Oconee Although your letter is not specific on this Nuclear Station.

point, we understand that you intend to make the information avail-able to Mr. Townsend Belser, Counsel for the Carolina Environmental Study Group, as a result of his request for use in the pending pro-l ceeding involv.ing McGuire Nuclear Station.

i this matter has been the subject of discussion with l

As you know, Edward J. Bloch, Deputy Director of Regulation and others in his l'

office and res lted in our letter to him dated September 1,1972, A correction to one a copy.of whicP was sent to you on that date.

I am sure sentence was ra.ide in a letter dated September 5,1972.

that these letters make clear to you the basis of our objections to the releas.e of this information at this time because of the potential For this reason, I will not prejudice to the McGuire proceeding.

restate our position in this letter.

As stated in our letter to Mr. Bloch, Duke will not request that any r'

information pertaining to its operation be considered proprietary if the AEC does not agree with.our objections and. furnishes this to out-We have indicated in the marked-up copies of the side parties.

' Regulatory Operation Documents which were furnished with'your letter of August 25, areas which seven outside companies considered In addition, attached to this, letter is a summary of proprietary.

these proprietary areas and seme of the reasons why they are con-j l

sider,ed proprietary.

Finally, we realize that the' position of' the AEC on making informatica available pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act is one of general o

~At't'achdent A TRANSMITTED VIA FACSIMILE 79.12040 o

Irector 8

we hope that the na ngts we reques ted in '.our letter of ini nature of such repor.

to unders tanding.

ts in perg i

On a positive I

that the depth of revi assurance to the pub ew perfos as to g i

e i

BCt/ck i

J

~

1 7

t k

't

.f

.j ~

e i

j I

4 i

l l

e s

n m

j

-)

J 3

Mr. John G. Davis, Director Septemb'er 14, 1972 A ttachment l

The following pages are wit-hheld from public disclosure for the j

following reasons:

1) This information is normally considered confidential, between i

the vendor, customer, ~ hn'd Atomic ~ Energy' Commissibn.

2) The release of this information is considered proprietary and the disclosure to the public of this information may jeopardize,

j

• -the vendors. competitive position.

3) The informatiion as stated is incorrect.

This deletion will

. correct ~the. scatement.

4) These reports generally contain information related to the ri: vendor's manufacturing process, operations, style of work and,

--equipment which when given to the Atomic Energy Com:nission was to i

" be in confidenec.

B & W considered this information confidential l

r between the vendor, customer and Atomic Energy Commission, i

1

-" '- Page Number Rea' son Number i

}

1.

147 thru 167 4

2.

168 thru 180 4

i 3.

231 2

4 232 2

j 3

5 '. 233

~^

6.

238 2

7.

244-256 2

1-8.

271 9.

307 thru 316 4

10.

346 thru 361 4

11-430 1, 2

12. 431 1

13. 433 1

14. 480 2

15.

551

~

1

16. 552 1

j.

' :'" 17. -581 thru 596 4

t-18, 602 2

r-19.

605 2

20.

614 thru 617 4

4

- ' 21.

664 thru 667 22.

728 1

8 g

4,

g Os

+T I

fr. John G.' Davis, Director September 14, 1972 Reason Number l

Page Number 4

23.

744 thru 756 24.

797 thru 815 4

25.

853,

.l 1

26.

873' 27.

874 1

1 i

28.

875 l.

~~

29.-

876 J

30.

877 1

3.1.. 878 -

l'

.~

3'.

.929

.2 a

33..-

930 2-34.

1006 thru 1017

.4.-

35.

Inquiry Report May 3,1971

.. Exhibit A 2

j

\\

~~

l i.

'l g

2 f

.c a

t J

i i

DISTRIBUTION

~

Ltr fm Davis to Duke Power Company dated October 6,1972 1

H. D. i.ornburg, R0 4

j R. H. Engelken, R0 i

K. Shea, OGC R0 Files i

DR Central Files C C

PD8 Local PDR.

4 i

e i

i 1

i O

I I

i i

1 I

)

h a

1 I

i 4

~

. _, _. _, _ ~. - _.