ML19312B935

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Proposed Tech Spec 6 Re Technical Review & Control,& Independent Review & Audit in Response to RA Purple
ML19312B935
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/28/1975
From: Thies A
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Anthony Giambusso
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19312B936 List:
References
NUDOCS 7911270724
Download: ML19312B935 (4)


Text

'

NRC DISTRIBUTION FOR PART 50 DOCKET MATERIAL (TEMPORARY FORM)

CONTROL NO: 2 FILE-FROM: Duke Power Company DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER

  • ( ' ' * '
  • 2-28-75 3-7-75 XXXX TO:

~

ORIG CC OTHER SENT AEC PDR XX Mr Giambusso 3 signed SENT LOCAL PDR XX CLASS UNCLASS PROPINFO INPUT NO CYS REC'D DOCKET NO:

XXXXX XX 3

O -2693 70/287 DESCRIPTION:

ENCLOSURES:

Ltr notarized 3-7-75....trans the following:

Andt to OL/ Change to Tech Specs:

Consisting of revision to Appendix A of the Tech Specs

....with regard to tech review & control &

independent review and audit..............

1 PLANT NAME: oconee 1-3 J

FOR ACTION /INFORMATION 3-10-75 chf BUTLER (L)

SCHWENCER (L) ZlEMANN (L)

REG AN (E)

' W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies CLARK (L)

STOLZ (L)

DICKER (E)

LE AR (L)

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies PAR R (L)

VASSALLO (L)

KNIGHTON (E)

SPE LS W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies KNIE L (L)

PURPLE (L)

YOUNGBLOOD (E)

W/ Copies

' W4 Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION Ff H E G F_H E TECH REVIEW DENTON LIC ASST A/T IN D rNHC PDR SCH ROEDE R GRIMES R. DIGGS (L)

BRAITMAN

/OGC. ROOM P 506A MACCARY GAMMILL H. GEARIN (L)

SALTZMAN GOSSICK/ STAFF KNIGHT K ASTN E R E. GOULBOURNE (L)

MELTZ f

CASE PAWLICKl BALLARD P. KREUTZER (E)

GI AM BUSSO SHAO SPANGLER J. LEE (L)

PLANS BOYD STELLO M. MAIGRET (L)

MCDONALD MOORE (L)

HOUSTON ENVIRO S. REED (E)

CHAPMAN DEYOUNG (L)

NOVAK MULLER M. SERVICE (L)

DUBE (Ltr) y SKOVHOLT (L)

ROSS DICKER S. SHEPPARD (L)

j. E. COUPE fGOLLER (L) (Ltr)

IPPOLITO KNIGHTON

,M. SLATER (E)

PETERSON P. CO LLINS TEDESCO YOUNGBLOOD H. SMirH (L)

HARTFIELD (2)

DENISE LONG REGAN S. TEETS (L)

KLECKER R E_G O P R LAIN AS PROJECT LDR G. WILL ' AMS (E)

EISENHUT

/ FILE & REGION (2)

BENAROYA Ac. ale.t_t1 V. WILSUN (L)

WIG ON T.R. WILSON VOLLMER HAR LESS R. INGRAM (L)

,,,,, C.

O " 30"1 STEELE EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION k

l - LOCAL PDRJl/ai/daMaf2)(10) - N ATION AL LABS S. C-ff - TIC (ABERN ATHY) (1) 1 - PDR SAN /LA/NY l

f - NSIC (BUCHANAN) 1 - W. PENNINGTON, Rm E-201 GT 1 - BROOKHAVEN NAT LAB l

1 - ASLS 1 - CONSULTAN' 1 1 - G. ULRIKSON, ORNL 1 - Newton Anderson NEWMARK/B JME/AGBABI AN 1 - AGMED (RUTH GUSSMAN) jlb ACRS ^

"'SENT Rm B-127 GT "T~ o 4. 4

.3N #*//A#c 1 - J. D. R UN K LE'S, Rm E-201 911ky e

m 2,

DUKE POWER COMPANY Powna Buzz.orwo 4aa SouTu Causcu Srazer, CnAnz.oTTz, N. C. anson A. C. THIES ss=.o. v cc pas,.cs.,

P O. Box ai7e

..cw

. t..

o February 28, 1975 rh'la %

eN

s

\\

,~

_,s

\\

i j

Mr. Angelo Giambusso, Director y\\

,,, ~

Division of Reactor Licensing P

~~1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation h

N Y U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission p

U73 - ' j/

[

Washington, D. C.

20555

\\Q

.,/

\\ /,,. ~

'.j

...a e'

Re:

Oconee Nuclear Station Y,M'd f Docket Nos. 50-269, -270, -287

Dear Mr. Giambusso:

Pursuant to 10CFR50.90, please find attached a proposed amendment to the Oconee Nuclear Station Technical Specifications, Appendix A to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-38, -47, and -55.

This proposed amendment is submitted in response to Mr. Robert A. Purple's letter of December 18, 1974.

As per Mr. Purple's letter the revisions included in the attached are concerned with two major topics:

Technical review and control and independent review and audit.

With regard to technical review and control (see proposed Technical Specification 6.1.2), the current Oconee Technical Specifications and the standard technical specifications forwarded by Mr. Purple's letter establish an on-site review committee. The attached does not establish an on-site review committee, rather, controls have been identified which, when implemented, will be more effective than use of such a committee. These proposed changes in the area of technical review and control are based on significant experience at Oconee, from which it has been determined that for control of technical matters, such as procedures and changes thereto, proposed tests and experiments, proposed Technical Specification changes and proposed modifications, that better results can be obtained by use of a comprehensive second-party verification, rather than by a committee review.

For other matters normally within the purview of an on-site review consnittee, such as incident investigation, performance of special reviews, review of the station security program and review of the station emergency plan, it has been determined that these can best be accomplished by use of the normal organizational structure or, as necessary, by ad hoc groups.

1 MS3

n

/

O Mr. Angelo Giambusso Page 2 February 28, 1975 It should also be noted that the standard technical.pecifications assign to the on-site review committee the responsibility for " review of facility operations to detect potential safety hazcrds." This item is not included in the attached as it is felt that the on-site operating organization, as part of the normal duties of station supervisory personnel, should provide timely and continuing monitoring of operating activities, including detection of specific potential safety hazards, to verify that such activities are conducted safely.

These monitoring activities are properly considered to be an integral part of the routine supervisory function.

The overview of station activities to detect significant, generic potential safety hazards cannot be per-i formed by personnel intimately involved in day-to-day operating activities, i.e.,

station ptrsonnel, but rather =ust be and is performed by the independent review group.

With regard to independent review and audit, the attached adopts the standard technical specifications.

The Nuclear Safety Review Unit described, however, while being in agreement with the standard technical specifications, does represent a change from the presently established Nuclear Safety Review Committee as it is felt that the effective per-formance of the responsibilities placed upon the independent review and audit group by the attached dictates use of an organizational unit rather than a standing committee. Upon approval and issuance of the attached by the Commission, it is Duke's intent to establish the Nuclear Safety Review Unit as specified and to staff the Unit with several full-time personnel.

Other personnel within the Company will be designated, as required, to participate in the Unit on a part-time basis.

Also consultants will be utilized, as deemed necessary.

Very truly yours,

~~

p/ g V!,4.

/A, a6 A. C. Thies ACT:vr a

_m Mr. Angelo Giambusso Page 3 February 28, 1975 A. C. THIES, being duly sworn, states that he is Senior Vice President of Duke Power Company; that he is authorized on the part of said Company to sign and file with the Atomic Energy Commission this request for amendment of the Oconee Nuclear Station Technical Specifications, Appendix A to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55; and that all statements and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge.

l

,}g f /. C

, v.

-.. cf..

A. C. Thies, Senior Vice President ATTEST:

ohn C. Goodman, Jr.

~/,

Assistant Secretary i

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 28th day of February, 1975.

i 1

^

7, g

/ ?.b c,-

r!

~ i. us,. c w/

Notary Public My Cocunission Expires:

l O k/D.

Ad/?YY

/

t

.