ML19310A646

Summary of 800423-24 Meeting W/Util & Nc Municipal Power Agency Number 1 & Site Visit to Assess Const Schedule.List of Attendees,Agenda,Presentation Summary,Handouts & Test Program Summary Encl

ML19310A646
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	06/06/1980
From:	Hood D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8006200594
Download: ML19310A646 (26)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. puto ,,s UNITED STATES { g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION .:. 2 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 [ JUN 6 1980 % i v Docket Nos.: 50-413 and 50-414 APPLICANT: DUKE POWER COMPANY FACILITY: CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 & 2

SUMMARY

OF APRIL 23-24, 1980 MEETING AND SITE VISIT TO ASSESS CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE ~ On April 23-24, 1980 the NRC staff met with Duke Power Company (DPC) and the North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 1, at thc Catawba site to discuss the scheduling of construction and to observe the construction activities completed or in progress. Meeting attendees are listed in. NRC representatives included a member of the Caseload Fore-cast Panel (hereafter called the Panel). is the meeting agenda. The purpose cf this meeting and tour was to provide for the staff's independ-ent assessment of construction completion. DPC estimates that in March 1980, Unit 1 and common facilities was 69.8% complete and Unit 2 was 12% complete. DPC's present estimate for construction completion and fuel loading for Unit 1 is April 1983 with commercial operation by July 1983. DPC's corresponding estimates for Unit 2 are October 1984 and January 1985. On the basis of an earlier Unit 1 fuel load date of February 1981, DPC tendered on March 21, 1979, an application for operating licenses for Catawba; however staff accept-ance review of the tendered application was impacted by increased workloads following the TMI-2 accident, coupled with the subsequent revision of the Catawba completion estimates by DPC. Therefore, an ancillary purpose of the Panels completion estimate is to provide a basis for establishing a target date for docketing of the OL application. Conclusions a. Unit 1 On the basis of the present status, the staff concludes that DPC's schedule for hanger design, fabrication and installation is overly optimistic to support the Unit 1 hot functional testing schedule of August 1982 and associated fuel load date of April,1983. The staff concludes that a more realistic fuel load date is the fourth quarter of 1983, nominally October. The key to recovery of DPCs schedule lies in effecting sufficient and timely hanger releases from the Design Department to the field. The staff observed that Design and THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS P0OR QUAUTY PAGES 80062oga

JUN 6 1980 Duke Power Company Construction are both presently working to hanger schedules extending 133 working days beyond DPCs current target completion dates, but that additional resources are being added to the Steam Production Department in an effort to recover. The Staff also noted that DPC's management is fully committed to this recovery effort. Although not presently impacting the completion schedule, the Staff noted that DPC's estimate for the bulk quantity of cable needed to completion was about 25 to 35% less than that of similar plants. DPC's explanation for this lower quantity is that increased use is made of multi-conductor cable, particularly between the termination block and the control room. The Staff expressed doubt that this would account for the degree of variation involved and suggested DPC re-examine its present estimate in the interest of avoiding future schedular diffi-culties. The Staff also cautioned that the schedule for pulling and terminating cable appeared to be tight, relative to the performance of other plants, and that this area would be further impacted if in-creases in cable quantities are found to be needed later in construction. The Staff agrees with DPC that Unit 1 and common facilities are presently about 70% complete. b. Unit 2 The staff disagrees with OPC's estimate that Unit 2 is presently about 12% complete. On the basis of concrete, piping and major compor.ents in place, as observed during the site tour, the staff estimates that physical construction of Unit 2 is from 36 to 40% completed. The discussions revealed a significant difference in DPC and industry methodologies used for calculating percent complete which probably accounts for this difference. DPC intends to examine its methodology further in view of techniques used by the rest of industry. The Staff assumes that the construction delay in its estimate for Unit 1 will impact Unit 2 by the same extent, resulting in a fuel load estimate of April 1985 for Unit 2. c. Target Date for OL Application On the basis of the Panel's estimate of October 83 for Unit 1 completion, a docket date of about April 1981 for the Catawba OL application would provide for the 30 month licensing period typically allotted for contested cases (including time for ACRS review and hearings). DPC management reiterated its determination to recover from the present hanger diffi-culties and achieve the April 83 construction completion data for which the corresponding docket date would need to be October 80. DPC intends to demonstrate during the Autumn of 1980 that appropriate measures have

Duke Power Company JUN 6 1980 been and are being implemented to achieve this goal, and requested a meeting with the Panel to this end during early Autumn. The Staff agreed that an update at that time would be appropriate. The Staff also acknowledged that the 30 month ground rule itself is likely to increase a few months in view of changes since the TMI-2 accident. Presentations Summaries of the presentations during the meeting are given in Enclosure 3. Handouts during the presentation are shown in Enclosure 4. y n //..

• Darl S. Hood, Project Manager Licensing Branch 3 Division of Licensing

Enclosures:

1. List of Attendees 2. Agenda 3. Presentation Summary 4. Handouts cc: See next page i l l 8 F 1 l

Mr. William 0. Parker Vice President - Steam Production Duke Power Ccmpany P. O. Box 33189 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 cc: William L. Porter, Esq. Duke Power Company P. O. Box 33189 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq. Debevoise & Liberman 1200 Seventeenth Street, N. W. Washington, D. C. 20036 North Carolina MPA-1 Suite 208 222 North Person Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Mr. R. S. Howard Power Systems Division Westinghouse Electric Corporation P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Mr. C. W. Woods tiUS Corporation 2536 Countryside Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 Mr. Jesse L. Riley, President Carolina Envirofnmental Study Group 854 Henley Place Charlotte, North Carolina 28208 Richard P. Wilson, Esq. Assistant Attorney General S. C. Attorney General's Office P. O. Box 11549 Columiba, South Carolina 29211 Walton J. McLeod, Jr., Esq. General Counsel South Carolina State Board of Health J. Marion Sims Building 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 J

Mr. William 0. Parker. cc: James W. Burch, Of rector Nuclear Advisory Counsel 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 e I

ENCLOSURE 1 MEETING ATTENDEES Duke Power Company R. 0. Sharpe G. W. Grier L. E. Suther C. F. York J. W. Cox W. S. Horton W. R. Campbell R. L. Weber R. L. Spangler T. V. Moore C. E. Muse J. W. Hampton J. M. Lambert R. E. Miller M. D. Hopktns L. C. Johnson R. C. Powell W. G. Rixon C. L. Ray D. L. Freeze J. E. Beall J. W. Dressler J. F. Stallings D. G. Beam North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 1 A. L. Hubert NRC W. Lovelace, MPA/ Caseload Forecast Panel D. Hood, Manager, Licensing Branch 3 t

1 ENCLOSURE 2 AGENDA NRC CASE LOAD FORECAST PANEL VISIT Wednesday, April 23 Introduction, Schedule for Licensing - B. O. Sharpe Purpose of Visit - NRC Overview of Project - D. G. Beam Engineering Status Mechanical - M. D. Hopkins Pipe Hangers - C. L. Ray Electrical - L. E. Suther Schedular Impact of TMI - R. E. Miller Procurement Status of Major Components - J. F. Stallings Construction Status Bulk Quantities - D. L. Freeze Pipe Hangers - C. F. York Craft Work Force - D. L. Freeze Estimated Percent Completion - D. L. Freeze Preoperational Testing - J. W. Hampton Raview of Schedule - J. M. Lambert Need for Power / Financial - R. O. Sharpe Thursday, April 24 4 Site Tour General Discussion Summary'and Conclusions

ENCLOSURE 3

SUMMARY

OF PRESENTATIONS 1. Licensing Schedule and Milestones (R. Sharpe/D. Hood) A chronology of significant events associated with or impacting Catawba licensing activities are as follows: Unit 1 Unit 2 Site Preparation (LWA) May 16, 1974 May 16,1974 CP's Issued August 7, 1975 August 7, 1975 FSAR Tendered March 21, 1979 March 21, 1979 TMI-2 Accident (Catawba Review Interruption) March 28, 1979 March 28, 1979 DPC Announces Revised Catawba Schedules July 27,1979 July 27, 1979 CP Expiration Date June 1, 1981 June 1, 1982 Hot Functional Tests (DPC est.) August,1982 February, 1984 Load Fuel (DPC est.) April,1983 October,1984 Commercial Operation (DPC est.) July,1983 January 1985 When the OL application was tendered on March 21, 1975, DPCs estimate for fuel load was February 1981 (Unit 1) and August 1982 (Unit 2). These dates were the subject of a previous Panel visit on January 24-25, 19/?. Staff review of the tendered OL application was deferred following the ihree Mile Island, Unit 2 accident and was further impacted by DPCs schedular revision of the Catawba units in the summer of 1979. For these reasons, DPC requested on August 31, 1979 that the staff forward the results of its review for use in DPCs continuing update of the application, including changes to reflect lessons learned since TMI-2 and other recent changes, in order that DPC may resubmit the application in mid-1980. The staff's limited review during this period has proceeded with the assistance of national laboratories and other agencies. Mr. Sharpe sunimarized the status of the present and potential ownership for the Catawba units. At present, the applicants are DPC and NCMPA-1 which owns 75% undivided interest in Unit 2 and a 37.5% interest in the station support facilities as tenants in common. DPC retains exclusive respon-sibility for the design, construction and operation of the Catawba Nuclear Station. Discussions are unddrway with a South Carolina Municipality re-garding the remaining 25% of Unit 2. Proposals are also under consideration with Cooperatives of the NC and SC service area regarding all or any part of Unit 1. The staff reviewed the status of'the TMI Action Plan, NUREG-0660 soon to be reviewed by the Commissioners and thereafter forwarded to applicants as a basis for licensing resumption. The staff also discussed the reorganization m v 4 ,y-y

2-of NRR currently in progress, staff priorities for FY 80 & 81, staff backlog since TMI-2, NRC hiring freeze, staff shortages in cr:tical skills areas, questions as to continued funding for consultants supporting staff review, and Congressional consideration of a 5% NRC budget cut for FY 81. The staff emphasized its increased need for review efficiencies and the significance of complete and timely documentation reflecting actual final design and construction for that review. 2. Project Overview and Craft Work Force (D. Beam /D. L. Freeze) Mr. Beam reviewed the DPC rescheduling decision for Catawba implemented since the previous Panel visit and noted his confidence that construction consistent with the revised dates for connercial operation is achievable. The present construction force of 3300, distributed by trades in accordance with Figure 1 of Enclosure 4, represents the full complement needed to date and the next few years. Recent delays for DPC's Cherokee plants have in-creased the availability of experienced personnel for the Catawba project and no shortages exist at present. DPC also maintains four schools on site to train crafts consistent with projected needs. DPC utilizes non-union labor. Construction is proceeding on the basis of a single 40 hour shift per week. Selected major construction events completed since the Panels January, 4 1979 visit are shown in Figure 2a of Enclosure 4. Figure 2b illustrates construction logic for a typical mechanical system. 3. Engineering Status DPC is presently working to a " late start" schedule for Unit 1, i.e., the fuel load date for the present schedule occurs 133 working days after the target fuel load date of April 1983. DPC feels it is reducing this gap and noted that in November 1979 this gap was 162 days. The gap was said to result from manpower resource limitations within Duke's Steam Production Department. This is causing similar delays in construction. The status of design engineering within DPC's Mechanical / Nuclear Division was summarized as shown in Figure 3 of Enclosure 4. Mr. C. Ray described the Dec. 79 reorganization of construction and design personnel for hangers and supports, and the creation of DPC's "As-Designed Support Program". Figure 4 of Enclosure 4 shows the completion status of the supports and restraints of four different categories: (1) " Rigorous" or high temperatures and pressure piping subjected to full stress analyses, (2) " Alternate Analyses" (A/A) or medium range temperature and pressure piping about 4 inches and under, (3) "EDS" or piping within the scope of EDS Nuclear, Inc. and generally of the " rigorous" category but inside containment, and (4) " Load & Location" or small base (> 21/2") piping of ambient temperatures and pressures. The figure shows that engineering, rather than construction, is pacing at present.

. The staff noted that the DPC estimate for the total quantity of supports needed at completion is comparable to the experience of earlier similar plants. The electrical engineering status was summarized based upon Figure Sa and 5b of Enclosure 4. However, these figures are based upon DPC's previous completion schedules. Cable releases as of 4/15/80 are shown to be behind schedule. DPC estimated that if adjusted for the new schedule, Unit 1 would show little change, whereas Unit 2 would probably not be behind schedule. Schedular difficulties are primarily associated with the Fire Protection System and the Auxiliary Building Ventilation System. The staff requested that DPC's estimate of cable be provided in units of linear feet, and consequently was provided a handout entitled " Cable Status Report - Unit 1" (not included in this report due to volume). The handout shows a bulk estimate of about 4 million feet. Civil engineering is essentially complete. 4. TMI-2 Impact (R. Miller) Mr. Miller described DPC's internal activities in response to the Three Mile Island Unit 2 accident, beginning with the formation of the Nuclear Station Review Team shortly thereafter. The team has conducted independent assessments and issued reports to DPC management on each plant recomending appropriate modifications. The final report for the Catawba units was issued in February 1980. The report was said to contain all the require-ments of NUREG-0578, plus several other changes made for reasons of safety and performance. Comparison with NUREG-0660 has not been completed. Recomendations for Catawba have had the benefit of studies for prior Duke plants, including the Auxiliary Feedwater System design on McGuire. The tendered Catawba FSAR is being modified to reflect these changes. ) Mr. Miller foresees no significant impact upon the Catawba schedule due to TMI. The staff has no information from DPC for Catawba upon which to agree or disagree with Mr. Miller's conclusion. 5. Procurement DPC appears to have no major procurement difficulties and none are foreseen. Some minor difficulties are being experienced in getting instrumentation out of the vendor shops. Except for instrumentation which is uniquely identified and ordered on a systems basis, procurement is made on a bulk baris. DPC is recovering from a strike by its instrumentation vendor, Barton, -which ended April 16, 1980 and plans to have about 75% of the instrumentation needed on site in about three months. 6. Bulk Quantities Bulk quantities scheduled and completed are shown in Figures 6a (Unit 1 and common facilities) and 6b (Unit 2).

. 7. E,s_timated Percentage Complete As of March 1980, OPC estimates that Unit 1 is 69.8% complete and Unit 2 is 12% complete. A11~ common facilities are included with the Unit 1 es timate. The total station is estimated to be 49%. In November 1979 DPC changed its estimation technique from a manhours basis to an " earned value" concept. The revised method tracks only selected items (concrete, pipe, hangers, instruments and cable pulling and terminatations) associated with critical paths. This is illustrated by Figures 7a, 7b and /c of Enclosure 4. The technique was changed in November 1979. The effect of this c.hange in technique is reflected in the percentages provided by DPC: for the Yellow Book before and after November 1979. The October 1979 Yellow Book (indicating status as of August 31,1979) shows Unit 1 and comon facilities at '. 5% and Unit 2 at 35%. The February 1980 Yellow Book 4 6' (indicating status as'of December 31, 1979) shows Unit 1 and common at 64% and Unit 2 at 12%. Consequently between August 31, 1979 and December 31,

• 1979, Unit 1 and common advanced 19%, while Unit 2 regressed 23%.

The staff noted that the revised technique diff.ered significantly from the methods used by the rest of the industrygstTgoested that DPC evaluate ^ its method relative to industry techniques. The staff also discussed its use of the results relative to its review priority decisions and resource justification and emphasized the need for consistent techniques within the industry to this end. The staff stated that the omission of other work activities and the inclu-sion of appropriate weighing factors for degree of difficulty for specific tasks appeared to be a significant shortcoming of the DPC calculational technique. The staff also noted that the zero base should be re-examined - to recognize work already completed at the time of first concrete pour (e.g., excrevation and rebar placement). l 8. Preoperational Testing (J. Hampton) The status of test procedure development and test program manpower as of April.1,1980 is summarized in Figure 8 of Enclosure 4. A preap test senedule of about 26 months. is planned, beginning about August 1980. The staff cautioned that while this duration is consistent with present experience, changes since the TMI-2 accident have not yet been incorporated into this estimate and that some increase in test duration should be considered. 9. Need for Power (R. Sharpe) Forecasts of load, capacity and reserves are shown in Figure 9 of inclosure 4. Financial difficulties reflect that of all industry in today's capital markets. The finance situation.is early 1980 caused Duke to cut $850 million from its 1980-1982 budget, leaving $2.6 billion for construction and nuclear fuel purchases. This reduction resulted in rescheduling of the Cherokee units. In mid-March 1980 Duke sold $150 million in first mortage bonds; two-thirds of these were 30 year notes yielding 14.95% and the rest were seven year notes yielding 14.375%. DPC's comon stock j sold at 70% of book value.

ENCLOSURE 4 Presentation Handouts I t l

.. L ,,,,,, r, r.,, ~I.:, n. e l.., r I r. >M ANPOWER REPOR ' 'i-20-c0 ..a ., r., uniuc. .[Wr;tRai. APettC A160 tab IR AN'ef L 45 Pet'd(1 et =u o cou,. ca 'oYsoY.'o# ','d_ ofwe's.m.e CL A$11FIC AllON N6tf CR AF T r2O II"O - en .o.., " a u,,..a ,JE C T g,g .c ,7 . c., + fir e c A : aye r Sr 2._ _ ~12 1 Drit.L f ayer g- -.. - ~ ~~ - 42 Duilder Hlor ._.-Duildee trnr -- ff 28 Cement,, Finisher $r 2 Cement Finisher JO Cement Finisher tilpr I-~ Cement Finisher trne 1 i. eCons F.leen Sr 19 l, - Cons E Icen 7 ~T65 ~ l ! Cons Elcen tilor 93-40 s l x' Cons Elecn Lrnr I 75-19 Cons tiech Sr 3 Cons Hech 51 Cons Hech Hipr 2T ..- _ = Cons ticch trnr I 4 Crane Creratr A 21 h Crane Operatr 8 5 4 j ~ Crane Mlpr A l3 Crane Hlpr B j'; Locomotive J eratr A 1_ Locomotive Operatr 8 I 3 Painter Sr 5 Painter I 49 Painter Hipr 2

• = -

Painter Lrne 9 6 PH tiech Sr 74 i e PH tiech I 393 g PH Mech Hlor 3_ 291 [', PH ta ch trne 7 95 60 c Spec Equio Operate 23 -arN Steelwkr Sr 10 i \\ Staelwkr Hlor.-- o Steelwkr, .,j 7,1 ) 107 = Steetwkr Lene .3 9 1 9 1 e f* Trk Drve 19

1. 9-LM Utttymn $r 5

g Utitymn 2 3 4 223 22 1 g- .C Widr Sr 33 g' Uldr 3 2 7 3ll ) La Vide Hlor 2 48 Widr Lrnr 17 30 Eng Aide 12 >) v ?.r., ...t Eng Techn A I I 2 .Ef'{h? t:;g:6 Enq Techn S 6 Hecht insptr 64 Techn 13 h I Insptr A 31 insper B 12 Insptr Lrne 1 ,,,,I n_s t rumen tma n A 9 In5 Eumentman S 9 _Rodgan_A 20 Rodman B 6 __Ast 5fty Suov i 9 _c'.. G1k 10 I 160 _ 'iatI Ckr jg,,,,_,, Matt CLr Hipr. 1 41 Security Guard 2 31

m..,..;

i $teno l _. j;y: W ,,,,, _a r ehou s eman Strkpr Ast S t u_ dent 1l 4 i 10 rat etw,E xt v NONf M Mrf 1 17 17 9 la 17 7987 'NOT st4CLUDED IN PROJECf TOT AL COLUMN 10 f At MONf HtY rJOf st Af MPI 166 gogag gagg7g 977 7 l rAv ect s 10 tat { iP l l MANPowt u t ot At i 4400 l 10tAs 1300 I '~r, ', 11+ 21 gli . I I.+ J i .til (J)** = ,. Contractors ICS

• • %"***r
• a..a. $.

4 - 4,,_,,,.,,,, ,e,,,, t.:- ~

FIGURE 2a MAJOR MILESTONES COMPLETED SINCE JANUARY 1979 Unit 1 Complete ~ Stock Power 3-01-79 Spent Fuel Pool 4-18-79 New Fuel Building 5-18-79 Unit 2 Comolete Auxiliary Service Sullding 3-12-79 Reactor Building Refueling Canal Valls 6-08-79 Turbine Building Substructure Wall 7-30-79 Reactor Building Shell Vall 8-15-79 Turbine Building Substructure Concrete 8-16-79 Spent Fuel Pool 10-08-79 New Fuel Building 10-19-79 i l Reactor Building Crane Wall 11-27-79 Reactor Pressure Vessel 4-15-80 i 4-22-80

r-ge h +4 wh mhM - dr-e he e gm..e ~ o 8! - 'N C: W*i i a e 3 3 @% ?- lt s04 g k i s,,4 a QR ( - _ -, QC O 4 i y ~ c< r .N I E, k ~ l l N' n %s, hk@ b 1 l ~ Y I i'a i 9 t3 -Ik I q s, q v. i h,.j,s i Q Y i c g%(' ~ l W .Y w { g L._______g c n 8 4 5 m s $ 2 wS-U u 4 tf g ~u. u-s t s w %p* q% .3 4 T 3 s e c e N, Y! s N-hS %gl N. Ik E 2, n!n i,qs h 4; e

a Si S>-

e$ Wi a W:Q C O ~ w oe. 4 esw.m

l Figura 3 f CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION DESIGN ENGINEERING MECHANICAL./NUCLEAJ D;V ION STATUS MARCH D,... - Mechanical Systems tiSY.S. EDS.S.

1. FLOW DIAGRAM SHEETS UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 1 F_2 TO BE ISSUED R

lJl 53 ISSUED 4 .L/1 48 1 REQUIRING SIGNIFICN1T CHANGES 8 0 t

2. SPECIFICATIONS, EVALUATIONS, P; SCOPE EEQP LQLC.

MRS.S. 1 SPECIFICATICNS REGUIRED [. 1 SPECIFICATIONS ISSUED 1 EVALUATIONS COMPLETED . 54 109 " VALVE ESTIMATES (NOTE 1) UNIT 1 8 2 EEOP_ UD.LC. MRS.S. A. PROCESS LINE VALVES 19, B. MECHANICAL INSTRIEENTATION VALVES a, 22, 0 C. MISCELIANE0US VALVES .1 .O. 46,520 22,800 W 3. A. PIPING DESIGN (STATION) dDB. MRS.S. SUBSYSTEMS REQUIRED M l.05 SUBSYSTEMS RELEASED .L6/ .05 B. HVAC DESIGN (STATION)_ l.AYOUT DRAWINGS REQUIRED LAYOUT DRAWINGS RELEASE 9

4. *INSTRtFENT LOOP ESTIMATES (MDIC) (NOTE 1)

UNIT 1 UNIT 2 ESTIMATED NOTER OF LOOPS (NOTE A) 7,100 5,lR APPROXIMATE NWEER OF LOOPS RELEASED 6,//0 3,000 NOTE A: ESTIMATES DO NOT INCLUDE POTENTIAL ADDITIONS RESULTING FROM TMI-2 ACCIDENT.

5. SIRESS ANALYSIS (MSAG)

UNIT 1 UNIT 2 WORK PACKAGES IDENTIFIED 1

.90 WORK PACKAGES RELEASED

. 04

6.

• SUPPORT / RESTRAINT ESTIMATES (MSRG) (NOTE 1 & 2) giternate Analyses LOAD 8 LOCATION RIGOROUS e/!.

EDS. tFI. IRIAL C A. UNIT 1(ESTIMATE) 19,130 7,600 11,600 2,500 2010 42,840 B. UNIT 2 (ESTIMATE) 15,760 6,800 8,060 2,500 1870 34,900 1

• f0TE1: ESTIMATES ARE ROUNDED OFF TO NEAREST TEN.

l NOTE 2: SUPPCRT/ RESTRAINTS ON FIEQ ROUTED PIPE ARE NOT INCLUDED IN TilESE i TOTALS, WIS TYPE PIPE IS 4" OR SMALLER, DUKE CLASS G AND H, LOF. 4 Fl.lilD DFSir.H TI'Mi1 RATIJRF, NIO ARI TYl'ICALLY VCflTS AND DRAlf1S.

- FIGURE 4 E CATAt(BA NUCLEAR' STATION f SUPPORT / RESTRAINT STATUS

SUMMARY

f., /

AS OF April 11, 1980 h/ fUNIT1 ORIGINAL AS-DESIGNED ESTIMATE COMPLETE SCHEDULED TOTAL SCHEDULED TO S/R RELEASED COMPLETE COMPLETE BE RELEASED OF SCHEDULE 0 RIGOROUS (IN M 7, 7655 6195 412 144 E 171 68 ALTERNATE [z9u, i1561 10345 99 [ 37s 2 / 7* 218 129 "W) 4 EDS SCOPE (nF""8, 2466 1810 333 206 627, o o insile Co~.) LOAD & LOCATION 19204 17237 2691 6787 ~2084 2010 I (5-4 H beec, > 2 \\ a ~ osest T$ P) TOTAL 40886 35587 4432 7344 2473 2207 's HVAC 2011 883 0 79 0 0 i UNIT 11 RIGOROUS ,6801 1368 ' ALTERNATE 8153 502 > EDS SCOPE 2463 0 LOAD & LOCATION 14725 612), i 1 TOTAL 32142 8069 J i i HVAC 1873 600

J Figure 5a CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION ELECTRICAL DIVISION STATUS f%RCH 15,1980 Wilt 1 Wilt 2 ~ 1. ENGINEERING PACKAGES RELEASED TO DESIGN ~ ~ ~ ' ' ' 216 165 TOTAL 212 162 ISSUED BEHIND SCHEDULE - 1 2'

2. SYSTEMS RELEASED TO CONSTRUCTION 213

~ 165 TOTAL 204 44 . ISSUED i BEHIND SCHEDULE - 4 83 #

3. CABLES (AS OF 4/15/80) 17,511 11A65 ESTIMATED 15,591 8,020 MIGINATED 14,292 1,700 ISSUED

1. Lt/c lusuppo#!

19 93 C O. CO of w $ sls e$e le $ b r ho 19 t5

~ .-..,p.. p.s s,,,.. e. .~..,,t a g. l s r t

• • g*

= 8. t-

• * * *7 * ?

6 .*4** - '* 4 m.. l g l 3 l i a i 1 t I l 1 l e l l 4 t e 8 ? n g l r i. fig.. 5b... qre i q. i... ru .. ;.: 1...; ; i .,..3 l i l i ...a .,,3 ;w. 6,3.,, ,u.,, ,.eu3_, .i. l..... 17090 _ p: i. g .7 fa: ,.,...i i,. e i s se 16 m - ..a s g.3 isow#3Jf.4. ,,ws .e l l_ i l 6 -{ -+ i -.. i. - --

a. * - g - -. ~... +.

u ry. ri;u..g3 1$000 .'6 a 8-l l !..

1. 21J.,M44 l

8 6 g 43 6 W, *** s lt.000 e... l HHZ , t. ' '

1.. e g

o / ,ssu l un AoJo

• sme nooO e

.... _ -. I... nejecie Coue noiseses_-_.,p ua:. ~ i ~ l' i, ! neoy}'//mi 12

• 0 s

i 8 ena - i ii m - l. l ,s. , suse m i

• l04 -

8

• ,,,g j

~ t a. t

• f9se '

7064 e /6888-I / ,m r s!ggg y l e t 0454 tfbe yyy spy m a L j,#. #3931 /yses - Actuel. Cable Releases 'l FOM - 6,sa NOTES g / $UQ 6m Sfd5 / l ,/,1. *I75tl No.of Cat.les EstteeteJ by system / Folloutng Cables Not incluJeJ 1e (1) .M, #3 ?.**Continulag et approalmately 70 cables per mostl. to 3/3/82 $303 m e usip ,,,, l 2. 200 Fre Fab Computer Cables (tiet Camputer touted) g 4251 f em 1i000 8 Jfd5,p 30M l ./Ja#4 pm _ 215fs,k128 f. 2453 h i I M Mo f

• g.

ggg3, / 204 7 Cable Inst'alled' i '" > s iGTS SV"'* 'M 4541 1000 c. + 4.h W nys. "uM". - I JUL' AUG'5EP 'OCT I I DEC' JAN' FE6' mAI i l t Iggg I gg p8 GCT' hov'0EC 3 JAs.6 g g,Brg g I 8 APA' mv' Jurs ' Jul' AUG' 5EP' O.CT'lIOV ' DEC ' JA81' FES'*A 'APA ' mT ' JUN h0V gpg gy agg jgg 'm4 8 1979 1983 1351 Is70 e .e i e 1 .l stegend: CATALSA NUCLEAR STATlose l. .3 g g,, .~ i Projected Cable heleases l UNIT l

• 4

.. J s g j l. l'. i... EETimTED CABLE ACLEASC CUAVC. Actual Cable Aeleases f -... Cables installed l' l {,. t g ? t I g i. i ~, s s s .. i... ' Based upon Feb.1981; Fuel 1 opd Schedule.. 'I* s.

Figure 6a CATAWBA - UNIT 1 and Comon Actual quantity Average Total Total Quanti ty Complete Installation Rate item Estimate Scheduled As of 4-11-80 % Comotete Actual Concrete 455,000 N/A 453,584 99.7 N/A (Cu Yds) Exposed Pipe 332,420 267,372 276,857 83.3 2,641/ week (klaighted Value) Hengers 40,706 (3/7/80) 9,628 11,012 27.0 272/ week -Alter / Rig 21,626 2,411 2,245 10.4 86/ week -construction 19,080 7,217 8,767 45.9 186/ week i ' Ccble Pulling 17,648 8,156 9,009 51.0 133/ week -M:chanical (No.0f 8,226 2,956 3,387 41.2 69/ week -Elect rical Cables)9,422 5,200 5,622 59.7 64/ week Ceble Term (ea) 35,296 10,876 11,392 32.0 126/ week -M;chanical 16,452 2,871 3,038 18.5 36/ week -Electrical 18,844 8,005 8,354 44.3 90/ week Inst.uments 6,926 1,819 1,826 26.0 58/ week (Equivalent Loops) i f 4/22/80

o. Figure 6b CATAWBA - UNIT 2 Total quantity Complete item Estimate As of 3-31-80 % Complete Concrete 114,000 101,046 88.6 (Cu Yds) Exposed Pipe 243,835 6,388 2.6 (Weighted Value) Hangers 33,124 0(Start'about 0 mid 1981) Cables -PulIing 11,465 1 .008 -Terminations 22,930 2 .008 Instruments 4,520 0 0 (Equivalent Loops) 4/22/80 i

l J DUKE POWER COMPANY CONSTRUCTION DEPARTh '- UNIT STATUS REPORT e Figure 7a PROJECT Catawba UNIT _ Uni t I r, common AS OF DATE 3-31-80 ACTUAL QUANTITY TOTAL EST. ESTIMATED EARNED COMMODITY TO DATE QTY % COMP. DIRECT MH, VAL. TO DATE cnnerrte 452,611 cu yd 455.000 99.5 3,338,690 3,321,997 Pi pe 273.970 W.V. 332,420 82.4 3,008,840 2,479,284 Hangers 10.527 ea. 40.706 25.9 2.186.510 566.106 Instruments 1,827 E.L. 6,926 26.4 559,915 147,818 Cables - Pull 9,009 ea. 17,648 51.0 459,049 234,115 Cables - Term 11,392 ea. 35,296 32.3 206,401 66,668 TOTALS 9.759.405 6.816.188 UNIT % COMPLETE : 69.8 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION MH ESTIMATED 25,400,895 EXPENDED CONSTRUCTION MH TO DATE % CONSTRUCTION MH TO DATE NOTES: L

UUKL PUWtM LU."PANY j CONSTRUCTIOil DEPARTMENT UNIT STATUS REPORT Figure 7b l PROJECT catawba UNIT 2 AS OF DATE 3-31-80 l ACTUAL QUANTITY TOTAL EST. ESTIMATED EARNED COMMODITY TO DATE QTY % COMP. DIRECT MH. VAL. TO DATE i Concrete 101.046 cu yd 114,000 88.6 688,607 610,106 Pipe 6,388 W. V. 243,835 2.6 2,242,325 58,300 l H ange r's 0 33,124 0 1,815,480 0 l Instruments 0 4,520 0 364,116 0 Cables - Pull I ca. 11,465 0 326,191 0 Calbles - Term. 2 ea. 22,930 0 125,845 0 .. _...._7.._~_.._ TOTALS 5,562,56'4 668,406 UNIT % COMPLETE ! 12.0 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION MH ESTIMATED 20,502,954 EXPENDED CONSTRUCTION MH TO DATE % CONSTRUCTION MH TO DATE NOTES: G w.-.~,.-.--,.

. _ ~ DUKE POSER COMPANY CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT UNIT STATUS REPORT Figure 7c PROJECT Catawba UNIT Total AS OF DATE 3-31-80 ACTUAL QUANTITY TOTAL EST. ESTIMATED EARNED COMMODITY TO DATE QTY % COMP. DIRECT MH. VAL. TO DATE Concrete 553,657 cu yd 569,000 97.3 4,027,297 3,918,560 Pipe 280,358 w.v. 576,255 48.7 5,251,165 2,557,317 Hangers 10,527 ea. 73.830 14.3 4,001.990 572,285 Instruments 1,827 E.L. 11,446 16.0 ' 924,031 147,845 Cables-Pull 9,010 ea. 29,113 31.0 785,240 243,424 Cables - Term. 11,394 ea. 58,226 19.6 332,246 65,120 TOTALS 15,321,969 7,504.c;1 UNIT % COMPLETE

• 49.0 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION MH ESTIMATED 45,903,851 EXPENDED CONSTRUCTION MH TO DATE

% CONSTRUCTION MH TO DATE NOTES: e 9 ~ l

F.igure 8 4/1/80 CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION STEAM PRODUCTION PREOPERATIONAL TEST PROGRAM STATUS ESTPROCEDUREDEVELOPMENT Total No. of Test Completed Approved Procedures Identified Draft 207* 76 2

• Total includes 36 startup tests to be performed after initial fuel loading.

Total No. of Tests Completed Approved Required Prior to HFT Draft 120 65 2 TEST PROGRAM MANPOWER Total No. of Engineers Currently Total No. Authorized Available to Conduct Preoperational . Tests 26 36 Alternate test coordinators have been assigned for most major tests. McGuire e.vperience is being considered in determining manpower requirements. t

@'E e.-==rt*.* %'l.O N. M .e-e ei pg og art de F't 3, g P rs, d e6 4

• • ne em os no 09 69 en e9 es 4

se d

• e w em A

em 4Oe h e, em 4 =D 4 me. no ee eih S eD d e't WO OFl9 O WS St =O =9 e d Q 4 mur W9 W9e a em @ d SS 4 96 en oe no l en e a on 4 er9 e9 Q 9 to 4 4 446e< e d sese se 4 M se aI e M es eder9 d W9 Gn d Wt79 e9 ee e e 4 eum em e ce 79 t' #9 mus rg eS e

1. 9 em se se f ee.

e wg oo .p vt

1. 'I Gb

@

• 0, d

=# e@m ej M e e. es my Ps Me M er9 me d out 1we me aus e,, M, M. M e io -r eri eft e up em em D* Pe ..ee 49 W9 M eq ee se se PG 93 4 ' =# # m 4 4 em o, 9% =D 4 @ e')="' M=i Pe e9 er% " M ee en we onm m O me

• W9 @

wS ep., e me m4A 'l*e M O =0 4 4 e te M ne 99 ee ef.u e re 3 Pe =F e es em . sue A

1. 9 se 18

.=.be 3 54 c9 e9 M em om= \\ M 4 e o O ee ma 3 ,e ce J =# M 1 me Qm ee se en R.me 1 b 3 Mo U se e %ie Q Q fe e h 4 m. g r, se M w g ej Qe elae 4 O .M. e. c. - a eel 4 P'9 , due M @ee 9e e* o'% s en 4 On oe n eo O se a mis se S Q ee ce ce e J PS

1. 9 gb d e

me C se 09 e89 se en ee me N N"0 s ene pg 4 Fe em e O N P4 e'9 gtw M@ M gun p I $ 8" e* ee of e re = o **

• 9 o Nd e ce is ce w9.

2li se es w==

1. 9 edme m

c9

• • O ce em M

1. 9 em4 *e ee p

$ Sh re es 09 as s \\. =a e

4 em es se me s E ee - Jb es et fe ao

• e 1

w f e oo =e l N e. e %e A e w Q es u 'g 5dd t n,e s J w e e +=De 4 se, g w to = Se G as es e

• N

.me g e,m a w ey 4 9

• e e

'1 h& 2n e 9 m*,1 m w e 4 w te W A e d. g so .e e i 0 'J O %d W 4 ,e .D l j e* - s e e se e e 4 e 4 4 44 k \\ A l e e, .-.. N.T21K i _a ..-}}