ML19310A555
| ML19310A555 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/16/1980 |
| From: | Costello J, Hale C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19310A550 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900507 99900507-80-1, NUDOCS 8006200148 | |
| Download: ML19310A555 (7) | |
Text
,
O' U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No. 99900507/80-01 Program No. 51200 Company:
Sargent & Lundy Engineers 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Inspection at:
Chicago, Illinois Inspection Conducted: March 24-28, 1980 Inspector:
b k _ b h ).7, 4//c/rff J. R. Costello, Principal Inspector
'Date Prog valuation Section Vendor Inspection Branch Approved by:
1 L/
C.7.Qiale, Chief Date Program Evaluation Section Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Insp-sction on March 24-28, 1980 (99900507/80-01)
Areas Inspected:
Implementation of Sargent & Lundy Topical Report Sl-TR-IA, Revision 5, in the areas of design verification and design interfaces and action on previous inspection findings. The inspection involved thirty-two (32) hours on site by one (1) USNRC inspector.
Results:
In the two (2) areas inspected there were no unresolvad items.
Two (2) daviations were identified in one (1) of the areas.
Deviations: Design Verification and Design Interfaces - (1) Contrary to pro-cedur.21 requirements no interfact comments were obtained on some design drawings requiring interface comments and dates comments were received were not always entered in the log on those drawings that did receive interface comments.
(See enclosure, Notice of Deviatica, Item A). - (2) Mechanical Department Procedures covering System Design Reviews do not meet procedural requirements.
(See enclosure, Notice of Deviation, Item B).
8006200' Lg
2 DETAILS SECTION (Prepared by J. R. Costello)
A.
Persons Contacted W. C. Cleff, Mechanical Project Engineer
-P. M. DeBlake, Senior QA Instructor A. A. Supervising Engineer, Mechanical Division S. J. Fang, Supervisor Design and Aplimization, Structural and MecFanical Division T. D. Hottle, Mechanical Engineer G. C. Kao, Coordinator, Structural and Analytical Division
- J. C. Kovach, Mechanical Project Engineer W. J. Kulinski, Project Supervisor, Mechanical Design and Drafting Division J. C. LaVallee, Project Manager, Byron /Braidwood J. R. Lazowski, Project Leader, Mechanical Design and Drafting Division D. C. Patel, Supervising Design Engineer D. J. Raef, Project Leader, Electrical Physical Section A. T. Skaczlo, Senior Engineering Analyst B. Tatosian, Project Engineer, Engineering Mechanics Division B. G. Treece, Senior Electrical Project Engineer P. L. Wattelet, Project Manager, Marble Hill
' Denotes those present at exit meeting.
b.
Action on Previous Inspection Findings 1.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 79-03): Documented procedures have not been established to control S&L activities with respect to IE Bulletin 79-14.
This concerned Project Instruction PE-ZI-06 which had not been reviewed and approved for issue at the time of the 79-03 inspection.
This project instruction hus since been reviewed, approved and issued.
In order to prevent recurrence of this finding, the Project Manager has been cautioned to make sure all quality-related activities are adequately controlled by approved procedures.
In addition an audit (Internal Audit #15) was conducted December 5-10, 1979, to assure that all activities related to IE Bulletin 79-14 had been done in accordance with'the approved procedures.
There were seven (7) findings in this audit which were cle,ed out in Internal Reaudit Report No. 15.1 issued March 18, 1980.
2.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 79-04):
Contrary to pracedural require-ments, a number of persons performing safety-related work have not received QA training. As of December 5, 1979, all persons performing k
3 quality related activities have either received all required QA training or have been scheduled to attend classes for this training.
In order to prevent recurrences of this finding, personnel that fail to complete their required QA training as scheduled will be removed from quality-related activities on nuclear projects until these requirements are completed.
C.
Design Verification and Design Interfaces 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to determine that procedures have been established and are being implemented that:
Identify individuals or groups who are authorized to perform a.
design verification reviews.
b.
Require the results of the design verification effort to be clearly documented, with the identification of the verifier clearly indicated, and filed so they are identifiable to the document reviewed and can readily be retrieved.
Require that the extent of design verification take into con-c.
sideration the importance to safety, complexity, degree of standardization, state of the art, similarity with previously proven designs, applicability of standardized or previously proven designs, known problems and their effects, and changes to proviously verified designs.
d.
Identify and document the method by which design verification is to be performed.
Identify the items to be considered during design verification e.
by reviews including selection and incorporation of inputs, necessary assumptions, quality and QA requirements, codes, stand-ards, regulations, construction and operating experience, inter-faces, design method used, comparison of output with input, item application suitability, material compatibility, and maintenance features.
f.
Require that design organizations identify, in writing, their interfaces for managing the flow of design information.
g.
Define and document the responsibilities of each organizational unit for the preparation, review, approval distribution, and revision of documents involving design interfaces.
[
4 h.
Establish methods for 'ystematically communicating needed design information, inciuding changes thereto, across design interfaces.
i.
Require that design information transmitted orally or by other informal means is promptly documented, and the documentation confirmed and controlled.
j.
Identify the external organizations providing criteria, designs, specifications, and technical direction.
k.
Identify the positions and titles of key personnel in the communications channel and their responsibilities for decision making, problem resolution, providing and reviewing information.
T 2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by an examination of:
a.
Sargent & Lundy Topical Report SL-TR-IA, Revision 5 which establishes QA program commitments, b.
The following implementing procedures to satisfy topical commitments and satisfy items (a) through (k) of the objectives section.
(1) General Quality Assurance Procedures GQ 3.03, Revision 3, Classification Criteria GQ 3.04, Revision 5, Design Criteria GQ 3.07, Revision 4, Sargent & Lundy Drawings GQ 3.09, Revision 3, Foreign Design Documents GQ 3.10, Revision 4, System and Structure Design Reviews (2) Project Instructions PI-BB-4, Revision 2, Identification of Systems Requiring System Design Review PI-BB-5, Revision 5, Mechanical Department Drawing Review and Comment Requirements PI-BB-6, Revision 0, S&L Electrical Drawings - Preparation Review and Approval PI-BB-14, Revision 1, Procedure Defining the Inter and Intradepartmental Interface and Information Flow Required j
for Piping Analysis and Component Support Design t
i
5 (3) MAS-4, Revision A, Mechanical Department System Design Review For Nuclear Projects (4) ESI-250, Revision 6, Electrical Department Electrical Systems Design Review Procedure For Nuclear Projects (5) SAS-2, Revision 1, Structural Department Administrative Standard - System and Structure Design Review (6) ESO 276, Revision 11/19/76, Electrical Design Review Checklist For Nuclear Power Plant AC Offiste (Preferred Power System)
(7) ESO 277, Revision 11/29/76, Electrical Design Review Check-list for Nuclear Power Plant AC Onsite Power System c.
The following documents to verify implementation of topical commitments and procedural requirements and to satisfy implementation of (a) through (k) of the objectives section.
l (1) Mechanical Department Drawing List (Byron /Braidwood) Revised i
2/1/80.
(2) System & Structure Design Review Status Report, Revision 4 (Bryon/Braidwood).
(3) Design Criteria Status Report (Byron /Braidwood)
(4) Foreign Drawing Status Program, Complete List of Mechanical Drawings (Byron /Braidwood).
~
(5) M-154A-01, 02 Reactor Containment Incore Inst. Support Details Unit 1, Revision A.
(6) M-199-09 Reactor Building Piping Misc. Details Unit A, Revision A.
(7) M-217-02 Auxiliary Building Piping Plan Elevation 343'0" Units 1 and 2, Revision A.
(8) M-831-05 Instrument Location El 426'0" Auxiliary Building Unit 1 & 2, Revision A.
(9) M-2098-01 thru 07 HVAC/C&I Diagram Diesel Generator Room Ventilation System - VD Unit 2 Revision A.
t
6 (10) M-2154-01 thru 10 Reactor Cont. Incore Instrumentation Support Unit 2, Revision A.
(11) M-2159-01 thru 03 Reactor Building Piping Tunnel Plan El 377'0" Unit 2, Revision A.
(12) M-2546A-01 Chemical Feed and Vol Control Aux. Bldg. El 346'0" and El 364'0" Unit 1, Revision A.
(13) System and Structure Design Review Report for Main Feedwater FW (Category I portion only), 1/78, Mechanical Department.
(14) System and Structure Design Review Report for Auxiliary Power 480V AC's above, 1/78, Electrical Department.
(15) System and Structure Design Review Report for Containment Interior Column Design and Analysis, 9/12/78, Structural Department.
(16) Classification Criteria for Structures, Systems and Com-ponents CC-ME-01-BB, Revision 5.
(17) EMD Design Review Checklist for Main Steam and Feedwater, 1/31/78.
(18) System and Structure Design Review Status Report (Byron /
Braidwood) Revision 14.
(19) S-1292 Auxiliary Bldg. Mezz. Floor Framing Plan El 426'0" Area 1, Revision U.
(20) S-1302 Auxiliary Building Floor Framing Plan El 439'0" Area 2, Revision AL.
/
(21) S-1301 Auxiliary Building Floor Framing Plan El 439'0" Area 1, Revision 2.
(22) S-1609 Auxiliary Building Main Floor El 454'0" Area 3, Revision AF.
(23) 6/20 E 3361 Electrical Installation Aux. Bldg. Plan l
El 439'0", Revision J.
(24) 6/20 E 3361A Cat I Conduit Supports Aux. Bldg. Plan El 439'0", Revision G.
(25) 6/20 E 3361D01 Electrical Installation Section and l
Details Aux. Bldg., Revision E.
l l
l
7 (26) 6/20 E 3361D02 Conduct Schedule Aux. Bldg., Revision E.
(27) 6/20 E 3373 Elect. Inst. Aux. Bldg. Plan El 451'0",
Revision B.
(28) 6/20 E 3373A Category I Conduct Supports, Aux. Bldg.
Plan El 451'0", Revision B.
(29) 6/20 E 3373D01 Electrical Installation Aux. Bldg.
Plan El 451'0" Sections and Damper Schedule, Revision C.
(30) 6/20 E 3376 Electrical Installation Aux. Bldg.
Floor Plan El 459'2", Revision D.
3.
Findings a.
Deviations See enclosure Notice of Deviation, items A and B.
b.
Unresolved Items None.
D.
Exit Meeting A meeting was conducted with management representatives at the conclusion of the inspection on March 16, 1979.
In addition to the individuals indicated by an asterisk in the Details Sections, those in attendance were:
L. E. Ackman, Director of Services A. P. Gillis, Senior QA Coordinator
~
W. G. Hegener, Manager Mechanical Department G. C. Kuhlman, Project Director D. C. McClintock, Manager Electrical Department J. E. McFarland, Head Qualit Assurance Division J. M. McLaughlin, Department Manager Structural R. Rabin, QA Coordinator N. E. Sode-holm, Assistant Head Mechanical Design & Drafting H. S. Taylor, Assistant Head Quality Assurance Division i
S. A. Zych, Head Quality Control Division The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection for those present at the meeting.
Actions taken on the findings identified in previous inspections were also discussed along with the resolutions of i
these findings. Management representatives acknowledged the statements of the inspector.
l l
.