ML19310A077
| ML19310A077 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 03/27/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19310A070 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-277-80-04, 50-277-80-4, 50-278-80-04, 50-278-80-4, NUDOCS 8006060044 | |
| Download: ML19310A077 (2) | |
Text
___.
O APeEnoIx A
' NOTICE 0F VIOLATION Philadelphia Electric Company Docket Nos. 50-277 50-278 Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on February 22-23,25-29, 1980, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with conditions of your NRC License Nos. DPR-44 and DPR-56 as indi-cated below. These items are infractions.
A.
Technical Specification 6.8, " Procedures" states in part, that " Written procedures and administrative policies shall be established, implemented and maintained that meet the requirements of... Appendix A of... Regulatory Guide 1.33 (November 1972). Regulatory Guide 1.33, Section D.10 references procedures for maintaining containment integrity".
Further, each procedure and administrative policy...shall be reviewed by the PORC and approved by the Station Superintendent... prior to implementation...."
Contrary to the above, on February 22, 1980, a Round Sheet designed to assure containment integrity through administrative control of the seis-mically qualified nitrogen supply to containment ventilation valves was being used without incorporation into system procedures and without PORC review and approval.
B.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, " Corrective Action" states in part,
" Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality...
are promptly identified and corrected.
In the case of significant condi-tions adverse to quality, the measures shall assure that the cause of the condition is determined and corrective action taken to preclude repetition.
Contrary to the above, on January 3,1980, with Unit 2 in power operation and the drywell being de-inerted, two drywell ventilation valves were fully opened; and no procedural requirements had been imposed to restrict opening of containment ventilation system valves to an opening whereby closure against post LOCA conditions is assured. Further, the engineering review i
and identification of this deficiency had been completed on March 2,1979 l
and corrective action described in Philadelphia Electric Company's letter to Region I dated March 29, 1979 stated that openings of these valves are I
restricted, so the valves will only open to 30 degrees and that these operations were addressed in a system procedure.
C.
Technical Specification 6.8.1 states in part, " Written procedures and administrative policies shall be established, implemented and maintained...."
1.
Procedure A-14, " Plant Modification", Revision 6, dated August 5, l
1978, and subsequent revisions, states in part, "The Modification Coordinator shall ensure that all aspects of the design control have been initiated by use of the PCMS. He shall documen't the need for procedure, blocking sequence, and drawing revisions on the PCMS."
8 0 0 6 0 6 0 09t/
4 l
Appendix A 2
)
Contrary to the above, the need for required procedural revision was not documented on the Plant Modification Control Sheet (PCMS) for j
Modification 510(79-29), a modification initiated March 16, 1979.
2.
Procedure A-14, " Plant Modification" Revision 6, dated August 8, 1978 and subsequent revisions states in part, "An independent design review of proposed nuclear safety related modification shall be performed and documented by signing the design review provision of the PCMS."
Contrary to the above, the design review provision was not signed on the PCMS for Modification'510 (79-29), a safety related modification initiated March 16, 1979.
3.
Procedure A-26, " Procedure for Corrective Maintenance", Revision 21, dated February 14, 1980, states in part, "Use~of MRF:... Copy 2 shall be forwarded to the Control Operator.... TEii Entrol Operator shall...
prepare...the permit (Fom 196-21057) Philadelphia Electric Company Operating Handbook, Permits and Blocking).
If the technical specifi-cation "yes" block has been checked, on the Pemit Line Marked ' apparatus' write the words ' Tech Spec'...."
Contrary to the above, Local Pemit (Fom 196-21057) number 3-7C9-81, initiated on February 19, 1980, did not stipulate " Tech Spec", even though the technical specification "yes" block was checked on the associated MRF.
4.
Philadelphia Electric Company Station Operating Handbook--Permits and Blocking, Section 140A, Reprinted 1974, " Application of Blocking" states iii part, "The supervisor or his authorized representative doing the blocki.ng must take the original copy of the permit with him, perfom each item of blocking in the sequence entered on the permit, tag and record each item as it is done...."
Contrary to the above, on February 20, 1980, the individual performing the block associated with Local Permit #3-7C9-81 did not perform each item of blocking entered on the permit in that a different valve was closed and tagged in place of one of the valves required by the pemit.
.-_ - - s