ML19309G647

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 800411 Meeting W/Util in Glen Ellyn,Il Re Concerns Identified During NRC 800310-21 Special Appraisal of Site Health Physics Program & Util Actions to Resolve Concerns.List of Appraisal Concerns Encl
ML19309G647
Person / Time
Site: Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date: 04/15/1980
From: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Oconner J
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8005070296
Download: ML19309G647 (2)


Text

800soro g.

c't f"C o

n, u-rn n 64 "

ggi 3 3 gi u. I 71C APR 151980 Docket No. 50-295 Docket No. 50-304 Commonwealth Edison Company ATTN:

J. J. O'Connor President P. O. Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Gentlemen:

On March 10 through 21, 1980, the NRC conducted a special appraisal of the health physics program at the Zion Nuclear Generating Station as part of r'

an ongoing extensive effort in this area at all operating nuclear power plants in the country. The detailed report and findings of that inspec-tion will be forthcoming. However, because of concerns identified during this special inspection, you and I and members of our respective staffs met in our Region III office on April 11, 1980.

During this meeting, our major concerns, listed in the enclosure to this letter, were discussed in detail. This confirms that Commonwealth Edison Company has initiated action on certain of these concerns and will proceed expeditiously to resolve all concerns. We agreed to meet in approximately two weeks to discuss CECO's method of resolution, including completion dates, for each area.

We appreciate your cooperation in resolving these matters.

Sincerely, James G. Keppler Director

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/ encl:

Mr. D. L. Peoples, Director of Nuclear Licensing Mr. N. Wandke, Plant Superintendent Central Files Reproduction Unit NRC 20b PDR Local PDR NSIC TIC Mr. Lean Hansell, Office of Assistant Attorney General RI RII RIII RII Davis /pd Hei's No us ler l

4/14/80 pgy[(D

1 HEALTH PHYSICS APPRAISAL CONCERNS 1.

Improvement in the quality of the radiation protection progr,am through stronger management and management support.

2.

Vandalism which may adversely affect contamination cot trol, emergency communications, and laboratory analytical results.

3.

Identification of the source and extent of alpha contmaination seen in the refueling cavity.

4.

Personnel accountability and access control to auxiliary building and

S.

Improvement of contamination control.

6.

Identification and correction of sources of inplant radioactive gas leaks.

7.

Assurance of adequacy of training and instrument calibration as related to emergency response capabilities.

8.

Accelerated completion of the radwaste facility addition and safety review of the temporary demineralizer installation under accident conditions.

?

-