ML19309G304
| ML19309G304 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/07/1979 |
| From: | Trowbridge G SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | Case E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19309G305 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8005050536 | |
| Download: ML19309G304 (1) | |
Text
F- ; 4,4 8 P,0 5.0,5 0 $4 M
o g2 /k %
7*-
4 ki SH AW, PITTM AN, PoTTs & TROWB RIDG E 4
b:
isoo a sincer, u. w.
f N IA t' -<% ch.'.c.
w4 s m ucTo n. o. c. 2 o os e rS
"'~f'I.,t*2"' AN an",'Do"L C'!"
h%m
~
A GECeG C F. ? sow eesDGC JCMN ENGEL 1",.'A..fi'C h. o",S T..C.
12'::'." *;."n.N'o' ' "
'EL < co >< a
.M c.
=.
JAMES MAML
- 2. TeesCTM T MANLON postm?C.ZAMLER G E c eG C 64. BOG E A S. J A.
AICMan D C. G ALEN JCHN e. a sesse E LAasDER AOS E RT 3. AC SP SN S T'L'E SavC E ev. Co.w mCMILL Layman.FAmmAND t.'A.,, t."J "&' ' " '"-
",'C%i,01",'t,',i'n
-="'$~^*'****">
soc > Aa C J. m E N C ALL JC M N M. &N EILL,J R.
f CABLE *SMAwLAW*
AT..E. S.6 S t e.G J A.T A EPSTEEN
[
A A. A M.
c S S on, AN LN o.CMo G EORG E O. C nowLCT, m.
j G E C e G C v,. A L L E N. JIL JCM N M. SM ARON w as. e n A CnomETNCLOS DesCH A EL Q. M ATS Pa. [e en E m u A *e D-AkaSON NAT H A ss e E L m. B R E E D. J A.
STCw t N 88. LWCAS COUNSEL es Aan avg ENmLICR R AseD L. ALLCN E R N E S T L. S LA n t. JR.
A LA N J. W El $ $ A A D CA ALETC M S. JC N E S WILLI A h8 P.SAAA TMC as A S A. sa nT E R A t.A N p.TuSPEM
.AMCSM. DwmGEN JC M N L. C A N N. J 4.
S M E 6 3C *e J. w E t S E L PaesLip J. *s A#vC T J C M 84 A. eseCWLLouG M M AY L. BBCMM AN s AM E S TeeCas A S LENM ART May 7, 1979' Mr. Edson G.
Case Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Ed:
I am enclosing transcripts of interviews conducted by Metropolitan Edison with the TMI-2 operators on duty at the time of initiation of the TMI-2 accident.
The interviews were con-ducted on March 30, 1979, two days after the accident.
The transcripts were prepared from tapes of the interviews and have been reviewed by the interviewees.
The interviewees were first given the opportunity to review the initial transcripts of the tapes and to fill in garbled portions of the tapes and to
-3^
clean up some of the language employed.
They were then offered a final opportunity to review the product.
It is my understanding that this review process did not involve substantive changes in the taped remarks.
Copies of the original tapes have been supplied to the NRC investigative team.
Sincerel' Geor e F. Trowbridge Enclosures l
l m
e