ML19309D968

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to AEC 740723 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-313/74-10.Corrective Actions:Special Processes Procedures Reviewed & No Deficiencies Noted.Cognizant Personnel Notified of Log Violations.Shavings Will Be Analyzed
ML19309D968
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/14/1974
From: Phillips J
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Moseley N
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19309D926 List:
References
NUDOCS 8004110760
Download: ML19309D968 (2)


Text

a e

ry

  • l \ .

'q.,) '- ,

"y H GL PIN G GUILD ARKANSAS e.xa .

ARK ANS AS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY STH & LOUISl AN A STAEETS . UTTLE AOCK. A AK ANS AS 722O3 . (5013 372-4311 August 14, 1974 United States Atomic Energy Commission Directorate of Regulatory Operations Region II 230 Peachtree Street, N.W., Suite 818 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Attention: Mr. Norman Moseley Director Subj ect: Arkansas Power 6 Light Company Arkansas Nuclear One-Unit 1 s' ) License No. DPR-51

RO:II:MSK 50-313/74-10 Gentlemen:

We have reviewed your report dated July 23, 1974, and the following is our position on violations cited in that report:

I.A.I.a " Procedure Review of Special Processes" We have brought this to the attention of the Quality Control Engineer, Technical Support Engineer, and the Plant Safety Committee. We are now fully aware of the requirements. In the future, all procedures covered by procedure 1004.07, " Control of Speciel Processes," will be reviewed by cogni:: ant supervisors as per 1004.07 before getting final approval by the Plant Superintendent for implementation. 'Iherefore, we do not foresee a recurrence of this type of problem in the future.

Procedure 1701.01, " Repair of Incore Instrument 'Ibbes," has now been reviewed by the Quality Control Engineer and Technical Support Engineer and no deficiencies have been noted.

. I.A.1.c " Failure to Log Significant Annunciations"

,, As per a new revision to 1005.01, " Administrative Control Manual,"

Section 6.1.5.C.1.f.7, only those annunciations determined to be

()

[ \

significant by a licensed operator will be logged in the Station Log COPY SIMI TO: PDR 12DR /,

80 0 413 y ]f Q N5IC M //

1 1

1 i Mr. Norman Moseley August 14, 1974 '

\. -

The reactor building evacuation alarm that' occurred twice as mentioned .

in Details II, Paragraph 3(c) war caused by spurious radiation alarms and did not involve personnel evacuation. Any annunciations caused ,

by spurious alarms are not logged. As such, these two RB evacuation l alarms were not logged.

This violation has been brought to the attention of the Operations Supervisor and other cognizant personnel and we do not foresee a recur-rence of this typo of problem in the future.

I.A.2.b " Failure to document inspection of socks placed over the ends of incore tube nozzles to catch cuttings during flushing" 1

At the time we felt that no useful analysis could be made of the '

cuttings contained by these socks; that is, there was not a way to correlate the shavings in the sock with metal taken off in the core. i However, we are aware of this generic requirement, and in the future l we will comply with this requirement. l Very truly yours, b' -#

h '

I

/ vJ. ,D. Phillips Senior Vice President JDP:lt l

l i

$i l

1 l l l  :

l l

l bi e i

t v .

I

=- e w- . . - , - . .- . ew - - -