ML19309C880
| ML19309C880 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch, Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 02/06/1980 |
| From: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | John Miller GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004090349 | |
| Download: ML19309C880 (2) | |
Text
i gas arcy
'o UNITED STATES
~,
l y, cg*(,g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- ); g.T, 4 c- [c REGION 11 56 j j.;
101 M A R lE TT A ST., N.W.. $UIT E 3100 d
0,
%
- be e
AT LANTA, G EORGIA 30303 In R p y Refer To:
RII:JPO 50-321, 50-366
~~2 t _30-424, 50 425
Georgia Power Company Attn:
J. 11. Miller, Jr.
Executive Vice President 270 Peachtree Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Gentlemen:
Enclosed is IE Bulletin No. 80-03, which requires action by you with regard to your reactor facility (ies) with an operating license or a construction permit.
Should you have questions regarding this Bulletin or the actions required of you, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
[/ James P. O'Reilly Director
Enclosures:
1.
List of Recently Issued IE Bulletins s"
I 6
8005090 3y9
l fG G 150 s
i.
j.
Georgia Power Company l ec w/ enc 1:
M. Manry, Plar.t Manager Post Office Box 442 Baxley, Georgia 31513 T. E. Belflower Site QA Supervisor Post Office Box 442 Baxley, Georgia 31513 K. M. Gillespie Construction Project Manager Post Office Box 282 evnesboro, Georgia 30830 t
D. Groover 4 Site Supervisor iost Office Box 282 Vaynesboro, Georgia 30830 W. A. Widner, General Manager Nuclear Generation Georgia Power Company Post Office Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 I
e O
l b
I e
,e U
g th, '
'n i
a a
I p
1 i -
i.
j
SSINS No.:
6820 UNITED STATES Accessions No.:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7912190669 0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555 February 6, 1980 IE Bulletin No. 80-03 LOSS OF CHARC0AL FROM STANDARD TYPE II, 2 INCH, TRAY ADSORBER CELLS Description of Circumstances:
During preliminary leak tests of charcoal adsorber cells in certain ventilation systems at Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, it was determined that on certain adsorber cells the spacing between rivets securing the perforated screen to the casing was too great to ensure adequate contact between the casing and the screen, thus allowing charcoal to escape.
The problem was discovered when s visual inspection detected loose charcoal on the floor of the filter housings and on the outside horizontal surfaces of the adsorber cells.
Loss of charcoal was also indicated by observation of light penetrating through the cells. Additional inspection revealed that the rivets securing the perforated screens to the cell casing were approximately six inches apart and the screen appeared to be sagging away from the casing between rivets.
The particular adsorber cells being tested at Sequoyah Nuclear Plant were Flanders Type II pre-1974 fabrication.
There is a possibility that design of adsorber cells with wide spacing between screen rivets may pass initial freon leak tests but degrade significantly during operation thus reducing the margin of safety during postulated accidents.
b The responses from this Bulletin will be used by the NRC to evaluate need for more frequent inspection / testing.
For all power reactor facilities with an Operating License:
i 1.
Determine if charcoal adsorber cells in use, or proposed for use, have
~
the potential for a loss of charcoal incidental to handling, storage or use (as appropriate).
Particular attention should be directed to examina-tion of a) rivet spacing resulting in separation of screen and cell housing and b) adsorber cell or filter housing deformation causing loss of charcoal and/or channeling. Either of these items could result in a degraded filtration system incapable of performing its intended function.
The preferred method of this determination is a visual inspection of the filter housing and adsorber cells as described in Section 5 of AN,SI N510-1975.
If this method is not feasible, state in_the report required by Paragraph 4 how the determination was made:
6 c
2.
For ESF filtration systems, any identified defective cellr shall be replaced and the operability of the system (after cell replacement) i O
m,
.m aer t -.e-4 se eW-w*
- N
- r'
I i
I IE Bulletin No. 80-03 February 6, 1980 Page 2 of 2 demonstrated by leak testing within 7 days.
Preferred method of leak testing is as described in Regulatory Guide 1.52 and Section 12 of ANSI N510-1975.
3.
For normal ventilation exhaust filtration systems which employ charcoal adsorber cells and for which radioactive removal efficiency has been ausumed in determining compliance with the "as low as reasonably achievable" design criteria of 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, any identified defective cells shall be replaced as soon as possible but at least within 30 days. After replacement, the system should be demonstrated operable by leak testing within an additional 30 days. Preferred method of testing is as described in Regulatory Guide 1.140 and Section 12 of ANSI N510-1975.
4.
Report in writing within 45 days of the date of this Bulletin the mesults of the determination required by Paragraph 1.
The report shall include the type of cells employed (manufacturer and cell design), system containing the cells, observed cell condition (degradation / sagging) and a discussion of visual inspection procedure and results.
3 For all Power Reactor Facilities with a Construction Permit:
1.
Visual inspection shall be conducted only if the charcoal adsorber cells have been purchased and shipment received.
A representative number (approximately 5) of each type of cell design / manufacturer shall be visually inspected for such deficiencies ao rivat : pacing and screen / casing separation which could lead to loss of charcoal incidental to handling, storage, or use.
2.
Report in writing within 45 days of the date of this Bulletin the results of the inspection required by Paragraph 1.
The report shall include the type of cells (manufacturer and cell design), observed cell condition (degradation / sagging) and a discussion of the inspection procedure and results.
Reports shall be sent to the Director of the appropriate NRC Regional Office listed in Appendix D of 10 CFR 20 with a copy of the Director, Division of 1
Fuel Facility and Materials Safety Inspection, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, USNRC, Washington, D.C.
20555.
Approved by GAO, B180225(R0072); clearance expires, 7/31/80. Approval was given under a blanket clearance specifically for identified generic problems.
i t
4 m
l
(
O e
IE Bulletin No. 80-03 Enclosure February 6, 1980 RECENTLY ISSUED IE BULLETINS Bulletin Subject Date Issued Issued To No.
80-03 Loss of Charcoal from 2/6/80 All power reactor Standard Type II, 2 Inch, facilities with an Tray Adsorber Cells OL or a CP 80-02 Inadequate Quality 1/21/80 All BWR licenses with Assurance for Nuclear a CP or OL 80-01 Operability of ADS Valve 1/11/80 All BWR power reactor Pneumatic Supply facilities with and OL 79-01B Environmental Qualification 1/14/80 All power reactor of Class IE Equipment facilities with an OL 79-28 Possible Malfunction of 12/7/79 All power reactor Namco Model EA 180 Limit facilities with an Switches at Elevated OL or a CP Temperatures 79-27 Loss Of Non-Class-1-E 11/30/79 All power reactor Instrumentation and facilities holding Control Power System Bus OLs and to those During Operation nearing licensing 79-26 Boron Loss From BWR 11/20/79 All BWR power reactor Control Blades facilities with an OL 79-25 Failures of Westinghouse 11/2/79 All power reactor BFD Relays In Safety-Related facilities with an Systems OL or CP 79-17 Pipe Cracks In Stagnant 10/29/79 All PWR's with an (Rev. 1)
Borated Water System At OL and for information PWR Plants to other power reactors 79-24 Frozen Lines 9/27/79
. All power reactor facilities' which have L,
either OLs or cps and 6
are in the late stage of construction l
l l
m