ML19309B700

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 99900372/79-01 on 790807-10 & Notice of Deviation
ML19309B700
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/22/1979
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Plate W
ANACONDA CO. (DIV. OF ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO.)
Shared Package
ML19309B692 List:
References
REF-QA-99900372 NUDOCS 8004070087
Download: ML19309B700 (2)


Text

_.

$A4 h[ 5EL.-

/R

(7s

[.

(

UNITED STATES d

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o-E-

REGION IV

,g 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000 C

p_,

p

%*****,e ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76012 j

2 2 AUG 1979 Docket No. 99900372/79-01 Y.

The A

- Compa::7 Cw-P-=

and t'ahh Corporation -

,[

AIT5r - Tr._ T. Plata Vir-w -+-. h c=M a J a..

Gr

".i3 D

Gra- -

r 05330 Gene 1 -

- This W xa the QA Program inspection conducted by Mr. W. E. Foster of this v

-- on. August 7-10, 1979, of your facility at York, Pennsylvaria, assocL-- a wit ~a the nannF=ature of wire and cable and to tha discussions of our f4-dywith. Mr.JL Filina and_ members of your staff at the concInsion of. the 4-Won.

I This inspection was nada to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA Progr'an is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being j

implemented; nor to-assure that a specific product, component or service provided by you to your customers, is of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components or services procured from others.

l Yo,u should therefore not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licenses or his agents nor from taking effective cor-rective action in responsa to their findings.

Areas exanined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interriews with personnel, and observations by the j

inspector, i

l During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA Pr,ogram failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references 'f to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter. '

Please provida us within thirty (30). days of y:; receipt of this report a written statement containing,.(1) a dc.cription of steps thct have been or will-be taken to correct thesa'itens, (2) a description of steps that have been or l

will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective actions.

and preventive measures were or will be completed.

I E

OQ O

l

_J m A.l h D~

L t

  • .y 8@94$7@G87

.a

Q.

The Anaconda-Company 2

In accordance with Section'2.790 of the Commission's " Rules of Pre.ctice,"

Part 2, Title ~10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter with enclosure and your reply, together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed ia the Commission's Public Document-Room.

If this report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make

.a written. application within thirty (30) days to this office to withhold such

. informnH nn from public. disclosure.

Any such application must include a full stat =nr of the_ raa=nnaion the basis of which it is claimed that the informa-tion!1s p.vydetary, and.should be prepared so that proprietary information idenH#4r'd in-the application is contained in a separate part of the document.

If we.do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed -in the Public Document Room. -

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, A

W Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Deviation 2.

Inspection-Report No. 99900372/79-01 cc: The Anaconda Company Continental Wire and Cable Corporation ATTN:

Mr. R. Filius Gulton Road York, Pennsylvania 17404 sSQ&%

I

%g*

w 4

. _.,