ML19308E173

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Review Areas Re Technical Competency of Util as Owner,Operator & Const Manager,Technical Competency of Const Contractors & Emergency Plans.Basic Proposed Organizational Structural Indicates Util Will Be Technically Competent
ML19308E173
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River, 05000303  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/1968
From: Rizzo A
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Ross D
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8003240701
Download: ML19308E173 (3)


Text

_

c u.-ex.;g 2-

..y; w.

.m-n.:.r. n 2

+~-

w r ',

u x.

'3

^

w'

?

\\ n

.. s r

  • ~

< ~ ;a:

L 3.

7 i-

.s_ 4,

+-+

e n'

s n

..a Denwood F. Ross, Jr.-

Janumry 2, l966 Reactor Projoct Eranch /3. DHL TERU: GDadleyThapson, Chief Cperational Safety Branch, DP1

':A. J. Ri::o n

' Operational Oakty Branch, DIL 0

b vvI CarsTAL RIVEN, DOCKET 12 50-302 and 50-303 myg7

--.J Ref(A) limorandum fra Foter A. Morris "DP1 Review Areas for Florida _ Power Corporation's Crystal River Units 3 and 4; Docket Kos. 50-302 and 50-303." Datai October 2, 1967 This will surmrize cr/ verbal comments relative to the review areas assignM trf ref (A) to Reacter Operaticns. The aress cen:;idered veres a.

Technical c:::petane;f uf the applicant, as wner, operat,vr ed e nctruction =anager, b.

Technical ccepstency of cons!,ruction ocntractors, c.

heran=: plant i=r u=Lts 3 and 4.

Tec'r.ical en.catancy cf the applicant as cuner, operst:r and a.

r ennstructicn r,ans;;cr.

1.

Omr - Ino basic engineering staff and crganizational structure propeced indiestes that "C will be technically ecmpetent, as cimer.-

2.

Ocerator Eased on the organizational structure shown in secticn 12 and assu:: ting that the five shift persennel indicated are for operation of both plants the shift operating crew is inadequate.

The shift crew consists of a shift supervisor, watch engineer, centrol ccater cperator, assistant centrol center operator aid -

one equipe:ent operator. At present, singlo plant crews cocaist',

of a minimum of four not including health physics technicians sad instnanentatica technicians that N_cr be assigned on a shift basic. Further clarification cf the dus1 plant operational mode is required. In addition, it is necessary to deternine the actions required by the shift crew in the event of a decign basis accident in one plant -hile assuning that:the second plant renh operatienal.

On tbls basia alone the crew sir; indented vculd be inadcounte.

It is therefore necessary that the applicant dafine his proposed site aparational medes in the normal and abnormal cases before a finding of adequacy of the prcpossd cperating crganizatica can be a:aca ror cgpicnt, oper stion.

2.n to coing :t 13-essentiaa scs; oma >

m.

W3 24_09A/V k.

m. a > -

n

.( "(

v MTT > I.....L

'.4.7? W.MO-

)

~

N.

~

,*, tAs.cousumusnTramnesamtEasse-o-2we.s N

~

Th-:

~ f, ;.. %%

y s

-~

t.

n-

.-. v

_... ~

s o.

t D. F. Ross, Jr. January 2,1968 the duties of each crev menber be clearly defined.

The fundsnental crganizaticnal structure prcposed for plant cperation is satiefactory. However, it la important to raccgnico that tha plant superintenient, assistant plant superintendent, naintenance engineer, operaticus engineer and technical support engineera will be respaisible Dr both plants. The total conplement of 59 perscns for this staff is the usual number designated for operation of a single facility. Although the basic structure is organizationally satisfactorf, the nur.ber of pecple in each group is narginally satisfactory and does not appear to consider normal unavailability of key personnel due to sickness or other causes. For dual plant oporation the staff will have to bs increased, prier to schieving full cpersti.:n cf bcth plac.ts.

It is rs:cogniud ths; accrotion of unit f4 is arpected to fcllo r unit J3 hf about two years.

The crganization as propcscd is satisfactarf fcc initial singlo plant cperation of unit f3 3

Ccnstructicn Manager A review of 3*cticn 1.6,. acetica 12 and apiandix 1A incicatas that Florida Powcr Cerocration can act as its c.m censi:,ruction ao aanspr.

3pscificaticus f;r ra%r rn=ent and c;rne:c vill be D

D furnt :,9 dv the A /S ( ?'.lb rt Acaciatea). M24cr ecul m at u n1 vw1 bo prvou ed by Florida Pour Co-p;raticn, Purchr.ai5g Dept. 2 :d l

on epecificatiana cre,wred g t 5 A/2. IT.i will heign, canufacture, D

f and deliver ta i;he alta the cen;;:leta nuclear stcan Ocpply >:y::te:

hab Dand will furnish technical ccnaltatica curing erectian, ini;1al

,"c fuol loading, testing, and initial etartup of the nuclear st an npply cy::te a.

b.

Technical caupetency of the constructica coatractort The PSAR does not indicate the detail breakdown cf the construction contractors to be used. However, under de ailed cupervision of Florida Power Corp. construction engineering staff and with engineering s

nanagenent assistance frco Gilbert Associates Inc,, l't is expected that satisfactory surveillance with assurance of nocting design specifications during construction can ba achicvod. As ialicated in ppcndix 5D

... Final reconsibility for utaclishing quality centrol procchres and enforcing such precedures belunga to flerida Pcwor Corporation".

Energency Plans for unit f3 and f4 c.

The applicant briefly notes that emergency plans and procedures will be prepared and that appropriate drills will be cenducted. No rention is made as to the scope and extent of such planning required during-the It, la i.e, wded tM t-a b:icf o nline he prepar^d omer hw s m.s i,im yL....tha pr@ cae4.71pr.ida 2.qw.g.,C_orn,.Ecerdney...P1a.n Jaetions requireid at 'the seccnd site while the design basis accident has sumuc >cecL W.at,.thi firtt..reactJ;r, LLperli.cular_desJ.gn featuree _ should

,g..... reviewed to mesure that the pnposed.aporating staff for the dua,l

..a i

- 1As.sovta=umrewmmsomcs tNtwes -

a-

.w:a;m~...w.,e. m~.n,n.: 7 c w.~ g g g.m p wm

. -~ m,

  1. ..;; W. :=.:

' 9 q%..:.wp..

a-r

.C

.- W W g ;; g @

, e g:.

-, g.

L-1 g,.p. v..

.a_,

.y r+.*

'e

.,e.4..+.=,~..

p.

'"3

  • * ~

'..g,_

- )gs

"\\

1

, gr ';%

= ~.

.. = >. '.

.. Ay 9 w

-v 3..

,. =..

.3-y 7

.y g_

r

^'l)-

., ' ~ ~ _

~ y.,' *" Q;< ll, -

~ 3:2 1 Q g_ y % %,+

s.

r s

a f"~} + ;.

.,C n-

?

,-..a.:uv 2

xv....,,....e e

n

. +

. 9

--x,

.m.

-~.

- D. F.' ]tess,' Jr.

. -3 January:2, 19 6

~

facility cen in fact implement the propcsed plan. The plan should provide the applicant's operational philosophy'in regard to operation-of the unaffected plant subsequent to the accident. The outline should provide infomation on the followings 1.

Basis for emergency planning.

2.

FPC Emergency organization with brief description of responsibilities and authority.

3 In plant instrunentation to be used for identification of the extent and nature of an off-site release.

A Coordination with local, state, federal authorities.

5 Medical provisions made for treating and handling contaminated perscnnel.

6, General. concept of. recovery; planning subsequent to design babis accident at one facility.

1 1

l l

i f

4 1

-L,,

.O

, 4.4 4+

,.,n.

-,c D

D,I

. m',

.7"*

e

. e,-

~

m m

y

.. w,,e,

}

p n

o

'~0

. T y

b j

D

.s O

+ e u'

~

~2 4 i + 4"d '

)..,

.e :s s

. ;+

,s e.- w _,

.-y

-. f.:,;; -

....- w.

t

, 9:C * 0,t" s, <;

. - _ s> l

~

E "~

~ c. oma >

.(Q,.. ;.

o Q:,; _.-

,.x7

'.~~.:.

';X~g q e-w. >

t i NM>

t,,

~

p.

':'.i. ). Q q

..,c [ g.?' m f.s..

.l

. 2.

m s.

..-.t.

_h

  • l u'~ W%M' n

_. =..

_= +- "

~ ~:n~ & y

~

'..um Aschase..y(mov.s es ;n a r;:

e-

~ ~

a p,,yg:,.r Je. ;,,:p:yy*astausessreamussexxaw2weae.;.,6. w ~

c c, %.,. c

_.u. s.,

~

^

wt'c a p p.L

.m

, a r....w

-u,,,,,

~..- m km.4%r4,W W w s v M4k.a.et,J'M CAh-s*-rw".w

-.% a :.ww.am:s : w-%. e:: v*- ~

.e w?

-