ML19308E012
| ML19308E012 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 12/07/1971 |
| From: | Comegys W JUSTICE, DEPT. OF |
| To: | Schur B US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| 60-415-38, NUDOCS 8003200746 | |
| Download: ML19308E012 (2) | |
Text
_ _
4m
(
Pnou:
DATE OF DOCUMENT:
DATE RECEWED N O.:
[
Department of Justice 12-7-71 12-9-71 Washington, D. C.
205Y rT
. EM o;
.E,0.T, oTNm Walker. B. Comogys TO:
ORIG.;
CC; OTN EJL I
Bertram H. Schur ACT10M NECE$$ARY O
CO~Cu aat~Ce O
O^rE x~swEa ED:
NO ACTION NECES$ARY O CC==E~r O
= <:
CLAS$1F:
POST OFF6CE FILE CODE:
U 50-302 (Aun-TausT nLs)
REG,No*
DESCRIPTION:(Mu$t 64 VRCla5Sitted)
REFERRED TO DATE RECENED SY DATE Ltr advising study of applicant's Braitman 12-9-7 L proposed activities has raised certain gf2 ey, fm. ACPTON questions...addl & more detailed info will be submitted la:er.....
Diss nimrrTm-
{
"" C"' * * * '5; wm
- ?/ Reg Files Liedquist(OGC,Rm F 506A)
- ~ ~
Arc pnn Echur(OGC, P_m P SC6A1(61 Compliance (2)
- 5. Robinson (2)
ASLB(Yore "H" St) 2)
L. Johnson. SLR JO NOT.-~ " ~!
m en.er Karas RamAnas:
DeYoung N. Dubs 1 Local PDF.(Crystal River 9 Fla)
NSIC(Buchanan) fod I
u.s. Arouse sumGY CcMMISSION MAllCONTROL FORM FOau A.ECsass is. on
$ U.S. GO VERNMEN T PRIN TING OFFICEt 1970-406-979 8003200 N b
,s
'ff PU (**TORNEY CENCA1. '
A TITWIT DIVI?,10N
[cpttritttetti of 3ttstice
%51inston, D.C.
2053a 1
? 3 71
,k. n.!if ?:.
/ 3'
, m.. N
/->
A ', ' f '. '%
Bertram H. Schur, Esquire Associate General Counsel
./> hg United States Atomic Energy Comission
- 9
'i '
(.
-/ l$m Washington, D. C.
20545 3
lG
.n h _,
T.":,
6' 5.-i C.9lL;';. 5,*-
a Re:
Florida Power Corporation Crystal River Unit No. 3
'y,Q,.
's. 2 AEC Docket No. 50-302 w,y,G,
N Department of Justice File 60-415-38 c-s._...-
Dear Mr. Schur:
You have requested our advice pursuant to the pro-visions of Section 105 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as recently) amended by 68 Stat. 919, 42.U.S.C. 2011-2296 19, 1970, in regard P.L.91-560, 84 Stat. 1472 (December to the above cited application.
~
Our study of applicant's proposed activities under the license has raised certain questions which have been discussed with the applicaat.
Applicant has indicated its desire to resolve them prior to formal submission of our advice to the Comission, in the hope that this action will make possible advice that an antitrust hearing would not be required.
Because it appears possible to resolve this matter satisfactorily within a few weeks, we deem it appropriate to pursue the matter further with the applicant.
We will communicate additional, more detailed, advice to the Comission in the next several weeks.
Sincerely yours,.q
'J f
m.0P h*ln[/,,
Yl t::ma
/
'C'i WALKER B. COMEGYS
\\
Acting Assistant Attorney General twc g
N Antitrust Division J ha M/] > C.
<I RECT!L8 toy 9
% acm3 p/
,A - ECS CU.t;{ j'd,/
~&u G[0 h
1