ML19308D976
| ML19308D976 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 07/03/1974 |
| From: | Rodgers J FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| To: | Muller D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19308D977 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003200718 | |
| Download: ML19308D976 (5) | |
Text
-
AEC DI.".IBUTION FOR PART 50 DOCKET MAT 7 _A_L, S.
/;-
5 (TEMPORARY FORM)
CONTROL NO 6187 FILE:
ENVIRO FROM:
DATE OF DOC.
DATE REC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER h
Florida Power Corporation St. Petersburg, FL J. T. Rodgers 7-3-74 7-8-74 X
TO:
ORIG CC OTHER SENT AEC PDR XXX SENT LOCAL PDR XXX Daniel R. Muller 1 signed CLASS UNCLASS PROP INFO INPUT NO CYS REC'D DOCKET NO:
XXX XXX 1
50-302 DESCRIPTION:
ENCLOSURES:
Ltr re meeting of 5-1-74 trans the following...
Rev pgs to the Enviro Tech Specs....
ACKNOWLEDGED DONOT RF40VE PLANT NAME: CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT #3 (25 cys enc 1 rec'd) j FOR ACTION /INFCPl'ATION 7-11-74 GMC BUTLER (L)
ISCIMENCER(L)
ZIEXANN(L)
!REGAN(E)
W/ Copier.
W/ Scopies info W/ Copies W/$ Copies CLAf5*(L)
STOLZ(L)
DICKER (E)
LEAR (L)
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies PARP(f. )
Vuea m(T.)
m m m f;)
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W_
Uopics ICiIEL(L)
PURPLE (L)
YOUNGBLOOD(E)
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies
( TEEG FfTS _
INTJ?RNAL DISTRTE"TICN
/
TSCH REVIEW
/ ENTON LIC ASST A/T IND
- iEG FDR HENDRIE RIMES BRAITMAN f
V 0GC, ROOM P-506A SCHROEDER AMMILL DICGS (L)
SALTZMAN
,s
'j
/
MUCTZING/ STAFF MACCARY STNER GEARIN (L)
B. HURT CASE KNIGHT BALLARD GOULBOURNE (L)
PLANS GIAMBUSSO PAWLICKI SPANGLER KREUTZER (E)
MCDONALD BOYD SHA0 LEE (L) 1100RE (L)(BWR)
STELLO ENVIRO MAIGRET (L)
) CHAPMAN DUBE w/inuut DIYO'"'0(L)(IVR)
HOUSTON MULLER REED (E)
E. COUPE ' j SKOVi!OLT (L)
NOVAK DICKER SERVICE (L)
G9LLER(L)
ROSS KNICHTON SHEPPARD (L)
D. THOMPS P. COLLINS
/IPPOLITO YOUNGELOOD SLATER (E)
KLECKER DESISE
- TEDESCO (2)
REGAN SMITH (L)
EISENHU7 j
/ REC OPR LONG PROJECT LDR TEETS (L)
/
FILE T, REGION (3)
LAINAS SELLS (2)
WILLIAMS (E)
/
j MORRIS BENAROYA HARLESS WILSON (L)
STE'1E VOLI1tER EXTERNAL DISTR 1LUTICN
- LCO?.L IDR CRYSTAL RIVER, FL,
- TTC (ABERNATHY)
,/(1)(QQ(H3-NATICNAL LAB'S 'PNWL l'
- N3IC(ECCHidIAN) 1-ASI.LP(C/U Bldg,Rm 529)
)
1 - ASLB l-W. PZNNINGTON, Rm E-201 GT c
1 - P. R. DAVIS (AEROJET NUCLEAR) 1-CONSULTANT' S 16 - CYS ACRS HOLDING NEWMARK/BTZ4E/AGBABIAN 1-GERALD ULRIKSCN...ORNL 1-B & M SWINEBROAD, Rm E-201 GT 8 o 0320 07d
.. ~
~
~.
.s.
m
$.8!
M
.P.o..w...e.r July 3, 1974 g
N.
7' 4,Y th
,a
' k'[.
7
\\)
T
'2. I 3
0 Mr. Daniel R. Muller C
"s. O
,d, v'/,.. ' J ' ' dl d i Assistant Director for
,C-/
' 4, Q.77* A '- l Environmental Projects
,(//
5e
'd Directorate of Licensing
.A'N U.S. Atomic Energy Comission 6
~,
.,-}'
~ ' : '_r
Subject:
Florida Power Corporation Crystal River Nuclear Generating Plant Docket No. 50-302
Dear Mr. Muller:
As a result of our meeting of May 1,1974, with Mr. Sells of your staff, Florida Power Corporation has prepared responses and, as necessary, changes to our proposed Environmental Technical Speci-fication for Crystal River Unit #3.
These changes are fonnatted as revised pages to the Environmental Technical Specifications and followed by a comments section. Also
/'
included are the staff comments sequentially numbered which corres-pond to areas changed or commented on in the Technical Specifications.
Forty copies are provided for your staff review.
Please feel free to contact us if further discussion or clarification is needed.
Very truly yours, J.I.Rodgers
[
Asst. Vice President
/
JTR/iw
/
\\
MULATORYDOCKHf a wpy /
a General Office 3201 Thirty-fourtn street soutn. P.O. Box 11042, st. Petersburg. Florida 33733.
~
W.
s
.t I!Altr l e...
I/11/74 D. ScU n Envi r oninent.nl l'ro,)octn - 11 rant li 4, T.
CRYSTAI. RIVER NUCf. EAR CENERATitS PLANT PROPOSED 1:NVIR0201ENTA[.
j.
Ti:'l::tCAr. Spec rie tCATjoNS (DOCI'f:T No. 50 ~302)
,/
G' ' 8, ty, r
Following are :ome commentu on I he aliove envi ronmental t h,1ns tea l,
gM.
5.
q, i
i specificationn.
. gg M. : -.f.r>
g
.c.
..%'y D,f %. ;. /,\\/
Section 1.0 - Definitions (h
1.
Definitien 1.2 - Environmental Protection Conditions inay be cNfuning
)
1 as the forward speaks too limiting conditions of oper.. tion. A bet.:.cr definition would be for the term " Limiting Conditions of Operatio.'.
2.
In metion 1.2.3 the definition of terms used to specify frequency shoul.d be clarified to indicate that the interval specified Lc a plus or minus value.
(3) 3.
A definit. ton of abnormat power operation unun1a de niven..
(
4.
Define known radioactive sottree.
Section 2.1.1 - Maximum Delta T Across Condensers (I) 1.
A specification should be given lintting the temperature rise to
,,,f some maximum valite during the given 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> period.
fh 2.
The specification should specify limits for plant operation during
~
abnormal operating conditions.
a s
G h0r l[D
<L
~
1
6:
JUL 3 79b -3 ct, s
c[.~.:d tr um G.L87 w
/
REGULATORY DOCKETFILE C0P :
...,. ~.
n
. : *i, -
K
_r
...t..~...
. Section 2.1.2 - Maximum DIncharge_Temperaturc f7) 1,.
A maximum value should he npeelf red for the discharne-semperature
/
for the period of.1 hoort: allowed presently.
2.
The monitoring requirement should include a manual back-up system.
Section 2.3.1 - Blocides
/
1.
There should be a monitoring station at the POD to determine compliance with the specification.
((O) 2.
Is the icyc1 of 1.8 ppm chlorine in the individual condenser outint.
s.
water boxes to be considered a specification?
Section 2.3.2 - Corronion Inhibitors (l/
1.
As the present system does release some amounts of corrosion inhibitors there should be some form of monitoring program for long term effects.
1 Section 2.4 - Radioactive Discharc s, a
1.
The present specifications place no limits on dissolved nobic gases in 7
liquid effluents.
. ** 9
/
3) 2.
The terms " monitored and".:hould be inserten af ter th<. words "shall be" In the fJrut line of specification 2.4.1.C.2.
}
3.
The term " representative" should be inserted before the word " sample" j
in the flent I tne of IIquid ef fluent monitoring terpii.cment A.
- 1.
D.
s 3-4.
Tu there a trumm.it f un nign mit:: Ing before Qt.lu npecif f. cation 2.4.2. A.?
o l
S.
Camma branchinn ratios should be nper Irred in table 2.4-2.
_Section 3.0 - Design Features
( t7) 1.
Tante 3.3-1 shou 1d regresent the maximum a11ouaste amounts or chee1=ais to be discharged from the plants.
/
h 2.
The test wells mentioned in section 3.3 shou 1d be. included in a
~
monitoring p'rogram in section 4.0.
-~
Section 4.0 - Environmentai Surveiltance
()
1.
There is no radiostrontium ana1ysis on the air particulate s:amples.
2.
Tabte 4.2-4 should be removed as it does not retate to any specifica-tion in the document.
- M N
= = - -
- f m
"