ML19308D972
| ML19308D972 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 02/05/1973 |
| From: | Dircks W COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY |
| To: | Gardner G, Muller D INTERIOR, DEPT. OF, US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003200714 | |
| Download: ML19308D972 (3) | |
Text
_-
~.
AEC DNIBUTION FOR PART 50 DOCxzT Mr%IAL (TEMPORARY FORM)
CONTROL NC; 988 ENVIRO FROM:
DATE OF DOC:
DATE REC'D LTR MEMO RPr CrniER
. Executive Office of'the President Council on Environmental Quality 2-5-73 2-8-73 x
W f'flMA h Birks 20006 6
'Io:
D. R. Muller SENT LOCAL PDR X
i CIASS:
QMPROP I5F0 INPUT NO CYS REC'D
, DOCKET EO 1
50-302 -
DESCRIPIION:
ENCLOSURES:
Memo summarizing the major points discussed at the meeting w/CEQ on 2-1-73......
DIST:
Per.D. Muller /Harless PLANT NAMES: C,rystal River Unit # 3 FOR ACTION /INFORMATION 2-9-73 toe BUTLER (L) s -SCHWENCER(L)
SCHEMEL(L)
KNIGBTON(E)
W/ Copies W/1 Co CLARK (L)
STOLZ(pies W/ Copies W/ Copies L)
ZIEMANN(L)
YOUNGBID0D(E)'
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies GOLLER(L)
VASSALID(L)'
CHITWOOD(FM)
REGAN(E)~
i j
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/-
ies W/ 4 Copies
~ KNIEL(L)
H. DENION
.DICKERE)
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Cq11es INTERHAL DISTRIBUTION
[xw FILE 3 TECH REVIEW VOLIMER
.e. HARLESS 6
E peux run uuwRIE DENTON SHAFER F&M OGC, ROOM P-506A SCHROEDER GRIMES F&M BROWN E
4 MUNTZING/ STAFF MACCARY GAMMILL EMEIEY 4.-G. WILLIAMS E CASE KNIGHT (2)
KASTNER NUSSBAUMER E. GOULBOURNE L GIAMBUSSO PAWLICKI BALLARD A
IND BOYD-L(BWR)
SHAO SPANGLER LIC ASST.
A EYOUNG-L(PWR)
KNUTH SERVICE L SALTZPAN SKOVHDLT-L STELIO ENVIRO MASON L
P. COLLIIE MOORE MULLER WILSON L
PLANS HOUSTON DICKER MAIGRET L FfCI551TALD REG OPR TEDESCO KNIGEON SMITH L
DUBE yFILE& REGION (2)
IDNG YOUNGBIDOD GEARIN L
) ORRIS LAINAS PROJ 1EADER DIGGS L
INFO STEELE BENAROYA TEES L
CTELES y
LE L
w REGAN EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION
- -l-IDCAL PDR, Crystal River, Fla 1-UfIE(ABEMATHY l-NSIC(BUCHANAN))
- - (1)M-NATIONAL LAB'S PNWL 1-FDR-SAN /LA/N' 1-R. CARROLL-0C, GT-B227 1-GERALD LELIf l.ASLB-YORE /SAYRE WOODWARD [H.ST.
el-R. CATLIN, E-256-GT BROOKHAVEN 1-CONSULANr'S 1-AGMED(WALT 16-CYS ACRS HOLDING NEWMARK/BLUME/AGABIAN Em C 427i 1-ED...MUIm 8 0 0 3 2 0 0 7 /</
g
-:W u e
E'
- UTIVE OFFICE oF THE PRESIDEF')
50-302 CuUNCll. ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
~
722 JACKSON PLACE. N.
W.
~
d 's
--WASHINGTON. D. C. 20006 H[-
1 e
February 5,1973 N8g hh MEMORANDUM FOR MR. GEORGE GARDNER 7l
. Department of the Interior MR. DANIEL MULLER U.S. Atomic Energy Commission
SUBJECT:
Crystal River Nuclear Plant This is a brief memorandum to summarize the major points discussed at the meeting-here at CEQ on Thursday, February 1, 1973 on the subject of the Crystal River Plant.
The representativesof the Department of the Interior outlined a number of potentially serious environmental problems that they felt could occur if the Crystal River Nuclear Unit #3 were permitted to operate as proposed by the ut:ility.
These problems centered principally around:
l l
The effect of the long cooling water intake canal on movement of aquatic organism tlu:ough the Crystal River Bay.
The entrainment of small fish and other organisms through the plant's cooling system.
I The impact of the heated water discharges on the j
ecological balance of the bay.
t AEC agreed to request the Florida Power Company to submit
}
to the Commission within a 30 day period,.if possible, a
detailed and comprehensive study outline to investigate
- r.
the three major potential impact areas.
The company would 3
also be asked to prepare a detailed engineering design 2
feasibility study of alternative means of cooling the plant j complex to be prepared concurrently with the comprehensive study.
988 i
~
-. ~ - -
~--.- -- -
)
.../. R
'4 V
~
L
s :.- y e p : w a:
~
i T. ~..
s..
n.-
, a..,
- ~
r',
2 --
AEd agree $1 to consult with Interior on the material to be submitted by the utility and to schedule a meeting with the utility in order to make suggestions for improving and strengthening the utility's study outline.
A meeting date no later than April 30, 1973 was considered imperative.
/
All agreed that it was extremely important to get a fix on an estimate of impact on the estuary and to get the utility thinking.about cooling system alternatives at a date sufficiently early to permit modification to the plant during the on-going construction period.
]
t()
Wil iam J.
Dircks Staff Member i
e I
i e
e 9.
e I
.~.__..
e
.,-9