ML19308D923

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Amend 15 to CP & OL Applications.Responds to AEC Questions in
ML19308D923
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River 
Issue date: 11/12/1971
From:
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML19308D921 List:
References
NUDOCS 8003200672
Download: ML19308D923 (22)


Text

,.

2, m ~.

sessesed wAtr t2w h -

J BEFORE THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO.15 TO APPLICATION BY FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION FOR A SECTION 104b CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND LICENSE FOR A UTILIZATION FACILITY DOCKET No. 50-302

?

s Florida Power Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, applicant for an operating license and construction permit for Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant,.hereby amends its Application by the filing of Amendment No.

15.

Amendment No. 15 consists of the answers to questions requesteo by the United States Atomic Energy Comission as transmitted to the applicant by letter of Dr. Peter A. Morris, Director, Division of Reactor Licensing, dated November 2,1971.

This amendment to the application contains no restricted data or other defense information.

8003200[ M

Amendment No. 15 Page 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the applicant has caused its name to be hereunto signcd by J. T. Rodgers, Asst. Vice President and Nuclear Project Manager, and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed by Betty M.

Clayton, Asst. Secretary, thereunto duly authorized this 9th day of November, 1971.

FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION BY J. T. Rodge rs V Asst. Vice President and Nuclear Project Manager AM EST:

/

Y.

li. 1 i

Betty M. Clayton Asst. Secretary (CORPORATE SEAL)

Sworn to and subscribed before me this 9th day of November,1971.

i lv bsdl2 i

' Sarah F. Crockett,

Notary Public My Commission Expires:

Notary Public State of Florida at Large My Consnission Expires August 24, 1975 (NOTARIAL SEAL)

s

~

FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT LICENSE APPLICATION Docket No. 50-302 i

ANSWERS TO UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

- QUESTIONS ATTACHED TO DR. PETER A. MORRIS' LETTER OF NOVEMBER 2,1971 Submitted as Amendment No.15 November 12,-1971 L

l.

i L

-}

e This statement is submitted :o the U.. S. Atomic Energy Commission by Florida Power Corporation, the Applicant in the above proceeding, as required by Section E to Appendix-D cf Part 50, Title 10-of the Code of Federal Regula-tiens, of the Rules and Regulations of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission as published September 9, 1971 in Vol. 36 of the Federal Register at Page 18071, and in specific response to the Peter A. Morris letter dated November 2, 1971 requesting additional information as to'the reasons why' construction should not be suspended pending completion of the NEPA environmental review for the Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Plant.

The following discussion addresses attention to additional information con-cerning the environmental effects that might result from elevated water temperatures in the discharge channel of the proposed cooling water system for Crystal River Unit 3.

Florida Power Corporation believes that this informa-tion will de=onstrate continuing flexibility-to install additions to the cooling water system after the completion of construction.

The environmental impact of construction of the once-through system for cooling, consisting of drawing water from the open Gulf of Mexico through the existing intake canal and dischcrging water back into the Gulf through the existing discharge canal with a maximum temperature rise of about 17'F, is minimal.

In response to the Commission's comment that, "It is our present understanding -

that excavation of the intake and outfall canal extensions and construction of the intake and discharge structures for the once-through cooling system has not yet started", the following is illustrative of the present status of this activity:

l.

There has been no excavation of the outfall canal extension and no con-struction of the outfall structure for the enc, through system. Approxi-mately 35% of the subsurface blasting necessary, prior to excavation of the discharge canal extension, has been completed at this time No blasting has been done in the discharge structure area.

Subsurface soil consolidation (grouting) has been completed in the discharge struc-ture area.

2.

There has been a minor excavation of the intake canal which was completed on June 24, 1971 for the purpose of receiving the sea-going barge carry-ing the Crystal River Unit 3 reactor vessel.

The dimensions of the excavation are 70 x 200 feet in area and 16 feet deep totaling approximately 8,300 yards, and the location is shown on Exhibit 1 attached herewith. Permitting, coordination and compliance was carried out with County and State Governmental Agencies and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to and during this activity.

3.

The balance of the intake canal extension has not been excavated at this time. There has been a minor excavation in the intake structure area of approximately 800 square feet by about 20 feet deep, totaling approxi-mately 600 cubic yards of material. Approximately 20% and 15% of the subsurface blasting for the intake canal extension and the intake struc-ture have been cenpleted respectively.

Su'asurface soil consolidation (grouting) has been completed in the intake structure area.

4 4.

It. is important to clarify that the areas of' the. intake and discharge canal extensions and intake and discharge structures are not in their natural state, nor have they been for several years. This is to say that these areas are directly a part of the immediate construction area and are devoid of trees and other natural vegetation. The soil charac-teristic of tihe area is essentially all native li=erock which is c yellowish brown rocky material characteristic of much of Florida. The Florida Geological Survey defines native limerock as a soft, porous, massive, detrital limestone composc.i of fossil shells, grains and nodules of calcite in a pasty matrix.

Limestone is a sedimentary rock composed essentially of mineral calcite (CACO ) sometimes in com'oina-3 tion with varying amounts of the mineral dolomite (Ca(Mg, Fe)(CO ) ]

3 and centaining ninor impurities, the more common of which are iron oxides, clay, ailica, alumina and vegetable matter.

The construction area was filled from its original tidal overflow marsh to its present elavation of 12' by deposition of material removed from the original intake canal excavation.

The specific information below addresses itself to the questions raised in the Peter A. Morris letter of November 2,1971:

1.

-Question Describe the type of material. that will be removed in excavating the I

intake and cutfall canal extensions. How much material will be displaced?-

W Describe your plans for ' disposal of this material and its impact upon the surrounding' environment.

Answer The material to be removed in the excavation of the intake and outfall canal extensions is approximately 70% undistrubed native limerock and 30% previously placed fill, which is a mixture of native limerock recovered when original canals were excavated and earthen fill purchased from off site. -The approximate amounts of materials remaining to be removed are as follows:

A.

Intake cenal extensica - 125,000 cubic yards B.

Intake structure area - 30,000 cubic yards C.

Outfall canal extension - 50,000 cubic yards D.

Outfall structure area - 15,000 cubic yards E.

Total -

220,000 cubic yards The excavated material is to be stockpiled on previously filled land to the southeast of Unit 3.

It is possible that this material could be used in the future in connection with Crystal River Unit 4.

The location of the stockpile area for the excavated material is shown in

~~

Exhibit 2 attached herewith.

l The environmental impact of stockpiling the excavated material is con-cluded to be minimal since the area of 'de,rosition is on existing filled land which remains a portion of the construction area.

Similar to the areas of excavation, tne stockpile area is devoid of vegetation and con-sists of licarock at the earthen surface. There will be essentially n6 run-off of liquid material from the stockpiled material, and thus there will be no degradation of adjacent vegetated areas from this activity.

From an aesthetic viewpoint, there is only the impact of raising the height of the landscape up to a maximum of 10 feet on a local basis.

However, this addition is with the same type of material and will pose no contrast to the adjacent construction fill area.

The area ne ociated with a maximum 10 foot high fill is approximately 14 acres, a very minor fraction of the total construction area.

e 2.

Question Demonstrate that excavaticn of the intaxe and outfall canal extensions and construction of the intake and discharge structures do,es not fore-close any of the four cooling alternatives identified in your statement, i.e., dilution of the discharge water, open spray cooling, cooling ponds, and, cooling towers.

Answer Discussion of cooling uater alternatives on pages 31-33 of the "Show Cause Letter" for Crystal River Unit 3 gives attention to the cunmula 4 ;

. w

tive heated water discharges from Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3.

The following discussion of these cooling water alternatives is based on the three unit cone,ept, since environmental effects of thermal discharges from the three units down a common pathway to the Gulf of Mexico are

~

generally applicable to one or all units. The Company considers that the three unit concept alternatives analysis for cooling water systems is the most appropriate means of evaluating and deciding upon the environ-mental cost-benefit of the Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3 cooling water discharge.

A.

Dilution of the Discharge Water Dilution of the cooling water discharge with ambient temperature water, to effect a lower ultimate temperature rise in the cooling water discharge is a proven and acceptable cooling water alternative sub-ject to its specific application on a plant and site basis. With a maximum temperature rise of 15'F at a flow of 1,262,000 gpm for Units 1, 2 and 3, then approximately 1,262,000 additional flow of ambient temperature water would be required to effect a 7.5'F maxi--

mum rise and similarly 2,524,000 additional gpm to effect a 5*F maximum rise.

Dilution would entail excavation of a large canal west of Units 1,

- 2 and 3 in order to bring water from the intake canal to the dis-

. charge canal through pumps. Please see Exhibit 3.

Bo,th the intake and discharge canals would have to be widened significantly.

j ;

?Nl Yv

. _j

h With the enormous quantities of dilution water required and the necessity of much additional canal excavation, the Company believes that dilution as a separate cooling alternative in the case of Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3 should not be considered because its cost to

.2 environment gives good indication of being too-great with little benefit.

In choosing not to consider dilution only, the Company wishes to present other alternatives,the first of which is a combination spray module - dilution concept for cooling water discharge from Unitsl, 2 and 3.

This system would be designed to limit the cooling water 1

discharge temperature to approximately 92*F based on an ambient intake temperature of 87*F (i.e., a 5*F maximum temperature rise).

This vovld be accomplished by utilizing 172 spray modules that 4

would limit the effluent temprature to 96*F with dilution to effect the 5*F rise to 92*F.

As can be clearly seen in Exhibft 3, both the spray modules and the dilution system are completely divorced f rom Units 1, 2 and 3 and utilize the present intake and

~ discharge canals. Thus the completion of the intake and discharge canal extensions and structures for Unit 3 in no way forecloses the adoption of this alternative as a means of supplemental cool-ing.

i The plan would necessitate widening the existing discharge canal from 100' to 160' and also would require excavating a new canal located just east of the bulkhead line (see Exhibit 3),15' deep i

and 150' wide extending from the intake canal to the discharge -

canal for dilutica purposes. The incorporation of the spray mod-ules in the discharge canal would prevent-all sport fishing activi-ty in the discharge canal which will preve to be of important

-local concern to the people.

The present worth value for this alternative considering first cost, operation. and maintenance for a 30 year expected life is approximately $23,000,000.

B.

Open Sprav Cooling This alternative concept is identical to that discussed abovc, only without, dilution. The length of the existing discharge canal of approximately 1.7 miles fron Unit 3 discharge structure to the bulkhead line will preclude use of spray modules alone to effect a maximum 5*F temperature rise for all three units.

This is yet another incentive to combine the spray module and dilution concepts above.

The spray module system is. discussed in terms of effecting a maximum temperature rise of 11*F.

This alternativa utilizes 132 spray modules to be located in the existing discharge canal as shown in Exhibit 4.

No alter-ations to the existing intake or discharge canals are necessary.

The cystem is entirely separate from Units 1, 2 and 3 and utilizes the effluent from them into the discharge canal as an input. Thus this alternative in no way is forclosed by the intake.and discharge canal extensions and structures, construction completion.

n m

~

The present worth value for this alternative considering first cost,-

operation and maintenance for a-30 year expected life is approximately

$10,500,000.

C.

Cooling Ponds This alternative cooling concept is.a closed loop system which would entail a saltwater artificial cooling pond upland of the bulkhead line and in the near vicinity of Units 1, 2 and 3. - Makeup would be frem the Gulf of Mexico.

Such a cooling water system would require a pond surface area necessary. to effect radiative and evaporative heat losses to the atmosphere in order to recycle water from the pond at ambient temperature back into Units 1, 2 and 3 condensers.

The exact pond area is somewhat uncertain at the moment, but preliminary studies indicate an approximate minimum pond area of 1,800 acres or about 3 square miles.

x The system would utilize the intake and discharge structures of Units 1, 2 and 3 as well as the existing condensers. Althcugh this concept is only in a preliminary state of investigation', it is likely that the existing intake canal would be used for makeup purposes as well as for influence of the recycled pond water.

In any case, the intake canal extension for Unit 3 :ad the intake structure will be a requirement.

The discharge canal extension for Unit 3 remains a requirement for this system, although it is likely that access to the Gulf from Units 1, 2

?

and 3 via the discharge canal will be terminated to effect discharge into the cooling pond.. -Thus it can be clearly seen that completion

~

of the intake and discharge canal extensions and structures for Unit 3 in no way forecloses adoption of this altern -drJe' cooling system.

There is no cost available for this alternative at.this time.

D.

Cooling Towers This alternative cooling water concept is based on a maximum tem-perature rise from Units 1, 2 and 3 of ll*F.

This system utilizes mechanical draft cooling towers utilizing 26 cells. As shown in Exhibit 5, these tcwers will be located adjacent to the existing discharge canal and co=pletely separate from Units 1, 2 and 3.

No alterations to the existing intake or discharge canal will be necessary for this alcernative. Thus it is concluded that comple-tion of construction of the intake and discharge canals and struc-

.tures for Unit 3 in no way forecloses adoption of this cooling system or a variation involving more or less cells to effect a different effluent temperature.

The present worth value for this system including first cost, operaticn cnd maintenance ' for a 30 year expected life is approxi-mately S19,000,000.

t l

- -lo-

3.

Question-Provide information that shows that excavation of the -intake and outfall extensions and construction of the intake structures and discharge struc-tures will not affect the technical feasibility or economic practicality of later adoption of each of the four alternative cooling methods listed in Item 2.

Answer The technical feasibility of dilution systems and cooling ponds as cooling water systems for steam electric generating plants is a proven entity.

Further, the technical feasibility of their adoption as supple-mental systems for Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3, after completion of Unit 3 canal extension and structure construction is an accepted con-struction procedure.

)

Saltwater cooling towers and spray modules operating in a marine environ-ment certainly represent concepts to be explored technically and environ-mentally more fully.

Florida Power Corporation recognizes the importance of assuring that such alternatives are in fact technically feasible. The Company has retained the professional services of Black and Veatch Con-sulting Engineers of Kansas City, Missouri to provide the engineering feasibility study of these concepts for possible incorporation as additive cooling systems for Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3.

The Bla.ck and Veatch

' Preliminary Reporti on: these systems'gives 'excellentiassurance that both 4

the' ~ cooling tower and the spray modules are in fact, feasible and reliable

~

1within the cost frame discussed in Question 2 above.. The Final Black'and

.Veatch Report will be furnished to the Commission in the very near future, when available. : The Company is confident of the professional capability

{

of -Biack cnd Vectch as demonstrated by.many years of experience.with the j

. firm, and is confident, after internal review of the Black and Veatch

. Preliminary Report,. that.. these sys tems are truly feasible for. Crystal

)

River Units 1, 2 and 3.

1 The economir, practicality of the spray module - dilution, spray module, or cooling tower alternative cooling water systems as presented above is not affected by completion of the Unit 3 intake and discharge canal extensions or the latake and discharge structures.

Thus the figures stated previously represent accurate assessment of alternative costs. Although no figures exist at the moment, the -

cooling pond. alternative concept is very likely to be the most t

expensive initially and environmentally. The Company-does not wish to recommend forelosure of any of'the discussed alternatives.

on an economic basis at this time.

Florida Power Corporation feels strongly that the. Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Environmental Report for Crystal River Unit 3 to be submitted' on or before January 3, 1972 is the ultimate mechanism for all to weigh.the engineering,.

l economic and ecological concerns for each of the alternatives in.

determining the public interest in these matters.

6' m,

.**w.

~

4.

Question Descrice the impact of an approximate delay of eight months in commencing excavation of the intake canal extension or the outfall canal extension, or both, upon the availability of the plant for commercial service and upon project costs.

Answer 4

Scheduled excavation commencement for the intake and discharge canal extensions respectively are February,1972 and June,1972. An eight.

month delay in the excavation commencement to October, 1972 and Feb-4 ruary,1973 respectively for the intake' and discharge canal extensions would not jeopardize, in either case, the availability of Unit 3 for commercial service in September,1973. There would be no accompanying cost penalty for such a delay.

Despite what the Company believes to be demonstrated assurance in this communication that completion of the intake.and discharge canal ex-tensions and construction of the intake and outfall structures will not foreclose the adoption of the discussed cooling water alternatives, the Company vishes to voluntarily delay the extension of the intake and discharge e.anals for Unit 3 for a period of eight conths as dis-cussed previously.

Florida Power Corporation hopes that this will offer additional assurance to the Commission of its sincere commitment

n n.

9 i

to minimizin'g the environcent' l impact of Crystal River ' Unit 3 in the

~

a public interesr.

The Company feels that, while refinement of the included information on this matter is still being made for inclusion in the Environmental 7

Report to be submitted on or before. January 3,1972, the ~ facts as presented here, represent -acceptable assurance that the continued construction of Crystal River U it 3 will not foreclose any of the n

cooling water alternatives.

Further the Company concludes that the four alternative systems, technically and economically, are feasible and practicable. An eight month delay in the intake and discharge canal extencions represents no penalty to project cost or schedule.

Florida Pos er Corporacicn is committed to evaluate the existing cooling water systca and the four alternatives discussed hetela in the Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Environmental Report.

It is from this total considecation of economics, engineering and ecology in the public interest that the decision on the final cooling water system design for Crystal River Unit 3 must be made.

t 4

..c, 4

3 l

l

. a f

I h

PRoPosco r': n

  • t1:

et.iT,

i k

l

...- -, n u ms meu 9

[

v x

_.4

-j-,-,_y.

.<-g.-3 x-s

+_

- _. r.

, - - s

- /

'J

'g g

g i

e.. -

' [ * * ". 0 M. ?. c' r'.*u :e... n.L) s T1 E.x GT C nc 9.uv2 c i.m t'.

r I'1 I m, i,, -

7,,. __,

. r.4 I

1

_ 1 h,; _ _. _ _'

t.

4r'

,1 D

l l

I r L s t.

t u ;r.

,,s:r a

- utetT ; j v*n

.: e t cov sr..

I c I l

i i

a t

E 1

i

\\1 \\

o C'~~ m t, -. -

'/

\\ r/

l

\\'d':

a-?-

P I

s g

g; l

l p

I

!2: 'l L->i 0

~l i

.. ri p4cce sc o viny 3 j

l;. (m i

i v) o sa a :.s vg

'I i

,t

- _ _ ~-,.. _e u c s i

i

';~.___'_,

iMTMW CloJ R 1

T' I

'/

l W

/

f',i j

' s~ q n n,f I

f

. ~ g' nmse ~r2 m

4 _., V,

'.4.,Jg

!?ti"A W

. N;.L e.e t.

j t

t

.i

\\

-I

%c

  • cv Va sul ! s<e. ;; Stig,i.u.. N A 1,1**.

, Ics g (2".

  • X 53')

s gp m

. ;. c, e., ~. s.;..y. e.w c..e

/; e c7 La.2 *...> c e. a c s ( u,3 c o cu. y;,5) e,

?

ISSUED FOR L! CENSING k

e(

i s

g Ciis.

5 AP2 I

I'

__ - ~.c ____

(

l t

..s.

A

.a e

g j

~

3.

I

~.j- ~

I g

.me.Ro LECT t

4P

- - - ~ -

v.

a i-l

-u-mews.w.m- -w s-see

_.. wmannou -= t i

REVISION l D Y._[ c r._..

A P P.

I

~ l-1

]

i'* ClM OA,r r es.V 3:! C Oi!PC R ATI C.'!

N si.r40. ;

O A T E

,9. _. J

, _i

<- i

, u r. o. r e.a s m D A T E _6_to _"'. S C A L Eip s

  • d- # B y u_* 5_ _C K /# E..A PP.'.'_

4

..[, 3j DRAWING NO. ESH I(5 t T kJ O. I T

'~~

i 8s 2

4

'i o

(i J5

-u t

t-e

-7 iL

.g:

i t,

/

( g.

O f.

t.

q.:

,.2:

. L

.i i w.

4 e2 L. :,

I. m v ;.:

g t.

U.J 4

g,<

t.7 s w e,

1 p >5 *

.?

)

o ed. : q TJ o$ -

1" t

- : a._...

e <

s e

x $,;

j4 e

al d

" A*PWo

-4 o..

r ;-

l-g 33 a-g- (

gl l

3 0

i s

2 g

O.-

.fas E.

,a~

E

,T

'o o

MV a

, ~s.,-e o

o,

- l l

v w

?,

"' i a.

w'

a l-ll E' u <t t , -

~

-.i I

'.m.

e i

n o

i 8

'i g

i i

L- -

,f

.a 9

,3, e.. g\\,.;*,...

p i,; t.

.%s.-

..I 2

\\

i ; ----

,,* 'w s

,e l

t

\\

.,,y

t2 3'

ll:

i (i

r~- -

~~~\\

\\

~~

1,..g ?.

,/

[

s.o,.c n a N,

2 e,

a

.e w

f:g 23

.s'

<t I

  • ) +',a%

{

\\

l s!

\\. A j

i ed o g

g g

\\

s i

l' e

\\ >l f. ',

.,il !

e

.c f."-....

e --. -. -.- f,,

E,

\\

\\$ g\\ ',

  • 4 $

2 e

I p

1\\

5 i

t.

e a

..i s

a i

\\' '\\

g j'

2 e

b b

\\

\\

9

.c.. o s.

,',f=. - _. -. -... -. dl j 1

t--- --,' j ja

~.,h, J ',

L i

W y

<--- --*+

(i k (

,' s 'a.

f 7g L

>e

i g l

E ",

e

,3 l'

~

53

,?.

a >J ;4 y

s,

=

4 a:

)

e

.a; (3

, j,],j '

j C;

g m,,,,,,,,,

5,e,,Jf-*

b

's h6 1

!I l r

i

.i aba i i

N~~..

l J

q o

~ 'i,

%_.-.-.-.?.

U g, ] !,

5 iIf_W i

i

- i.

)

  • , 4 r%

4A 0

t l M

,8

,/

(4 f I

im itv4 a&aos pset*e 00 0 Noia va

/

al1=:

'f;-

1 A

o J<l $ w !

qn 3 ;;- d

n..,.,-;

g z

l

[

4 w,

2 d

,f g

g o

o E,

O e

J' C

,Tl k

3 4

s E 3g;

-o os>

i) 4 i

a *f II

/-

uI i

-l

=

22 s

e.e z

(

l 5

i

/

ai

/

{

-W t

o

.s e

)

pt of pt p

~

4

.L.

j

. - -..m

_r y

'I.. -

..}..

fl f

w..

L:.;. '. e e.

.e-

- li ;

F..s.

.t.

o.,

6

't

-l.

k-

' a i

i

. e '

l'j *g* f.\\.

'"g

=

4

. t r.

j;n Q,,

t-

.gj ?.

t i.

t L.

I,

I 4, l'

. :( i

^ f,.

4 6

/

h.

l p

/

3 i

s,.

,I...-.

_. ~...

'l

'];

l:

g.

4 0,

n s

i 3 + 4,

=,,,

4

.M !. -

g c

g I

n

-,d.... 3

.i o

i e; y

.a T.

,f.

x. [

,I.<..'

} -,.,. -, 5 y'

8 *.D

.{

  • 4%.

e

  • . e

,.q.),._u

-S t

t 4,..

4

s. o

. T.... y, s.'. vy,.

a.

p r.

p-

,1 s ite

.t.,,;;.

s O

g :ar., g g; w

s.

....... q. g.,

y-lQ g -

n.,

.,V s

. r,. - '0 v

}.

.9 g.c. t g 3 Pg r'.

? f:--

ss i

(

3 4

ii gil j

5 M -a v.

ica *. w s 3 d

>* O

-77.J _... _._ _

__t. p, s......_..:._.. ;, ! ;

I'

-?-

Z 7. v..g....-...... _ - ~ ~n'

....W--

a s g

00 0 v4 wy

..h...

eu.s.3.ep.ps c-

.. w,u.,

J-t I

m8; n i,

n....

.t.

- :1 t

.t c

i J

gag od 8

or soa t

k f

f-t M I

. c sa l

sm ge..~-.:

l y.

( A..../...

a=

E y

y l-l T.

't y..-

1%

s g,,,. s /I h h '.c:!

t.; 0 ik'4) d<l e

.I jo p=

s e

y., O t 4 '.'.;j t

i n *, e i.f.il%

t-c ' Y '\\

?

7; C Ed a-L-

l U.~

,j o

16 2;.

Z ;'.7

,1-P C.'

....y

,j-e-

6 i ?

e t.

c. *

.g

s..:
  • 5c

- D l

sg

t. ' =

hl l /l(

..,'.J

  • (
  • C U '

1 *;

.. '.,... \\

    • .4 el---

5 45.

.l

' 9 t; '

gI=

' f,,9. - l h, 5 415

$H

%..*/ -

-* 1 l

~c(

,.... =.,

,, t so,

  • e l

t t

]? ~

b * "4,g..

.. A g

a 5.,;l3 J 6

s 4i

(.j.:nr:: ;j 1

~

~ M..

Q8i

~]

.i 3

<x

,~ j

'l.,

.,6;s,'

.... \\

u,.s.

,~.

Q p>%,

x.-

L~~.

. l

.l., n Q.;e 1/

..'g r...

)

~**T=

} -

I' :.3 s.n E

.9 a

-.m Wo.,, \\

n m, n l L

y s

i'-

f s :,'.l* 'f Ol' {i 1.'. G p.

.) 1 ' 'i ye *.

  • 6. =- 1 5,

- I

  • w c50,

(

v

.d s

-\\ %e ss

.,=

"o

.s., '.n.. v'.. s.

e G

msw.

g,j, 6

i -

-..t n *(

f.,

b, om. ) f *', #$

d w.

  • .--5 e

t.

.e w

,'.4 8.'

lPi Vl

{

P.+

I['>: ::,

p

w e.;

.i e.

u

.l,e.,, !

f'. 1.3,v,-

3 i

l o

i 1

e

'..)

.o

,o

o. \\

c.,

a

< r 4

n'

L y

' \\,',,

w-s

.t s

g

/'

0

' p' ' 9

,h v-

.- ]

f v

.c

/

O( [.-

  • 1 e**~~~**

fde i,

,,.l

,/

s-r 6

'.'s..' ',';..

l,j'/

ti '*. d Q,

,,,9

, V',

l 3

" ~.

t,-

.I 2

'i

.p

  • / /.

UJ s

.s-

-.,]

(,q

[-

t..,

L \\,.,

d 4

tc, f f i

a*

1 i}

~

s f.-_

i

\\

o.

.i t

g i

o e.

i a

e

  • . i-e, ~ -,j, p.

B; e s.

L --f-a,-

7 s..

l s.

L v

m v

-.e a.

u, 1

1 y);,

6.

O'.

g i

l

~,;

j

,g I

r

.k d

t

.j

.l

.. - ~:.

i_

.m.

)

l l*

f O '*'

],. *

\\

I, e*

-* *a. e e-e e

'8

{

,,l s

e' p

.g r - %...- l.-

/

a i

+

t

., o.

.e

e.
  • 1 6

s.

u r

\\

.NJ,{'.s' s

i l

p'

.'sdt p

?.

. \\ **i g*'

es r

a

.a s s

a s

i e

El0 se y

/

e J.

g

. Y, W

- :; 4. -

g, a

~

Gr N dV h. SL

V 8 %)

..s 7,

x x

a n

b'..

r(

U.-

,z til g

l s

4..

U)> -

n-l

  • sl 4 Il-a O

o'

)

ei

..k EL ll I

i-

?,

.. m -- -

q M

'O,

.v>

n.

\\.

r4 r.o

.e 3.

k

$.N.

[

[ 3... I '.M g

8J e.

-g.--,,

l.., lo.U x

a u

f 5.

5 ene g

-g

[,. -- !. C..;- --tr

  • .1 i,

o s

j i.

e

. -w-,

\\p-Q;me'1,.s,.;-(,U.qs v

e t

.e.,,..,,.... u -.

a.

v c

, w.. -.

1 li-

s. -..u,,i e, e

,,I P E '2 n,

.%..,.. v.v 2 * '

,l [ ;-r.-

4

-f

.c ol

.v e i f,

.P. > *: rt

~TMllX2'~~;fl@fWlI

~ =k.&ar55r%e ;*

mi5 g

e T

i t

wa

,I o l[w -M. -.m;,fl.

w l

7 ao

,i P..S. JA.s -

88

~

~

i o

l

. L rr. -s. m. ),..

t

s. a u

".< i;6 l

J -

I

>g: a*z:

1,(--q -

g. W,. ~,.. y' p,. ;

N;.;..t,. a., y.,

a mu c<

c- =

y,e-a i

r.

e-

. : - t:.,,.,.

l.,

i,-

=

,,.,3 s.f; p yf?

h k

_V,

!.h'II'

\\ y.H k.%

I A..:

I,g

> -. --- 9, q

n.

s,.

s

. i. -.i gQ a.f, j j **

V.' Q$

w g-m i n,

.J,e #-.

,2 -

A.:\\

a o

y..

D_ m.

,4 x;, ) y m i. s _--...-_._

4 n-n

  1. 3 oa
s...

f x

g}

p

.y 3

a u.,a a

a, c4 mo i

yo f

~o 1

al

.<n n

a

/'..,. -

ls1

\\.;m c
.h, 5i.

u 1 i__

l Mcr:?

i 1

m i

.. j f.e.

q s..m.\\,

o o

[.,.,.y i:,.

u r.

e 4,

7. g u, g '-

.4e 4'-~~4.'

!f, 5

s i<,{i,j 7"0\\,n@, r;;"

1 g.v. w.

.?

8

\\.-

g p.d"!l;1

?,

r M:

.3 t

/

S

/

I

.ej y,3

&.a o

(

s 6..',,..

o c.;;y,\\. p;;g i,

.4 c

g pn s. c. =,

. 2. p : /

...u....<

.P.

~.ss.2

"; \\'\\. u g

.o L f. <

se

',/ -

8

( k'.,(t }h,- --s\\,.'

8 o'

i.~

r,S j

% 6: '

a h a.\\$s.\\.

^

, M.I].,o ? :l.

l

. i.

  • g. \\..\\

a.

e T

g. - 6 f b.e, O) -

f

.f,k, '.I'.k { \\,

\\,

U, i <

T N

co7 i

e

.i ea tv.y.

. v. _

. p'9

' j *..

Nb,.

t, s. --

o g

.p..

[

p, O g' 4,',Y } {N', E) \\\\

'g v

. [, ;

e'

}11'

'\\...,\\ (

/

o k, g,.

i s,

a

\\ l \\.k, O o te k

-w s

sr g-%,

. /

ei l

C.* $ f

', f ;,\\ Y. \\

~*

'y;*h.g

',yc.q\\g\\' \\:q 1

3 j-'

ij [e.,

' ~.s j

u y

o p.

f- -..

z l.; a4

.n

.: r e,

u. y c,

.~-~ n.

y

,5 ',,, H*

'.m af oe(

.c,:

-r s

u

\\.*

o.

- d I: ~,

c

.. \\.a..

.r

>r.

g n:

..g

.e.

b-.

,j.

46

.....---f.--....r-...#

t.

,e

{

1, o

\\

i

', -- a

-;:.=.: -

.,t..

7 3 s.

'4 3

h.- '

3*

,..(

\\..

.I. i I*,

].p....

l. ' l.

.#n,

  • . rW

~

w. ',,\\

, n

- u.

.i t

i

~ '.

~*

\\tv

,,, e n.. {-

t. ; \\;.,.s.\\\\

,,,8

,. s

.

  • 7. ~.,. 3 i

. m,

,,N'

\\,\\..

\\.-

s t s.,

w-, ' n.;

d 8

r

,3..

4 i

s

. i M, *. i,' k,'.O.

t 3.;.

a.. sp ',,#

,e

..-~.g

,i z,

. v \\,.\\

- i '*

c..

h, ll, v

.s ~ \\ *,

,a n

s i

t, '

y g/

y

,s, Exhibit 4

4 I

L

,s.

b 3

t il n)

,e,>

a p.x il W h,I -

i,.

N.

G.,

o..

c,,i... ',

o. -

',,1:

=,

14.

da ~

e o 4:

. -r, 3i,1 -

y,

/

a o

t

.i

.i 4

.-**.-=-.e.

n ;:1 -

c e.- <

,. l '*.

4-c.---=,N 5 [a g

i

~

E(!

%==s cn o A,.;

L_ ;;,-,g '..10 *
;

to t'-

<i-- -

. ',s -,ur._

3 cc --

.e

. g.(

'3 O ;d

'c ph y

L,._..,5 p.? m f

k,U h.. l ',U1!3.!A. W p o a..5. y.,

.m.

. - c,

. c.,,,

i, e..

ea.o,a 5r_---,;;;-- ~ ;,53e g.

"r'J.P.,.v.

l

, g,,,,

.,,y.3 gq I!

6:

PC 1JJG 4 ::ss sv3 '

t a ';. '_y '_....

o l

rr e -

,, t q -

J k.

! /. 1 7,C.. V. il!,

o /--

l.. a I

y

. '. s,s ( /m T,

Ox r'

l; w,A.

,l U.,::

ft

>2 A

i a

op. o,

),. g,j N,-

Q r,4,3.

_q j.,

l z,,I !.IN,.... o._'. ill

&.)

g,.

,.3 g

],

O ta

. 25 i t t:

,1 n

o

i. m o. a as

) ( :.. -.,i.:-: N. Y v..4 v,u > e).," I q y,g, i

s.

,! e.: <

z F C' n

o p

r' z

<1.

,,;.r.;;.i A

h' _b

. f. I h h,-',{

a y,N L J (n_

r.*.,.

.:, e

-\\cf,i..

y

n.. : n,. l o

==

,..1

_o, o r

e i

...q f. J 5

.d

,,. i e r

,4 i..;n c i P

9. n

/

.,,.N r:" g 1

ipw. y i\\g, %.

t tr

,G.==..'

.)

H.;A' '1 g

I N.. ;@.

/- -- :-

4

m.. it. c.

a.,

I,i 3

7......

..- ~

{

,--i ts I.b '.I S

/

e,i c.f i his

".f J.lr' C.

g o

,. r

411.)\\.s

,. h

'*'plre-q

/

y

$1_. '3

,. V '

o l;.b y

p4

?

2 u II,.i L

  • Lst.
  • i uf\\n'y e

a a b.,,

s3 y..d 1

n.

L < -..-. J y

o

.,\\\\ }ny",;.,;

s, l1 i

~~.

J,,.,

u

.t g

p

. e s \\'$.q[

11 7-f f fi.

./

f g

in g !'f

/ m'.... 3,d f - - c,,,

=>

e

,/

S

,G. ? ' \\

tj V

l' * ~- a i

', [r,.,

e.

3..

i-a:

a t *., -

l

(* 4 be 6 Y. '\\ \\ f,

}

u,,

g a ;-

a. o. '

p'

(

t's n

'J e. <4 l,-

/

e S'

+,+, I*t 1,k L. f, i

' l 5-

,,0.'*a..,

4. 4.s _

O, t.

j p

s f" g

. - * * =. g e

[ }gI.'*i

'[

i

.s I l[j

\\

/ * *1 y

y

$h **)

f~

{t

\\

oA', '; \\

/

m)

/

(w.pI h y'g hj(y g

r...,

y' [

."-----s,,

o j;' E

.y /

N.

.,, 4;}.i\\

y

'.'. i y i

i w;.~

t, a

e n - w

.:.t t.. _, _.:

e i n S. it-

,,}

  • .1

. V

\\?

n a.p s

~.

s I t i l - 1 ~- ' -- :

_j_.__----+---..,[.. ' 'h\\.,.,,***;

f,,

y i

, s.,

g j

i r ;,, i,,

y g

v.

h. * * * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

t,'. It \\k...

N, s

.,.,# q';\\.P.i. l l. i.ly

... q -

~'

g gg, g m s....,. *-..,.,., -..

qa a

I

'1,v. j '1

%,/

r, y b. iI

/.

s i, g ) iy.

I-h.

l

'.1-f t.,'[' i I !

/ f.

g p

i. - O

,h,

'p f,/ $

fM

)/

i-Is e

o O

l 1,/.

o 4

s-e u

s o

w-T.

\\ /-

t.

i

.U.

J...

g v

.s

-ome o

O 8

d