ML19308D800

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Renews 720901 Request That AEC Deny City of Gainesville Conditional Request for Hearing & Petition to Intervene
ML19308D800
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/16/1972
From: Evertz H
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To: Oleary J
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
DR-5095, NUDOCS 8003180739
Download: ML19308D800 (2)


Text

a. t i,.rta Sn95 l FILE LOCATION FROM CONTROL NUMQER Flories P-w Corporation D ATE OF DOCUMENI A CTIO N COMPLETION CE ADLINE St. Petersburg, Fla.

11/16/72 g j g _: 12/6/72 10 AcilON FROCE55tNG D ATE 5 PREPARE FOR SlGN ATURE OF:

Ac knowle dg e d Chairm an Inteam Report Director of Regvlotion F enol cEsCPietiO" 1.tr O 1"o.aoi 0 Co.,

O O's.r m m-m Ref Itr in Caerge Spiegel 11/13/72 re Crystal River #3, and rences request of 9/1/72 that the Commission make a determin-stisia that the City of Gainesville's Canditiemal Request for Emering and Petities to latervene be danied REFERRED TO D A TE IS NOf tFIC AflON TO THE JCAE RECOMMENDED 7 Shepar Cys: O' Leary Braitaan hehatJtie(50-302 FDR Local F9E DO NOT DETACH THIS COPY DIRECTOR OF REGUL ATION Form HO.32 (6 70) !

COMMUN CAllONS CONTROL U$A EC u

)

D

~

8003180739

/27

~%

~'.W;:o,

. y, o

_g

- l$o C

- - {e

+: ; :. s' 7.%nda Fc o.c..m......

p November 16, 1972,$Ah$gx

'.7 )

//.Npq;--l'y,-[.,G Mr. John F. O' Leary, Director f

, e.t...

Directorate of Licensing g

United States Atomic Energy Commission

/

' -u Washington, D. C.

20545 NOV20 072 ~ 3

...,..< k.

Re: Crystal River No. 3 Nuclear Gener.iting t,

, \\..'

Unit. Docket Nos. 50-302 and 50-302A d'e.'Y N

6

Dear Mr. O' Leary:

N.

Reference is made to Mr. George Spiegel's letter of November 13, 1972 addressed to you. A copy of Mr. S.

A. Brandi-more's response to Mr. Spiegel regarding it is enclosed.

We do not agree with any of Mr. Spiegel's assumptions or statements. Especially do we deny any attempts to change any of the basic conditions contained in our letter of December 6,1971 to the De-partment of Justice. Our entire concern has been with the language of several explanatory notes clarifying two of the commitments.

It is our only desire that the future application of the conditions (which we have already accepted) and their interpretation, be fair and reason-able to all persons. However, we cannot agree to any interpretation which results in preferential treatment of one group of consumers at 1

the expense of another group and which result is not required under any fair application of the antitrust laws.

We respectfully renew our request of September 1,1972 that the Commission administrative 1y make a determination that the City of Gainesville's Conditional Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene be denied.

Very truly yours, b

H. A. Evertz, III g

Assistant Counsel

\\,

HAE:gc Encl.

cc: Messrs. George Spiegel Wallace E. Brand eOgy Bernhard G. Bechhoefer N 7f 3q

,D 3R. 5095 V.e=.@. gA Gn n neni n w a uni n e..

%..,. n n n,,,, m, c. n......,,,

e.,.,.. n m. n n _ n,.n.c i r.,

l