ML19308C803

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notifies of Us Court of Appeals 760721 Ruling in Aeschliman Vs NRC Re Return of ACRS Rept to ACRS for Clarification. Requests Notification of Actions to Be Taken in Response to Court Order & Estimate of Time Needed for Clarification
ML19308C803
Person / Time
Site: Crane, Midland  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/14/1976
From: Head D
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To: Moeller D
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
Shared Package
ML19308C802 List:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8002070536
Download: ML19308C803 (1)


Text

..

m-

,p.;

,u..:

...n-1

(

=

~

,.., q '.

n. Q]..,
  • r *

.(

e

.\\

  • 1*

e t

e.

h l.

t

f UNITED STATES v

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

.e..

WASHINGTON, D.

C.

20555 y7 d

Fi i;y g October 14, 1976 1(.

. ~5 02 15 h4 9 !2 o

h' Dr. Dade W. Moeller

[$:7 Chairman, Advisory Cannittee l'.!.

on Reactor Safeguards

' T.~,,, 7#'US.id.w

%d-ei,G 1016 - H Street

${

Washington, D.C.

20555 f:

.L 2 RE: CONS 11ERS POER CQFAIN (MLfluWD FIRTf, UNITS i & 2), DOCEr c ' c'*.

NOS. 50-329/330

~

4 c., ;.

'7'I.'

Dear Dr. Moeller:

W a

hO The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit f.9 in Aeschliman v. NRC, Appeal Nos. 73-1776 and 73-1867 (July 21, N'.

1975), ruled that your camittee s report on t e Midland fac l ty h

ii

, ~,'

should be returned to the ACRS for clarification, in particular

.u.'

~

for further elaboration on the reference to "other problems".

y

,; u.

This Atanic Safety and Licensing Boar'd has been reconvened

'f. " -

by the Cocmission to conduct the reopened proceedings required by

.V.

the above-identified Court decision. This reopened hearing includes the issue of clarification of the ACRS report.. As required by the Court, we are hereby returning the ACRS report of June 18, H

c1.

1970,with its supplanent of September 23,.1970,to you for clarifi-

.k :'-

catien. Would you advise us of what action your Ccumittee is taldng or plans to take with regard to Midland in respon~se'to the

'q Court order. We muld also appreciate an estimate of the time 7^ ;.i that will be required for de clarification called for by the Court.

G h;,y$,.'.

S

~K prompt reply muld be helpful to the Board in assessing p, 5p, scheduling requircnents for the reopened proceedinc,.

(f.,.?,

Very truly yours,

.v g

{!

l Daniel M. Head,- Chaiman

+

3.R d S.'$

Atcaic Safety and Licensing Board t

,y

..), r.

~.

D '!f.

~rnelosur'e:,ACRS report

/

u 9.[e. ',.il

/

cc w/o enc 1: I!arold L. Reis, Esquire p?

Myron M. Cherry,. Esquire. /

80.02070 [

.; p

'h 3

Jane A. Axelrad,' Esquiro

~

4;.i

% jd,.

,p uT 4 James N. O'Connor, Esquire x

t

.?

,e

.f Rk ]

,'. I ""

f

,