ML19308C342
| ML19308C342 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 07/13/1979 |
| From: | Frampton G NRC - NRC THREE MILE ISLAND TASK FORCE |
| To: | NRC - NRC THREE MILE ISLAND TASK FORCE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19308C340 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8001220781 | |
| Download: ML19308C342 (2) | |
Text
O [v =' arc <,
V LL*.'!TED STATES y 3.,[ %,
NUCLE AR REGUL ATORY CO.*.".'i!SSION g
w,'.. g j
V. ASHif 410... D. C. 2C555
'* q, ~; A,ff July 13, 1979 MEMOR**;DUM FOR: Task Group Leaders FROM:
George T. Frampton, Jr.
SUBJECT:
OUTLIf4E OF REPORT:
fiEED FOR ADDITI0f!AL If4 FORMATION FOR NEXT DRAFT The following lists of specific items we might be looking at in our Report need to be provided for the next draft of the Report Outline.
At our meetings with the vacious Task Groups next week, we will make sure which group should provide Aich lists. Our goal is to get this material collected by the end of next week, together with other comments on the Report Outline, so that a next draft can then be prepared.
1.3 List of major responding NRC components.
1.4 List of state and other federal agencies responding (with a short description of each agency's responsibilities and how they responded).
1.6 Major decision points during the few days after the accident.
1.8.5 Alternative sequences we are going to be examir.ing.
1.9 We may need a chronology of press statements.
/ 2.1 List of possible design deficiencies in the plant systems.
2.2 List of possible control deficiencies.
2.3 List of possible instrumentation deficiencies.
s p
2.8 Are there any suggestions for additional specific questions we might ask under this category?
i 3.5 List of precursor events we are investigating.
3.6 List of prior operational problems at TMI-2.
3.7 List of prior recommendations not adopted.
We should have a list that is not limited to recommendations but includes all l
prior studies, e.g., WASH-1400; Rickover study; Task Force on
~
j control room design; etc.
l' 7
fm / aknf/
u
Task Group Leaders July 13,1979 4.1 List of equipment that failed and contributed to the accident.
4.2 List of procedures that might have helped.
7 4.3 List of newer requirerrents not applied to TMI-2 (grandfathering).
4.4 List of any specific exemptions granted to TMI-2 that might have played a role in the accident.
4.6 Issues raised in the licensing that might have had a role in the accident.
5.1 List of physical plant status deficiencies.
5.2 List of deficiencies in the health physics program.
5.3 List of major operator errors.
6.2 List of instrumentation that could have helped.
6.3 List of crucial points at which operators did not get or did not believe information.
8.6 Various aspects of the utility's response to be studied.
11.
Are there any additional suggestions for possible " overview" issues?
12.
Please begin a list in your heads of the major recommendations you think the Report should contain, in order of priority.
George T. Frampton, Jr., Deputy Director
!iRC/TMI Special Inquiry Group A