ML19308B653
| ML19308B653 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 09/20/1979 |
| From: | Jay Collins NRC - TMI-2 OPERATIONS/SUPPORT TASK FORCE |
| To: | Arnold R METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001160536 | |
| Download: ML19308B653 (7) | |
Text
....
N r
.R l
Septeraber 20, 1979 i'
.,ccse t..u.
ad-;.:u uetropolitan Edi:.cn M.any nasa: ar. h.
v.. nrro n e A nior tice Prus1 dent d.
- v. :.ux 4Js
..i odl e w.in, Punn*,j l vani a 17:.67 watic,.an:
m aiuT:.icetia; on.bsvic.1 and,wrcial of TP.1 deceurf :,,:eratin j Procecures ns a follow-u;: to ey ccrres,xnance ci +.ur.:s e 23,19/9 cot.cernin3 tr.e ruvia>. of Tol is;coveri vpurating f racc.:ar:.s. a.eatin :..a3 neld ca Sep;ccer 0, liTi, a ca; adC PrcCeuura evieu
','.af f, P:..c. e-. vers sne
..wC i.umrs..i copy of a;s,ca 1 s, clow ui1.h C.>.. ents/ ;%itics is attaC;.tc fJr,70Ur istfor atiOO.
1 Miticipate t.lat !!eC:.:35dff aC;iUtt to resolve Outstalidin] cuncerns will ec taAda ia a cArcui t1GJf, u.Bmwr.
Pludse h0*0 C.id " MIL cne r ;..ce tir.t; la
".u ud scadJul0d tu Clariff OJr iCsitlGD da ad-.inis; raw /2 Cus;rvli, f P
,irGcwdure Cndr. gds.
Furtadr, it 15 JDt1Cl.Mtud 0.:at th15 dea t.*edu n,
saculu either res.alve odr cancerns ur duvelop a.). activa list (alcn...i 1
- ia
- . acle) f ar aa%uata r.ssolatiun.
. / staff is r.:;.orea tu discuss arey 3pecific qv.sticas ycu cr joor staff g
wy riave. Taaa4 you for your attention to tais att.ar.
S ir.ccralj,
i J. T. Collins, deputy Lirector l
InI <. bus;mrt Lnclusures. As stated i
i i
i I..E...............P........f..........NRR OFPics >
f A
a CoEMttr
...C.o..n t e :.w.,d s SuRNAMEb
~
'"J.. 3.........
. -... -. ~.. ~..
...........Q. f.I
/
c ate m NRC FORM ;;1816 77)
W U. S. GOVE RNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1977-237-0258001160 5%
f
A f
.ietropolitan Edison Ccapany 2
~
September 20, 1979 l
cc w/en.ci:
E. L. iallace, Licensing Manager j
- v. J. !$arton, Project Anager J. d. iieroein, Vice President - Generation i
L. L. Lawyer, wnager - ueneration vperations P..iiller, r.anager - Generating Station - huclear 2
l J. B. Logan, ' nit 2 Superinteneent J
i G. A. Kunder, Luit 2 Superintendent - Tecnnical Support l
I. fl. Finfrock, Jr.
j
.t. Conrad j
F. Trowbridge, Esquire u.
i J. Licher...an, Equir;:
l diss Mary V. Scutc. ara, ccairman, Citi: ens for a Safe 2nfiron ent 1
I
(
bcc w/ encl:
l IE Mail & Files (For Appropriate distribution)
Central Files Public Document Room (PDR)
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
{
Technical Information Center (TIC)
REG:I Reading Room j
Comonwealth of Pennsylvania l
t R. H. Vollmer, Director, TiiI-2 Support i
THI-2 Reading File i
5 4
I I
i f
f l
1 oF FicE >
SURNAMED........
OATED NRC FORM 318 (6-771 9 U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1977-237-025
A Cnclosure' PROCEDURES MEETING September 6, 1979 ATTENDEES NRC REPRESENTATIVES L. Bell R. Conte D. Haverkamp D. Neely S. Newberry W. Raymond LICENSEE REPRESENTATIVES D. Bates l
R. Benzel M. Bensen M. Bazilla J. Brummer J. Colitz L. Garman D. Jenkins G. Kunder J. Lawton W. Marshall J. Paules F. Rodies, Jr.
R. Warren AGENDA 1.
Procedure Concerns a.
Adequacy of PORC/RORC reviews - Previous procedure content shortcomings (highlight C, F, G attached)
(1) Ref: ANSI 18.7 - 1976 (2)
Should vs shall use in procedures l
COMMENTS / RESOLUTION: No specific resolution was made, however, a i
significant amount of time was spent discussing each of the items attached upon which all parties had the opportunity to express their viewpoints, b.
Use of handwritten copies of procedures - Administrative Controls should address distinguishing pre and post approval changes for SOP's and other procedures handwritten.
l i
l
c.
' Administrative Controls to clarify use of TCN's for 50P's C0f44ENTS/ RESOLUTION: It was agreed that another meeting would be scheduled to further discuss specific concerns in these areas (b and c) d.
Z's, EP's, R's exceeding 90 day effectiveness (1) Schedule for incorporation into formal procedure system
]
(2)
Implement Schedule e.
Operator Training on Revised AP's for Recovery TS f.
Tracking System for Inaccessible Valves and its use for procedural I
implementation COMMENTS / RESOLUTION:
Licensee staff acknowledged action is needed in the above areas (d,e,f) 2.
NRC/ Licensee Interface Items a.
NRC needs copy of issued procedures typed, numbered, etc.
C0l44ENTS/ RESOLUTION: NRC will supply list and manpower for copying procedures previously issued and provide a list of procedures for subsequent procedure distribution.
b.
In interim:
for TCN's - if content cannot be clearly understood, a copy of the entire procedure should accompany TCN.
c.
Procedures not receiving a detailed review will be Receipt Acknowledged with initial in NRC approval block.
COMMENTS / RESOLUTION: Paragraphs b and c were information.
d.
Ref.: TS A/B 6.8.1 and 6.8.2 (Copies distributed at Meeting)
COMMENTS / RESOLUTION: For information only, questions or comments were solicited and discussed.
3.
Licensee Questions /NRC Responses Are " receipt acknowledged" procedures to be resubmitted to the NRC (i.e., formulate a list of NRC approved procedures)?
RESPONSE: As required by TS A/B 6.8.2 any procedure (required to be reviewed by NRC) and changes thereto are subject to approval by the NRC. The " receipt acknowledge" concept is an internal administrative.
aide and does not alleviate the licensee from submitting such procedures or changes. The use of lists of NRC approved procedures is discouraged.
It is preferred that each new procedure be reviewed against TS A/B 6.8.1
' Criteria for NRC approval, and that-each procedure which is NRC approved (acknowledged) reflect that information on the cover sheet as in the past.
w s
e-
1 4
4.
Previous NRC Procedural Approval vs~ Post Recovery TS NRC Procedural _ Appro_ val Category
-Previous Period Post Recovery TS Period Chemistry (1800 NO Per TS A/B 6.8.1 1900)
(AnalysisProcedures)
Security (1005)
NO Per TS A/B 6.8.1 Fuel Handling NA-So Far Yes Operating (2100)
Yes Per TS A/B 6.8.1 Emerg/ABN (2200)
Yes Per TS A/B 6.8.1 S0P's (Z, EP, R)
Yes Per TS A/B 6.8.1 Surveillance (3300)
(2300)
Yes Per TS A/B 6.8.1 (Selective Detailed Review)
Admins (1000)
No Under NRC Review Maintenance (1400-Station)
(E,M,IC,U) BM's (2400-U2)
'No Under NRC Review HP (1600)
(1700),
Yes All COMMENTS / RESOLUTIONS: The question of NRC Review and approval of Administrative and Maintenance Procedure is under review by the NRC procedure review staff.
O
_--___=____----p j
Attochepent to E losure 1
SUMMARY
OF PROCEDURE PREPARATION SHORT COMINGS (This is not comprehensive list of all elements of a good procedure.
It summarizes areas where procedures have not been adequate based on NRC comments.)
A.
PROCEDURE CROSS REFERENCING Either within the Procedure References Section or within individual procedural steps for the system, give interfacing operating procedures for:
Other systems whose operations are a prerequisite to the a.
operation of this system; b.
Other systems whose operation depends on this system; Emergency procedures applicable to this system.
c.
B.
CORRECT NOMENCLATURE 1.
Precise nomenclature or abbreviation provided in engineering drawings, system descriptions and manufacturers instruction manuals should be used to promote consistent effective connunications.
Slang terminology (ex. EPICORE II) shoul d be avoided within a procedure.
C.
DIRECTED ACTIONS /0BSERVATIONS 1.
The elements of a directed action / observation in a procedural section'should be:
The goal to be achieved.
The manipulations required to achieve the ' goal (for actions only).
The observations to be accomplished which verify achievement of the goal.
DATA
- D.
' Procedures submitted for review and approval should contain all data defining normal operation including allowed deviations as well as alarm set points.
Where baseline data must be determined during preoperational testing, it should be noted.
E.
DEPARTURE FROM NORMAL OPERATION For problems which cause the system operation to not meet or not indicate the limits of its normal operating parameters, the entire syst ;n or affected portion must be secured, unless special provisions have been procedurally established.
These special provisions must detail the temporary corrective measures and evaluations which may be taken in order to' maintain system operability.
f.
EVALUAllVE STAlCl1ENTS WhEn an evaluation of results is necessary to determine a subsequent course of action, the necessary observations and criteria for making the evaluation must be included in the procedure rather than phrases like "if necessary" or " call the cognizant supervisor".
G.
INCONSISTANCIES WITHIN PROCEDURE The startup portion of a procedure should be consistent with the appended valve line-up.
If a regulator isolation valve is checked closed in a valve lineup prior to starting, the startup section should address opening the regulator isolation valve.
The shutdown and infrequent operation section should restore the system to a prestart lineup.
p e
e e
%