Mods Agreed Upon by Applicant & Intervenors to Applicant'S Initial Interrogatories & Request for DocumentsML19308B265 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Oconee, McGuire, Mcguire |
---|
Issue date: |
10/18/1972 |
---|
From: |
DUKE POWER CO. |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML19308B264 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 7912180851 |
Download: ML19308B265 (8) |
|
|
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20067B2391982-12-0202 December 1982 Response to Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Related Correspondence ML19308B2331974-05-15015 May 1974 Responds to Fifth Set of Interrogataries.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19317F3371974-01-15015 January 1974 Applicant'S Supplemental Matls Re Util 740115 Interrogatory Motions ML19308A8121973-09-17017 September 1973 Applicant Supplemental Interrogatories & Document Production Request to Each Municipal Intervenor.Request Extends to All Documents within Possession of Intervenor.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19317F2461973-09-17017 September 1973 Applicant'S Answers to 730917 Interrogatories of Joint Discoverers.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19317E7601973-09-17017 September 1973 Applicant'S Supplementary Interrogatory & Document Production Request to Doj.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19312C4811973-09-14014 September 1973 Applicant'S Interrogatories & Document Production Request to Doj.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19308B2651972-10-18018 October 1972 Mods Agreed Upon by Applicant & Intervenors to Applicant'S Initial Interrogatories & Request for Documents ML19308B2621972-10-18018 October 1972 Applicant'S Initial Interrogatories & Request for Documents 1982-12-02
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20212D1771999-09-20020 September 1999 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50,App A,General Design Criterion 57 Re Isolation of Main Steam Branch Lines Penetrating Containment ML20211A1801999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards Comments on Draft Geig Re NUREG-1437 ML20205M8401999-04-15015 April 1999 Memorandum & Order.* Orders That Petitioner Appeal of Board Ruling Be Denied.Commission Affirms LBP-98-33 in Entirety. with Certificate of Svc.Served on 990415 ML20199K8231999-01-25025 January 1999 NRC Brief in Opposition to Appeal of Nb Williams,Wb Clay, Ws Lesan & Chattooga River Watershed Coalition.* Licensing Board Decision in LBP-98-33 Should Be Affirmed.With Certificate of Svc ML20199K8101999-01-25025 January 1999 Duke Energy Corp Brief in Opposition to Appeal of Chattooga River Watershed Coalition.* Informs That Licensing Board Decision in LBP-98-33 Should Be Affirmed.With Certificate of Svc ML20199D7021999-01-14014 January 1999 Notice of Appeal.* Chattooga River Watershed Coalition Files Notice of Appeal to Commission for Review of ASLB 981230 Memorandum & Order Denying Petitioner Petition for Leave to Intervene ML20199D7241999-01-14014 January 1999 Chattooga River Watershed Coalition Brief in Support of Appeal of Order Denying Intervention Petition & Dismissing Proceeding.* Commission Should Grant Petition for Review & Remand ASLB Memorandum & Order ML20198K9911998-12-29029 December 1998 Memorandum & Order (Denying Petition to Intervene).* Denies Petitioners Requests for Intervention Because Proffered Contentions Failed to Meet Requirements for Admissability. with Certificate of Svc.Served on 981230 ML20198D2601998-12-22022 December 1998 NRC Staff Response to Petitioners New Info.* Informs That Info Provided by Petitioners Not New & Does Not Support Proposed Contentions.Recommends Proposed Contentions Be Dismissed & Proceeding Terminated.With Certificate of Svc ML20198D2191998-12-21021 December 1998 Duke Energy Corp Response to New Info Submitted by Chattooga River Watershed Coalition in Support of Processed Contentions.* Petitioner Submittal of New Info Should Be Stricken for Procedural Reasons.With Certificate of Svc ML20197J9201998-12-14014 December 1998 Order (Requests by Staff & Applicant to File Responses). Motions of 981211 Re Applicant & Staff Request for Leave to Respond to Petitioner Filing of 981209 Granted.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981214 ML20197J9441998-12-11011 December 1998 NRC Staff Motion for Leave to Respond to Petitioner Filing.* Staff Requests Leave from Board to Respond to Info.Staff Will File Response within 3 Days After Board Order Issued,If Board Grants Request.With Certificate of Svc ML20197K1131998-12-11011 December 1998 Duke Energy Corp Motion for Leave to Respond to New Info Submitted by Chattooga River Watershed Coalition.* Requests Leave to Respond to Petitioners New Info Based on Listed Grounds.With Certificate of Svc ML20196J9051998-12-0909 December 1998 Response of Duke Energy Corp to Licensing Board Order Requesting Info Concerning high-level Radioactive Waste Transportation Rulemaking.* Util Requests That Board Certify Question Immediately.With Certificate of Svc ML20197J8691998-12-0909 December 1998 Petitioners Response to ASLB Request for Addl Info & New Info for ASLB to Consider with Petitioners First Suppl Filing.* Response Filed on Behalf of Ws Lesan,B Clay, B Williams & Chattooga River Watershed Coalition ML20196E0091998-12-0202 December 1998 NRC Staff Response to Order Requesting Information.* in Staff View,Impacts of Transportation of HLW Not Appropriate Issue for Litigation in This Proceeding ML20196E0191998-11-30030 November 1998 Affidavit.* Affidavit of Dp Cleary in Response to Licensing Board Questions Re Environ Impacts of Transportation of High Level Waste.With Certificate of Svc ML20195G5621998-11-19019 November 1998 Order (Requesting Addl Info from Staff).* Based on Directives in SRM M970612,staff Should Furnish Listed Info by 981202.Applicant & Petitioners Have Until 981209 to File Response.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981119 ML20195D5281998-11-16016 November 1998 Response of Duke Energy Corp to Supplemental Petition to Intervene Filed by Chattooga River Watershed Coalition & Nb Williams,Wb Clay & Ws Lesan.* Request for Hearing Should Be Denied for Reasons Stated.With Certificate of Svc ML20195C1601998-11-16016 November 1998 NRC Staff Response to Petitioner First Supplemental Filing.* Petitioners Failed to Submit Admissible Contention.Iaw 10CFR2.714,petition Should Be Denied & Petitioners Request for Stay Should Be Denied.With Certificate of Svc ML20155F5041998-10-30030 October 1998 Declaration of N Williams.* Declaration Expresses Concerns Re Duke Power Co Application for License Renewal for Oconee Nuclear Station,Units 1,2 & 3.Application Inadequate to Protect from Unacceptable Risk of Radiological Accidents ML20155F4951998-10-30030 October 1998 Declaration of Ws Lesan.* Declaration Expresses Concern Re Duke Power Co Application for Renewal of License for Oconee Nuclear Station,Units 1,2 & 3.Application Inadequate to Protect from Unacceptable Risk of Radiological Accidents ML20155F4791998-10-30030 October 1998 Petitioners First Supplemental Filing.* Petitioners Request That Chattooga River Watershed Coalition Be Admitted as Party to These Proceedings & That Contentions Be Admitted for Adjudication.Unsigned Declaration for Wb Clay Encl ML20154H0771998-10-0909 October 1998 NRC Staff Answer to Petition for Leave to Intervene Filed by N Williams,W Clay,Ws Lesan & Chattooga River Watershed Coalition.Petition Should Be Denied for Listed Reasons. with Certificate of Svc ML20154A9371998-10-0101 October 1998 Order (Ruling on Request for Extension of Time).* Motion for 30-day Extension to File Amended Petition to Intervene Denied.Petitioners Have Addl 11 Days Until 981030 to File Suppl to Petition.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981002 ML20154A0401998-09-30030 September 1998 Response of Duke Energy Corp to Request for Enlargement of Time of Chattooga River Watershed Coalition & Messrs, N Williams,W Clay & Ws Lesan.* Petitioner Request Should Be Denied for Listed Reasons.With Certificate of Svc ML20153H4191998-09-29029 September 1998 NRC Staff Response to Motion for Enlargement of Time Filed by N Williams,W Clay,W Lesan & Chattooga River Watershed Coalition.* Petitioners Failed to Establish Sufficient Cause for Delaying Submission of Amends.With Certificate of Svc ML20153F3131998-09-25025 September 1998 Notice of Appearance.* Informs That ML Zobler,Rm Weisman & Je Moore Will Enter Appearances in Proceeding Re Duke Energy Corp.With Certificate of Svc ML20153H0801998-09-22022 September 1998 Comment on Draft NUREG-1633, Assessment of Use of Potassium (Ki) as Protective Action During Severe Reactor Accidents. Emergency Plan Calls for Evacuation of Population of EPZ in Timely Fashion to Prevent Exposure to Radiation from Oconee ML20151Z7051998-09-18018 September 1998 Memorandum & Order.* Applicant & Staff Shall File Respective Answers After Petitioners File Any Amend to Intervention Petition.Answers Shall Be Filed IAW Schedule as Submitted. with Certificate of Svc.Served on 980918 ML20151Z5681998-09-18018 September 1998 Notice of Reconstitution of Board.* Provides Notification of Reconstitution by Appointing P Cotter as Board Chairman in Place of T Moore in Duke Energy Corp Proceeding.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 980918 ML20151X9911998-09-16016 September 1998 Establishment of Atomic Safety & Licensing Board.* Board Being Established in Proceeding Re Application by DPC to Renew Operating Licenses for Units 1,2 & 3,per 10CFR54.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 980917 ML20210K7351997-08-18018 August 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-licensed Activities (Effective Immediately).Rj Nelson Prohibited for 1 Yr from Date of Order from Engaging in or Exercising Control Over Individuals Engaged in NRC-licensed Activities TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20077E8231994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule ML20044G7371993-05-25025 May 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Opposes Rule ML20101R5931992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Opposes Rule ML20070E6291991-02-28028 February 1991 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-73-9 Re Regulations to Upgrade Design Basis Threat for Radiological Sabotage of Nuclear Reactors ML20147F3231988-03-0303 March 1988 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $100,000 within 30 Days of Order Date ML20215D6741987-06-12012 June 1987 Suppl 4 to Petition for Immediate Action to Relieve Undue Risk Posed by Nuclear Power Plants Designed by B&W.Ucs Reply to Responses from NRC & B&W Owners Group.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20214F4411987-04-24024 April 1987 Endorsements 35 & 36 to Maelu Policy MF-101 & Endorsements 43 & 44 Nelia Policy NF-248 ML20210C4191987-04-0606 April 1987 Principal Response of B&W Owners Group to Petition Filed Under 10CFR2.206 by Ucs.* Petition Should Be Denied ML20205F2911987-03-23023 March 1987 Suppl 3 to Petition for Immediate Action to Relieve Undue Risk Posed by Nuclear Power Plants Designed by B&W.* Requests That Listed Names Be Added to List in Paragraph 1 of 870210 Petition ML20210C2691987-03-0606 March 1987 Initial Response of B&W Owners Group to Petition Filed Under 10CFR2.206 by Ucs.* Request for Immediate Suspension Should Be Summarily Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20211F5091987-02-20020 February 1987 Suppl 2 to Petition for Immediate Action to Relieve Undue Risk Posed by Nuclear Power Plants Designed by B&W.* Lists Names to Be Added to 870210 Petition & Corrects Address for Save Our State from Radwaste ML20210N4861987-02-10010 February 1987 Petition for Immediate Action to Relieve Undue Risk Posed by Nuclear Power Plants Designed by B&W Co.* OLs & CPs for Facilities Should Be Suspended Until Listed NRC Actions Taken ML20203N3261986-09-19019 September 1986 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 DD-85-19, Order Extending Time Until 860303 for Commission to Review Director'S Decision DD-85-19.Served on 8602201986-02-19019 February 1986 Order Extending Time Until 860303 for Commission to Review Director'S Decision DD-85-19.Served on 860220 ML20137L5911985-09-10010 September 1985 Response Opposing Jf Doherty 850611 Petition for Show Cause Order Requesting NRC to Institute Consolidated Proceeding Per 10CFR2.202.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133P9591985-07-26026 July 1985 Unexecuted Amend 8 to Indemnity Agreement B-83,modifying Definition of Radioactive Matl as Listed 1999-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ . _ _- - - -
UNITED STATES OF M1 ERICA ATOMIC E::ERGY COPJ:ISSION In the Matter of Duke-Power Company ) Docket Nos. 50-269A, 50-270A
) 50-287A, 50-369A (Oconce Units 1, 2 and 3- ) and 50-370A McGuire Units 1 and 2) )
MODIFICATIONS AGREED UPON BY APPLICANT AND INTERVENORS TO APPLICANT'S INITIAL INTERROGATORIES AliD REQUEST FOR DOCUMENTS - -
- 6. (a) State whether in the period 1960 to date, the municipality or the system, or any. employee o'r agent of the ,
municipality or the system, has proposed to or discussed with any customer or potential customer the possibility of proposing any electric rate schedule, tariff, rate contract or agreement, conditions and terms of service or any other statement of rates other than those furnished in response to Interrogatory 4.
(b) (Unchanged.]
~
- 8. State the effective date and describe the substance of cach change made in any rate schedule, tariff, contract, agree-ment or terms and conditions of . service at any time during the period January 1,-1960 to date. Furnish all documents indicating-the' actual _cr exp_ected effect on revenues of each such change in dollar'cr. percentage. terms. ,
~
7912180 [, k .
- .. . . - - .._ . ~ . - .. .--
- 11. (a) For each municipality, tcwnship or other incorporated or unincorpora:cd area served by the system, state .
1 for cach of the years 1961, 1966, 1971 the name and address of:
, (i) the five industrial and five ccamercial custcmers consuming the largest number of. kilowatt. hours of elec- ,
tricity supplied by the system; and (ii) any customer whose demand equalled or exceeded 200 kilowatts.
(b) For each customer named in response to In terrogatory' ll (a) state for each of the years 1961, 1966, 1971-i the following: -
(i) kilowatt-hour sales to the customer; (ii) revenues derived from the customer; I
(iii) the customer's peak demand and the l 4
l month in which that peak occurred; 1
)
(iv) the customer's peak demand in the month i
in which the system peak demand occurred; i
, (v) 'the monthly load factor for the custcmer; i 1
(vi) applicable rate schedules for service to 1
i the customer; (vii) the minimum monthly charge applicable ;
j to the customer; n
(viii) the voltage at which: servi ~ce was orovided to'.the cust$mer.
m.
4 4
- s -
- y. ,, ,,r . . , - - - . .
t i
4
- 12. State the length and voltage of each transmission i or dintributi~ca line and the ccst of'such line or lines and asccciated f acilitics installed specifically to extend service to each of the customers identified in response to Interrogatory 11.
s j 14. (a) State whether the system or the municipality l
l or any. agency or department of the municipality at any time from January 1, 1960 to date has had an industrial development depart-1 ment or an individual employee or group of amployees, a prescribed-or substantial dj facto part of whose duties is oT XaT been t 7 '
~ ~~ ~
]
attract commercial and/or industrial (facilities to locate in
, the municipality or within the area served by its.clectric 1/
facilities.]- If so: -
(i) provide the names and addresses of such present or former departmenb and-
.its present and former chief (s) and a
- all such individual employee (s); and
(
(ii) provide the dates from January 1, 1960 /
to the present during which such depart-7 ment existed and such departmental chief (s) 4 and/or individual employee (s) were employed.
(b) State whether the system or the municipality, l or any. department er agency of the municipality, at any time from-January 1, 1960 to date has retained, employed,:cr beenL
~
-1/- Agreement E has not ,been reached ast! o the- language within brache:s t
in the tent. --Interv'encrs would subs titute ,. for the : bracketed phrase,'the words "custcmersofor the-system". _
i l
1 !
'i
.i
' advised en-a consulting basis by any person or crganization to advisc on, investigate-or in any way conduct. activities f
or other efforts designed to attract commercial and/or.
industrial'[ facilities to locate in the municipality or within 2/
the area served bv its electric facilities.]-
If so, provide i
the name and address of each person or organization employed, retained, or rendering advice as a consultant for this purpose during.the period January 1, 1960 to date, together with the 4
name of the entity by whom and the"dateTdGFilig wliicrsuch
~
- person or organization was employ 1d, retained, or rendered advice as a consultant. ,
(c) [ Unchanged.] -
(d) - [Unch anged . ]
- 16. Furnish copies of all documents relating to any
. approach to'or discussion or contact with each commercial and/or industrial customer er potential commercial and/or industrial,
, customer with uhem anv.such di.scussion, approach or other contact.
was made during the period January 1, 1960 to date, utilizing, i
~
in whole or in_part, information or material-. described in l
1
. Interrogatory 14 or 15. l
- 29. (a) State the cost andJestimated value of,. and
' describe intdetail, each service donated to or-provided to the-2/ Acreement has not' boon ra n ch ai es to the11anguage withinL brac::e s l
in1the text. .Intervencrs would substitute,1for;the bracka-a#
phrase,-the words "cus:cmers for'the systen".
1 o
1 I
~1 1
. 55. (b) (Unchanged.i ,
- 59. (a) Furnish all documents' prepared, sent or received by the' system or the municipality from January 1, 1960 to date, which contain any reference to expected construction or development of production capability for the system, or to expected future increases in investment in the system, or to -
growth in the system's peak demand, sales, revenues, profits and/or number of customers.
(b) (Unchanged.]
- 60. (a) Furnish all documents prepared, sent or received by the system or the municipality from January 1, 1960 to date, which are addressed primarily to the economic condition of the area served by the system, or which contain, describe, evaluate or comment upon projections of future econcmic conditions in such area, or'the prospect for attracting commercial an'/or d c
industrial.'ustomers to locate in the area served by the system, or other potential stimuli of econcmic growth in such area.
(b) (Unchanged _. ] -
- 71. :(a) (Unchanged.] _
(b) (Unchanged.]
(c) State the-name and address of each commercial or industrial customer outside the municipality's 'ccrporate limics-served with electricity by-the municipali:y'at any' time duringithe' period January 1, 1960 1 to date, who_also-has applied 6
'el
J v
to thc' municipality fcr one er.more coning variances at any time during that period. Describe each variance sought, the date(s) involved, and the action taken by the municipality on the application.
- 73. State, if possible, or if not, estimate, the number of residential, commercial and ind'ustrial cds?.cmers (by customer class) which are located outside the municipality's corporate limits which at any time-during the period January 1, 1960 to date, were served with water or sewer service (scecif.v ____
which) by the municipality and whose electric service was supplied by a utility other than the municipality.
- 75. [ Deleted.]
- 77. Except for the information and/or data already 1
1 supplied in response to Interrogatory 76. state the cost pbr kilowatt-hour, including both estimated capacity and energy costs, for the system's most recent bulk power supply programs, and those as of 1960, 1965 and,1970, for the following ten-year period, or such otner or shorter periods as may have been utilized by the system for planning purposes. Include a state-
' ment of the estimated (and where' applicable - the realized) cost of generation and transmission programs undertaken or proposed
- during the production period indicating:
(a) For generation.and 1
(b) For' transmission subdivided by. voltage classes, the estimated cccts as follows:
4 k -
e
~
d
-S-(i) investment cost in dollars per kilcw te; (ii) energy' cost in mills per ki'cuatt-hours; investment carrying charges and energy
~
(iii) cost in mills per kilowatt-hour.
- 78. (a) Furnish copies of each document prepared by or for the system or the municipality relating to technical and/or economic feasibility of the system constructing generating and/cr
. ~
4/
transmission facilities alone or in concert with other systems.
(b) [ Unchanged.]
- 79. (a) [On line 3 change "feasility" to " feasibility". ]
(b) (Unchanged.]
- 80. State whether, during the period January 1, 1960 to date, the system or the municipality, or any agency or depart-ment of the municipality, ever has sought, requested, considered (insofar as such consideration is refle'cted in any written documen t) , or inquired into the initiation of wholesale electricity
/
supp'" to it by any. electric utility, other.than Duke Power Company. If so, describe.in detail each such instance and-furnish each document relating:to each such instance.
4/' The parties have' agreed upon the revise'd. language set forth'
' in tho text.' Honover,, agreement has not been reached as to the applicability of this . language L to EPIC, Inc. .Intervencrs-will argue that this language.does not call for documents with regard to EPIC,Ror,,if-it cces',-such t doccmants should not be required to be1 produced in response ' therato, i
e m
5
.