ML19296D684

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Confirmatory Order Directing Licensee to Install Recirculation Pump Trip or Place Facility in Cold Shutdown
ML19296D684
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/21/1980
From: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
Shared Package
ML19296D683 List:
References
NUDOCS 8003120798
Download: ML19296D684 (4)


Text

-

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of

)

)

0NSUMERS POWER COMPANY

)

Docket No. 50-155

)

(Big Rock Point)

)

)

CONFIRMATORY OFDER I.

Consumers Power Conpany (the licensee) is the holder of Facility Operating License No. DPR-6 which authorizes the Licensee to operate Big Rock Point at power levels not in excess of 240 megawatts thermal (rated power).

The facility is a boiling water reactor located at the Licensee's site in Charlevoix County, Michigan.

II.

Over the past eleven years the subject of anticipated transients without scram (f TWS) events and the manner in which they should be considered in the design of nuclear power plants has been discussed extensively between the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) Staff and the nuclear industry.

In April 1978, the Staff published a report on, " Anticipated Transients Without Scram f or Light-Water Reactors", NUREG-0460, Volumes 1 and 2, which sumrarized technical considerations related to ATWS and made recomendations.

80031207 W

. Following additional investigations by the Staff and by the ACRS, the Staff issued Volume 3 of NUREG-0460, in December 1978.

Although final determination of all the design changes to nuclear power plants which may be necessary to respond to ATWS events has not yet been reached, the Staff has concluded that the addition of a Recirculation Pump Trip (RPT) in boiling water reactors (BWRs) would significantly limit the immediate consequences of an ATWS event.

Therefore, letters dated January 9,1979 were sent to the BWR licensees who did not have installed RPTs.

These letters:

- described the reasons for requiring an RPT at this time,

- described two alternative ways to provide an acceptable RPT, and

- requested that licensees provide an RPT implementation schedule which would provice for installation within two years.

III.

Because an RPT provides considerable additional assurance that a BWR can safely respond to an ATWS event, I have determined that installation of an RPT by BWR licensees should be completed as soon as practicable and in no event later than December 31, 1980.

In response to the letter of January 9,1979, and additional discussions with the Staff, the licensee committed, by letter dated February 5,1980, to installation of an RPT before reactor opera ;on during calendar year 1981.

I have determined that this commitment should be formalized by Order requiring that RPT installation be completed no later than December 31, 1980.

. IV.

Accordingly, pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR Parts 2 ana 50, IT IS HEREBY ORDE?ED THAT:

The licensee shall, by December 31, 1980, install a recirculation pump trip, or in the alternative, place and maintain its facility in a cold shutdown or refueling mode of operation.

V.

Any person who has an interest affected by this Oraer may request a hearing within twenty (20) days of the date of the Order.

Any request for a hearing will not stay the effectiveness of this Order.

Any request for a hearing shall be addressed to the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission, Washington, D. C.

20555.

If a hearing is requested by a person whose interst may be affected by this Order, the Comaission will issue an Order designating the time and place of any such hearing.

In light of the Licensee's expressed willingness to install an RPT, if a hearing is held concerning this Order the issue to be co1sidered at the hearing shall be:

whether RPT installation should be implemented as prescribed in this Order.

e e

4 Operation of the facility on terms consistent with this Order is not stayed by the pendency of any proceedings on the Order.

R THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Eisenhut, Ac ing Director Division of Operating Reactors Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Effective date: FEBRUARY 2 1 1980 Bethesda, Maryland