ML19294B097

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Response to Applicant & NRC Briefs Re R Alexander 800206 Appeal.Restates Interests as Affected Family & Urges Aslab to Grant Intervention
ML19294B097
Person / Time
Site: Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date: 02/10/1980
From: Ryan Alexander
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
References
NUDOCS 8002270121
Download: ML19294B097 (3)


Text

7 a\

Y j go9

$ -5 -

k , February 10, 1930 g\UA , 6 FAT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIO:.

BEFORE THE ATO.VIC SAFETY A.iD LICENSING APPEAL' BOARD In the matter of )

)

HOUSTON LIGHTING A?;D POWER COXPANY ) Docktet No. 50 466

)

( Allens Creek Nuclear Generating )

Station, Unit 1) )

)

ROBERT ALEX ANDER ' S (PETITIO?iER )

BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO APPLICANT AND STAFF Unon receipt of both Staff's and Applicant's briefs in resconse to the Petitioner's appeal on February 6, 1930, 'he Petitioner was eranted seven days in which to file and serve his renly to those briefs,as per his telephone conversation with Ms. Bishop on that day.

CANDID STATEVENTS '

The petitioner regrets the paucity of information supplied by him heretofore and that reme of which can not be intelligently addressed by Staff and/or Applicant. He intends to present here an improved and more suitable discourse in support of his Case.

STATEMENT OF INTERESTS A+ stake in the above-captioned nroceeding lies an issue very dear t^ the Petitioner, i# not to all individuals in si ilar circums'9nces: that of *he well-being of himself and his family. Me is concerned 'ha+ his wife and children are healthy both physically and mentally. Me would like to see bis children grow to adulthood. This interest IS affec'ed 8002270-lt l .

~

p-

~

If Applicant is permitted to build ACNGS, 'Jr. Alexander and his "anily will live in their Hous+or residence under the constant shadow of uncertainty. They canno+ be assured that this facility is safe. Were the plant onerators trained nronerlv? Is the plant structurally sound? Will seismic activity initiate an irreversible reaction that leads to a core mel+down? These and a host of other unanswered ouestions shall haun+ the Alexander family as they reside in Houston.

This doubt and uncertainty will not be without a price.

The psychological toll exacted upon :dr. Alexander and his family cannot be stated in tangible terms. Will his produc-tivity decline? Will he and his family be able to cope with the added burden of this nuclear menace? Nill his children grow un neurotic, knowing no safe environment, but only a day-by-day Drayerful existence?

The Anplicant must remove these doubts before any construc-tion Dermits are granted. And only the Petitioner's partici-nation in this proceedinc can insure tha* those doubts are thoroughly esnoused.

CONCLUSION The above discussion delineates the Petitioner's interest in the above-captioned proceeding. To safeguard the welfare of himself and of his family, the Petitioner implores the Anceal Board to grant him leave to intervene.

Respectfully submi+ted,

[ bw Robert Alexander

-3_

cc: Steuhen '4. Sohinki Greg Coueland Alan S. Rosenthal