ML19291F825
| ML19291F825 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 02/01/1982 |
| From: | William Kennedy, Wigginton D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Thompson H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19291F826 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8202240289 | |
| Download: ML19291F825 (2) | |
Text
,
W 4
Q Docket No. 50-395 FEB 0 t 1987 MEMORANDUM FOR: Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Acting Director Division of Human Factors Safety v1 4(#s
- ennis L. Ziemann, Chief THRU:
D
'MJ
,f Procedures and Test Review Branch
.p s
0,.., #
Division of Human Factors Safety R>
4 "Nrblayton, Acting Section Leader
_m _. AD g
s Section A - Procedures Procedures and Test Review Branch 7
- !l 31982b-Z Division of Human Factors Safety 4 u mu ma na j
3 same amm u FROM:
William G. Kennedy f,
Procedures and Test Review Branch fy Division of Human Factors Safety J
0 David L. Wigginton Operating Reactors Branch #1 Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
RE-EVALUATION OF THE VIRGIL C. SUMMER EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES On January 18 and 19,1982, we visited the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station and reviewed their current Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs).
The purpose of this trip was to evaluate whether the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) needed to be changed in view of comments made by Mr. M. S. Medeiros in his trip report of December 22, 1981.
Our review consisted of (1) evaluating each specific comment made by Mr. M. S. Medeiros in his trip report, (2) comparing the current E0Ps to the NSSS vendor's (Westinghouse) revised technical guidelines of July 15,1980, and (3) the resolution of the Westinghouse comments on their E0Ps.
The evaluation of the trip report's comments resulted in approximately six items that needed correction but did not render the E0Ps unacceptable.
These items were identified to I&E inspectors for resolution. The comments were discussed with the plant staff and they agreed to make the necessary changes. The comparison of the E0Ps with the technical guidelines yielded no comments. The review of the resolution of Westinghouse comments resulted in one item where the plant staff disagreed with the vendor. The plant staff agreed to resolve the difference with Westinghouse. We find this commitment acceptable.
I&E will address these and additional comments in the Resident Inspector's Inspection Report 50-395/82-06.
summ)
B202240289 820201 CF ADDCK 05000395 e
CF OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
/
+
, FEB 0 1 1982 llugh L. Thompson Based on this re-review, we conclude that although there are minor deficiencies in the E0Ps, the statements made in our Safety Evaluation Report remain valid. Specifically, we find the Emergency Operating It should be Procedures are acceptable for operaticu at full power.
noted that the long-term program (TMI Action Plan Item I.C.9) will result in revisions to their E0Ps based on NRC approved technical guidelines and a poneric writer's guide to be developed by the industry which include human factors considerations.
Original signed f( '
Original signed by William G. Kennedy David L. Wigginton Procedures and Test Review Branch Operating Reactors Branch #1 Division of Human Factors Safety Division of Licensing CC:
J. Skolds, IE W. Kane, NRR V. Brownlee, IE Reg. II K. Woodward, SCE & GC I
J. Youngblood, NRR DISTRIBUTION CDocket_50-395)
PTRB Reh' ding' JJKramer LPCrocker DLZiemann HBClayton 1
WGKennedy m~
DLWigginton 2
i b
DHFS:PTRB DHF ;TRB DL:f,
- 1 DHFS:PTRB4 or,,cr p
- -1)
WG,
>dy:ah DL
.nton HBClaytorf DLZiemann om> 1/ve/82 l Q...,./ 82
'll l /82 1/7.4A2
'"N~
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY r enu n no eomsc w ouo
.. _ _ _