ML19291A494

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 770928 Request for Info Re NRC Studies on Acceptable Risk from Waste Mgt.Discusses Several Projects
ML19291A494
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/19/1977
From: Meyers S
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Kennedy R
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML19291A480 List:
References
FOIA-79-109 NUDOCS 7905160324
Download: ML19291A494 (4)


Text

~

'T )

N h&l

[

On,

i,

?

5 N?

~

?

3,_

q W Y199 4

w

'E
0RALDU'1 FCR: Comissioner f:ennedy Gric.tnal SIFnod by i

THRU:

Clifford V. D. lith, Jr, Director C'

C0 f UU ' E -

Office of :iuclear Material Safety anu #'egua'r'ds a4f f

FR0:!:

Sheldon : layers, Director Division of Fuel Cycle and ;1aterial Safety-

SUBJECT:

ACCEPTABLE RISK CRITERIA t a L'.

T:iis acmrandu:n is in response to your request for iaformation concerning

....C stusies on acceptable risk (see enclosure 1).

L Tn Office of :uclcar,43terial Safety and Safeguards has contracted 4 f uith Lw.trcnce Livercare Laboratory (LLL) to select a mechanism for detencining what constitutes an acceptacle risk from waste canagement and to provide a set of acceptable risk guidelines for establishing waste canagement standards and evaluating waste nanagsent licensing actions.

pp T::a specific objcctives of the LLL contract are to:

h '.'.

1.

Develop a basis for deter,:ination of acceptable risk criteria for waste canagement.

2.

Evaluate altcrnative methods for development of acceptable

?'

risk criteria considering various levels and types of rish.

i; 9-:

.e.

3.

Provide a technical Insis for the findings.

UO 4.

Coordinate activitics with the riational Council on Radiation

" f ;'

Protection and !!casurements (::CRP).

s....,

.e

-j MJ The LLL study is a two r, art study with LLL conducting some work in f". i house and subcontracting other work. The level of effort for tiRC's y.i -

. contract with LLL ms $260,000 for FY 77; $135,000 has been spent g,i ';{

on LLL's in house effort, and $125,000 has been subcontracted.

y l,

7 90516 03N f

o...e a w T.

7 t

7

}

a-

t I

t r-,

f b

Cannissiont-Kennedy 2-l I

LLL l.as subcontracted pirts of the overall study to Systens control, t

i Inc. (501), Decision and Designs. Inc. (001), and the S2tional Council l

cn Radiation Protection and :Teasurements (UCRP). The purpose of the i

SCI subcontract was to:

1.

Revicu existing approaches to acceptable risk criteria i

development.

2.

Ident1Ty factors to be considered in acceptable risk criteria developnent.

3.

Identify alternative approaches.

4.

Assess apuroaches and s Jggest a preferred inathodology for I

acceptable risk criteria.

b' o

~

The SCI verk has been ccmpleted and a report has been submitted to LLL i

'for their review.

r.'s LLL has a subcontract with DOI to determine an optipal methodology for acceptable risk criteria development. This work has been completed e

f>~

and has been subnitted to LLL for their review.

Tae ob.iectives of the UCRP contract are to:

3 l.

Study inechanisms to determine what constitutes acceptable risk

[.'

to the public from various radioactive wastes, c.-?

~~

2.

P.econnend a cechanisia appropriate for acceptable risk from

[.+,.

reactor and fuel cyclo waste,s.

v

!4 '

3.

Provide acceptable risk guidelines for I'RC to consider as a basis for rulemaking and regulation of vaste management operations.

c

-Y. '*

[.p<;

A status report of this work will bo included in the LLL report due 4.M in lata november 1977. A final report from aCRP will be published as p;,~-

an GCRP document and will be incorporated in MRC's data base for developnent of acceptab'le risk criteria,

$", 7

~

c I

I h

ca rec e >

t.

....e_._

[.

NRC FOLM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240 1'r us s. eovsmaisswv emiavvise or ness tere. eaus4 i

. nw

.w a

~

Conr.is5ionerLennedy I'.

i,.J/7 -

s h

f LLL's principal in house t:sk is to coordinate the work of their necontractors and to :ugment the subcontractor's. ark witcre accessary witn technical data.

I A report of work on acccutable This report will cover the progress to date of both I

..urk as weil as the work of their subcontractors.

since tha develo;:nent of acceptable risk criteria involves both end product will be a procedura rather than a qua pian to develop acceptable risk criteria for liaste :

J' J

regulations and of risk assessm/or policy stats.ents.

W.11e there are a number nt studies helng funded by the Of fice of Nuclear

.tegulatory Research (RES), there are no current studies directly

[

siued at determining an acccptable risk.

[n 1977, tha Co.;aission suggested that the Probabilistic Analysis Mcwever, about June I

Cranch (PAS) of RES prepare a plan for developing an agency wid program to quantify acceptable risk.

Branch Program Plan. has allocated PAB in accordance with its 350,000 in FY 78 to initiate this study.

A cetailed statement of work has not been developed.

p The Uasta ihnage:"ent Program and PAB are in the process of their studies on acceptable risk to ensure that their a ng studies are not redundant yet consistent, respective r :.

Several program activities in the Office of Standards covel will provide information useful to developing acceptable risk op::ent criteria. These include a $2 nillion contractual effort by Pacific

.0 Northwest Laboratories to ovaluato the decoraissioning and d R

of generic fuel cycle facilities, a $200,000 i

.t 2ct itamina tio..

level discussions with EPA's Division of Critoria contractual effort L

[D O. "

r ng on the development of practical criteria for cleanup of restoratio S'

ards type situations.

T-The Offica of Standards Developnent also has Q.'

proposed studies to support the detcrmination o gs criteria.

for risk reduction and a study on the role of risk per RP~,

y in determining such expenditures (see SECY-76-474) p on

.I, I k'

y o mc e-o uv e.

TRCFORM 388 (9 76) NRC'{ 0240 3,

W u. s. aovs==unwv eniser =e omese s ue -ene-ea4

i j

.s

?

c--

m i ',

Comissioner Kennedy "--

(

8

?

Informal meetings between NRC staff and EPA staff to coordinate their respective programs in waste canagement, including acceptable risk guidelines, have been taking place at approximately two week intervals.

i Ori. lar! C'- mi by

~

g i

Ilichn > E.

ningham t

Sheldon licyers, Director Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety t.

I Cnc1csure:

Hote for TRehn fr BUhite dated 9/23/77 cc: Chaiman liendrie Comnissioner Gilinsky f

Comnissioner Bradford i

Distribution:

Central File RBriinogue F

NMSS r/f RGSmith WM r/f JXastner LLW r/f ICRoberts L. :l; CVSmith,Jr.

EFConti SMeyers Stevine p3-RECunningham CPJupiter

? ",

WPBishop IBWall JCAalaro McCullingford

~ '. ' '

MJBell CBBartlett IM WMGrayson TRehm I.' i.

WHewitt Eleins NMSS 942 EFBranagan BClausser FC680 WBFroloff File:

M.

RBleachman LVGossick R8ernero u"'

SSmiley t.

c.:. 1

( ;-

e g L.

e NMSS

/

  • Concurred by phone per EFBranagan CVSmith,Jr.

r< Cuntlingilam Meye/

rs E'

10/17/77

/

10g/77 0/$

I-FC:LLWDU FC;LLW FC.hTW FC:WM SO OCSYE o,,, e,,

EEBranagan/l1 Ad CM tato.

WP RGSmith*

&Stevine e--.*

10////77 10/07/77 101/g/77 10/12/Z7__

10//O/77

/. /77 NRCTORM 313 (9 76) NRCM C240 D us s. eovannuswy enistime orwicts tote -ene.es2 d