ML19290F096

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Re Preparation of Facility Ser.Review of Application Is Being Actively Pursued.Publication of SER Anticipated in Near Future
ML19290F096
Person / Time
Site: North Anna 
Issue date: 02/15/1980
From: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Ragone S
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
References
NUDOCS 8003180094
Download: ML19290F096 (1)


Text

m7 3 4.c 8 40g 6

ys

,(

Io, UNITED STATES

\\d>,

i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y})gg - E WASHf NGTON, D. C. 20555

.%'\\s, v/,
j c.

+...*

FEB 151980 Mr. Stanley Ragone, President Virginia Electric and Power Company Richmond, Virginia 23261

Dear Mr. Ragone:

In your letter of January 17, 1980, you stated that based on discussions between your licensing representatives and the NRC staff that a concerted effort is under way to prepare the Safety Evaluation Report for Sequoyah, Unit 1.

You also indicated that you are encouraged that work is proceeding on Sequoyah, but that you are disappointed that the staff is not pursuing a review of the North Anna Power Station, Unit 2 licensing on the same schedule.

It should be pointed out that we have recently met with your staff regarding the review of the North Anna application. As discussed with your staff, we are actively pursuing the preparation of a Safety Evaluation Report for the North Anna Power Station, Unit 2, concurrently with that for Sequoyah, and we anticipate publication of that document in the near future. The decision, however, to issue an operating license as indicated in the Policy Statement on the TMI-2 accident issued by the Commission on October 4, 1979, will require action by the Commission itself.

I trust that the above information is responsive to your ccncern. Let me assure you that the review of the North Anna Power Station, Unit 2 application is being actively pursued.

Sincerely, MN S

Harold R. Denton, Director Office of N: clear Reactor Regulation g 0 0 318 00%

/ i :C

'i REGULAluRY INFUNMATION UISTHIdUTIUN SYSIEM (HIUS)

ACCLSSION NUR:8001230194 UUC.UAlt 80/01/17 NOTARIZhus NU UUCKET 8 FACIL 50-339 North Anna Power Station, Unit d, Virginia tiectric &

05000339

~AUTH.NAME AUInUR'AFFILIATIUN HUGort,5 Virginia Efectric & Power Co.

e HtCIP.c4AME RLCIPIENT AFFILIATION l

y UE4iurd,N.R.

Uffici of' Nuclear' Reactor Regulation 6,..

M.

SudJLCT3 Requests that NHC proceed w/ license review of facility Unit h$

is ready for fuel loading. Implementation of Lessons Learned Task Force requirements was diligently oursued,Util has committeo to training program re natural circul5 tion.

DISTRIBUTIUN COUL; XE013 COPIES HECEIVEUILTH _L ENCL d SIZEi b IITLE: Exec. Corresponcence { iio Specifid Ukt. Irans.'t6'Oest6n/

m

s..

NUiLS:Lff__.Kf__4L/4.fdE[8fR4 'Y~0 86'TFA/V%d?J.Vf_A-P ~4 A A*B A R O. B l?A d I'.

LM*/66LT, /-K 'WGNA*MX/8.T48 M.V FVfpW4Mrda ' ' * ~'

~

G' HECIPIENI CUPIES RECIPIENT CUPILS 10 COUE/NAME LITR ~ ENCL 10 CUUti/N AML LTTR ENCL INTENNA GNUFF,M.{U 1

[

TFHA/ ICY SUPENU 1

l

-. _.. - ~ -

r iP.

$I N'

j gL I

L R

r.

Y p..

B

f

.t-

.%.k E'

o. -

e 5"

I'.

b L

'e

's.

'o

,N

[IL E!!f y(~!;

)If' l

,~

t 1

i 8

O L

TUTAL NUMBER OF CUPIES REQUIHEU: LITH

/ ENCL

. f"'

VIROINTA Er.ecTarc Axo Powen COMPANY Racunown,V:no NIA 23261 sri t.

aioo..

January 17, 1980 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office Of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

Dear Mr. Denton:

It is my understanding based on discussions our licensing representatives have had with NRC project personnel recently that a concerted effort is under way to prepare the Safety Evaluation Report for issuance of a low power license for Sequoyah Unit 1.

We are encouraged to learn that work is proceeding for issuance of that license, but I am disappointed that the staff is not actively pursuing a review of North Anna Unit 2 license on the same schedule-We believe they should be pursued simultaneously, especially since our unit has been essentially completed and ready for fuel loading since July 1979.

Vepco has diligently pursued the implementation of the short-term lessons learned recommendations following TMI.

Also, the Company has committed to a special training test program similar to TVA to enable our operators to actually observe the effects of natural circulation in the primary coolant system.

One overriding situation that should encourage the NRC to concentrate on getting North Anna Unit 2 in service as soon as possible by taking the steps necessary to attain fuel leading and power ascension is the major reduction in oil consumption that the placing of this unit has on our system and the nation as a whole.

TVA is primarily a coal-burning utility and the Sequoyah unit will displace coal, not oil.

North Anna Unit 2 will primarily displace oil, most of it imported.

At a 60% capacity factor, each month's improvement in placing our unit in full service reduces the Company's and nation's dependence on this oil by approximately three-quarters to one million barrels per month.

The President has taken a strong position with regard to reducing oil imports, and he has endorsed the need for nuclear power to meet this nation's basic energy needs.

The Company is striving, through our nuclear program and coal conversion program (1224 FSJ already converted from oil back to coal, with 239 FR7 additional capacity scheduled for 1980 and 394 MW for 1982 conversions back to coal), to comply with his plea to reduce oil consumption.

The NRC therefore should be making every possible effort to get those nuclear units in service that dis-place oil as quickly as possible.

gj f ooie 3019 IE -

4

..,. w vi.om. ri.scr.ic 4w powra coum to Mr. Harold R. Denton Page 2 1/17/80 In past correspondence, I have conveyed to you the grave consequences of the nuclear licensing pause.

In the latter half of 1979, major power purchases from neighboring utilities were necessary to maintain reliability and to try to reduce the consumption of high quantities of oil required to replace North Anna Unit 2.

This detri-mentally impacted on Vepco's ratepayers through higher electric bills and capital requirements.

Carrying the unused investment in North Anna Unit 2 continues to mount, and this will further impact on Vepco's customers and the economic well-being of the area we serve.

We understand the Special Inquiry 9tudy (Rogovin Report) will be submitted to the NRC by January 25.

Following that it would appear that the Commission could proceed promptly with the issuance of opera-ting licenses well before mid-February for North Anna Unit 2, Sequoyah Unit 1 and possibly others.

I sincerely hope that you will pursue the North Anna Unit 2 license as fast and diligently as is humanly possible to get this unit in service promptly.

I respectively request that licensing of North Anna Unit 2 proceed in parallel with the Sequoyah unit for the reasons stated above.

If you have any questions or would like.to meet to dis-cuss this, please let me know.

Since ely, e '-

-f/

x~

Rp[one Stanle SR/eeh cc:

The Honorable Charles W. Duncan, Jr.,

Department of Energy Virginia Congressional Delegation

.