ML19290F084
| ML19290F084 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/11/1980 |
| From: | Crossman W, Gilbert L, Martin L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19290F080 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-445-79-28, 50-446-79-27, NUDOCS 8003180073 | |
| Download: ML19290F084 (7) | |
See also: IR 05000445/1979028
Text
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION IV
Report No. 50-445/79-28; 50-446/79-27
Docket No. 50-445; 50-446
Category A2
Licensee: Texas Utilitier Generating Company
2001 Bryan Tower
Dallas, Texas
75201
Facility Name:
Comanche Peak, Units 1 and 2
Inspection at:
Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Glen Rose, Texas
Inspection conducted: December 4-7 and 10-13, 1979
Inspectors:
' /
////
,
gI!. E. Martin, Reactor' Inspector, Engineering
/Date
7
Support Section (Paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 5 & 6)
/h
80
L. D.' Gilbert, Reactor Inspector, Engineering
/ Hate
Support Section (Paragraph 3)
Other Accompanying
Personnel:
M. T. Pardinek, Engineering Aide (Co-Op)
Approved:
'
W. A. Crossman, Chief, Projects Section
Dste
l/
R. E. Hall, Chief, Engineering Support Section
/Date
8003180073
.
Inspection Summary:
Inspection on December 4-7 & 10-13, 1979 (Report No. 50-445/79-28; 50-446/79-27)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of construction activities
including site tour; review of QA program for the Unit 1 preservice inspec-
tion; electrical equipment maintenance and storage; and electrical construc-
tion and inspection procedures. The inspection involved eighty-one inspector-
hours by two NRC inspectors.
Results:
Of the four areas inspected, one apparent item of noncompliance
was identified in one area (infraction - failure to provide appropriate
instructions for installation of electrical panel
paragraph 4).
_
2
.
.
DETAILS
.
1.
Persons Contacted
Principal Licensee Emplovees
- J. B. George, TUSI, Project General Manager
- R. G. Tolson, TUGCO, Site QA Supervisor
- J. V. Hawkins, TUGCO/G&H Product Assurance Supervisor
- J. Merritt, TUSI, Engineering and Construction Manager
Other Personnel
H. Glover, QC Inspector, (B&R)
P. Van Teslaar, Site Manager, Westinghouse
_
- denotes those attending the exit interview.
2.
Site Tour
The IE inspectors walked through the Unit 1 Reactor Building and
Auxiliary Building to observe construction activities in progress and
to inspect housekeeping.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Preservice Inspection - Unit 1
The IE inspector reviewed the Westinghouse Quality Assurance program
for preservice inspection activities being performed by the Nuclear
Services Division of Westinghouse in accordance with the Agreement
of Settlement between TUSI and Westinghouse dated December 16, 1977.
The following documents were reviewed for applicable Quality Assurance
requirements:
QA Plan (NSD-PA-001)
Product Assurance Manual (WCAP-8266)
Preservice and Inservice Inspection Documentation Procedure
(OPS-NSD-101)
In the areas reviewed, no discrepancies from the requirements of FSAR
Section 17 were noted.
In discussions with TUGCO, it was determined that TUGC0 planned to
include in their QA program a procedure to assure that the nondestruc-
tive examination (NDE) reports, to be submitted by Westinghouse for
3
preservice inspection, are reviewed and any indication evaluated to
Section XI, ASME B&PV Code requirements.
This matter is considered unresolved pending issuance of the procedure.
4.
Electrical Systems
a.
Review of Procedures
The IE inspector reviewed the following specifications, procedures
and design change authorizations for compliance with 10 CFR 50,
FSAR, and applicable industry standards:
(1) 2323-ES-100, Rev. 1, " Electrical Specification"
(2)
CP-QAP-7.2, Rev. 3, "QC Receiving Inspection"
(3) QI-QAP-7.2-AD, Rev. 1, " Receiving of Electrical Equipment"
(4) QI-QAP-7<2-11, Rev. 1, " Receiving TUSI/G&H Procured Safety
Related Equipment"
(5)
CP-QP-8.0, Rev. O, " Receiving Inspections"
(6)
CP-QP-11.8, Rev. 1, " Instrumentation and Control Inspection
Activities"
,
(7) 35-1195-ECP-19, Rev. 4, " Exposed Conduit and Conduit Hanger
Fabrication & Installation"
(8) 35-1195-EEI-4, Rev. O, " Cable Pulling and Termination of
Lighting Wire"
(9) 35-1195-EEI-S, Rev. O, "Meggering of Class IE Cable"
(10) 35-1195-EEI-6, Rev. 4, " Cable Pull Cards and Vault Control"
(11) 35-1195-EEI-7, Rev. 2, " Cable Pulling"
(12) 35-1195-EEI-8, Rev. 2, " Class IE and Non IE Cable Termination"
(13)
CP-QP-0.3, Rev. 74, " Electrical Inspection Manual" - 64 of 71
procedures as listed on the Table of Contents were reviewed,
with the exception of CEI-20, CMP-6.3, CPM-6.10, QAP-15.1,
CP-QP-2.1, QI-QP-10.1-2, and QA-QP-11.3-13
Fourty-four Design Change Authorizations relating to Electrical
Specification 2323-ES-100 and the installation of electrical
equipment were reviewed.
.
4
.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
b.
Observation of Electrical Equipment Maintenance and Installation
(1) The IE inspector made an in plant and warehouse tour to
observe implementation of storage and maintenance requirements
for electrical equipment.
The IE inspector witnessed the
shaft rotation portion of the maintenance requirements on the
Unit 1 Centrifugal Charging Pumps. The maintenance instructions
and records for the Unit I and Unit 2 Residual Heat Removal
Pump motors, Centrifugal and Positive Displacement Charging
Pump motors, Auxiliary Feedwater Pump motors, Component
Cooling Water Pump motors, Safety Injection Pump motors, and
Unit 1 Diesel Generators were reviewed.
(2) The IE inspector reviewed the following construction
Operation Travelers for anchoring and installation of
electrical equipment:
Const. Operational Traveler No.
Equipment Name
EE 79-006-02AB
6.9 KV SWGR 1EA1
EE 79-007-02AB
6.9 KV SWGR LEA 2
EE 79-010-02AF
480 VAC SWGR lEB2
EE 79-016-02AI
480 VAC MCC XEB1-2
EE 79-037-01DE
Battery Rack BTIED2
EE 79-131-02AB
Unit 1 Hot Shutdown Panel
The IE inspector inspected the completed installation of the
above equipment to determine compliance, adequacy, and
applicability of the requirements specified by the Operational
Travelers.
During the inspection of the Unit 1 Hot Shutdown Panel, the
IE inspector found two pieces of 2 inch angle iron inside
the walk-in section of the panel. A subsequent review of
Design Change Authorization (DCA) 5859, Rev. 3 indicated
that the two pieces of steel were to have been used to pro-
vide to-the-floor supports for the air conditioning unit of
the panel.
IEEE Standard 336, 1971, as committed to in Chapter 8 of the
CPSES FSAR requires in paragraph 2.3 that installation and
5
..
,
inspection of Class IE equipment be performed in accordance
with the latest information and shall include as appropriate,
approved construction drawings, installation specifications,
manufacturer's instructions, etc.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V requires appropriate
documented instructions or procedures to accomplish activities
affecting quality.
Contrary to the above:
Construction Operational Traveler EE 79-131-02AB, which was
the lead document provided by B&R engineering for Unit 1 Hot
Shutdown Panel, does not provide the necessary technical
instructions for the complete installation and inspection of
this panel.
'As a result of the failure to provide instructions that pre-
scribe or properly reference documents that prescribe the
complete installation requirements, the Unit 1 Hot Shutdown
Panel was not properly installed and inspected.
The only drawing referenced on Traveler EE 79-131-02AB was
the General Arrangement Drawing 2323-El-0717-01, Rev. 4,
which indicates the floor elevation and column line location
of the panel. The Traveler did not reference or address any
other construction drawings or manufacturer drawings or
instructions pertaining to installation of the panel.
DCA 5859 was referenced in the Operational Traveler to pro-
vide the welding details for the panel base.
One of the
attachments to DCA 5859 was a Gibbs & Hill Drawing (Fig.1)
which indicates the floor attachment method and location of
the additional supports.
These additional supports were
bolted type connections utilizing hardware supi'i,ed by the
manufacturer and a base plate to be supplied by the customer.
The DCA further requires the utilization of Reliance (Mfg)
Drawing M-LV0170IF and Gibbs & Hill Drawing SI-608 in
mounting this panel. The Operational Traveler only referenced
the welding operation of the installation.
The DCA was not a
requirement for the total installation or subsequent inspection.
As a result, these supports were not installed and the
installation of the Hot Shutdown Panel was inspected and
signed off as complete.
The failure to provide appropriate instructions to accomplish
activities affecting quality is a failure to comply with
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V.
This is an infraction.
6
'
'
..
5.
Unresolved Items
Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required
in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of non-
compliance, or deviations. An unresolved item disclosed during the
inspection is discussed in paragraph 3.
6.
Exit Interview
The IE inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in para-
graph 1) and R. G. Taylor (NRC Resident Reactor Inspector) at the con-
clusion of the inspection on December 15, 1979.
The IE inspectors sum-
marized the purpose, scope and findings of the inspection.
The licensee
representatives acknowledged the statements by the inspectors with
regard to the item of noncompliance and the unresolved item.
.
7