ML19290E602

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Corrected Page 8 of Tribes Brief on Review.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML19290E602
Person / Time
Site: Skagit
Issue date: 02/21/1980
From: Swanson D, Treby S
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To:
Shared Package
ML19290E598 List:
References
NUDOCS 8003140264
Download: ML19290E602 (3)


Text

.

tempts to secure their rights.

The state's extraordinary machindtions in resisting the [1974] decree have forced the district court to take over a large share of the management o f the s tate 's fishery in order to enforce its decrees.

Except for some desegregation cases [ citations omitted] the district court has faced the most concerted official and private efforts to frustrate a decree of a federal court witnessed in this century.

The challenged orders in this appeal must be reviewed by this court in the context of events forced by litigants who offered the court no reasonable choice.

Pucet Sound Gillnetter:s Association v.

United States District Co u r_t_, 573 F.2d 1123, 1126 (9th Cir. 1978), quoted in Washington v.

Washington Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association, 99 S.Ct. at 3080, n.36 (1979).

Petitioners Intervene As Governments1 The tribes are not seeking to intervene as aggrieved households or as anti-nuclear factions.

Each of the tribal governments operates under a constitution and by-laws ap-proved by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with the Indian Reorganization Acc 23 U.S.C.

S476.

The tribes' position can perhaps be clarified by reviewing legal authority concerning the governraental status of tribes.

It has always been a part of our legal history that Indian tribes are " distinct, independent political cortunities."

Worcester v.

Georgia, 31 U.S.

(6 Pet.) 515, 559 (1332)

This concept has not been outmoded by the passage of time :

Indian tribes are " distinct, independent, d lS N

+

's/

N, k

t : (* h.3 k,

1

~

9 o e.

-c. y 4

s: -

ib2 he@j) [;l b

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A-3 gtgQay NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0mIISSION j.

ax ;;sgg,

s.

r BEFORE THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMIISSIOI ' N U,

i!b\\

In the Matter of

)

)

PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT

)

DOCKETS No. 50-522 COMPANY, et al.,

)

50-523

)

(Skagit Muclear Power Proj ect,)

Units 1 and 2)

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

)

February 21, 1980 I hereby certify that copies of the following:

Letter to Secretary Chilk dated February 21, 1980 describing Errata in " Petitioner Tribes Brief On Review."

Subs titute page 8 in " Petitioner Tribes Brief on Review."

in the above-captioned proceeding were served upon the persons shown on the attached list by depositing copies thereof in the United States Mail, with proper first class postage attached, on the 21st day of r bruary, 1980.

g w

RUSSELL W.

BUSCH Attorney for Upper Skagit and Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribes 520 Smith Towcr 506 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 464-5888

'lhomas Moser Dr. Frank F. Hooper, Member CFSP and F0B Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Atomic Safety & Licensing Bd.

E. Stachon and L. Marbet Skagit Co'.mty Courthouse Schoci e' Natural Resources 19142 5. Bakers Ferry Road Mt. Vernon, WA 98273 Univers.ty of Michigan Boring, Oregon 97009 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Richard D. Bach, Esq.

Alan P. O' Kelly Rives, Bonhyadi, Drummond &

Gustave A. Linenberger,.Hember Paine, Lowe, Coffin, Heman &

Smith Atomic Safety & Licensing Bd.

920 S.W. 6th Ave O' Kelly U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

1400 Wash. Trust Finan. Ctr.

1400 Public Service Bldg.

'4ashington, D.C.

20555 Spokane, WA 99204 Portlant, OR 97204 Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman Comm. Victor Gilinsky Docketing & Service Section Atomic Safety & Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Appeal Board Washington, D.C.

20555 Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Washington,'D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20555 Dr. John H. Buck, Member Com{nioner Richard Kennedy Richvo L. Black, Esq.

Atomic Safety & Licensing U.S. Nucle u Regulatory Comm.

Cuunsel for NRC Staff Appeal Board Washington, D.C.

20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20555 Valentine B. Deale, Chaiman Michael C. Farrar, Member Joseph Hendrie, Commissica r Atomic Safety & Licensing Bd.

l Atomic Safety & Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm' 1001 Connecticut Ave. N.W.

Appeal Board Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C.

20036 l

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n.

Washington, D.C.

20555 Nicholas D. Lewis, Chaiman F. Tneodore Thomsen Energy Facility Site Evaluation Commissioner Peter Bradford Parkins, Coie. Stone, Olsen &

Council U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Williacs 820 East Fifth Avenue Washington, D.C.

20555 1900 Washingtoa Bldg.

Olympia, HA 98504 Seattic, WA 98273 Robert C. Schofield, Director John Ahearne, Chaiman Richard M. Sandvik, Esq.

Skagit County Planning Dept.

U.S. Nuclear Regulaturf5 Comm' Asst. Atty. General 120 West Kincaid Street Washington, D.C.

205 Dept. of Justice Mount Vernon, WA 98273 520 S.W. Yamhill, 500 Pac. Bld.

Portland, Oregon 97204 Canadian Consulate General Robert Lowenstein, Esq.

Peter A. van Brakel. Vice Consul Roger M. Leed, Esq.

- Lowenstein, Newman, Reis &

412 P1azh 600 1411 - 4th Ave. Bldg.

Suite 610 Axelrad 6th and Stewart Street 1025 Connecticut Ave. N.W.

Seattle,,WA 98101 Seattle, WA 98101

-Washington, D.C.

20036

.,m H.H. Phillips Esq.

Warren Hastings, Esq.

Vice Pres. & Corporate Counsel Portland General Electric Co.

121 S.W. Salmon Street 121 S.W. salmon street Portland, Oregon 97204 Portland, OR 97204

__.