ML19289D620

Amend 20 to DPR-71 Changing Tech Specs Re Containment Atmosphere Control Standby Gas Treatment Sys

ML19289D620
Person / Time
Site:	Brunswick
Issue date:	02/14/1979
From:	Ippolito T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML19289D621	List: ML19289D620 ML19289D623 ML20104A273
References
NUDOCS 7903080530
Download: ML19289D620 (5)

Text

,

j

• g UNITED STATES y*

' 'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20666

\\.s.../

CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-325 BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 20 License No. DPR-71 1.

The Nuc1 car Regulatory Comission (the Commission) has found that:

A.

The application for amendment by Carolina Power & Light Company (the licensee) dated February 6, 1979, complies with the stand-ards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations sat forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.

The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C.

There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D.

The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.

The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

2.

Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Spec-ifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-71 is hereby amended to read as follows:

(2) Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 20, are I:areby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

790soa953a

2-3.

This ficense amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance.

~

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Ot /gs<

L Thomas A.'Ippolito, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Operating Reactors

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: Februa ry 14, 1979

ATTACHr1ENT TO LICENSE Af1ENDMENT NO. 20 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. DPR-71 DOCKET N0. 50-325 Replace the following pages of the Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A of the above-indicated license with the attached pages.

The changed area of the revised page is reflected by a marginal line.

Remove Insert 3/4 6-25*

3/4 6-25*

3/4 6-26 1/4 6-26

• 0verleaf pages - no change

CONTAIMMENT SYSTEMS 3 /4. 6. 6 LONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE CONTROL STANDBY GAS TREATMENT SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION

3. 6. 6.1 Two independent Standby Gas Treatment System subsystems shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY-CONDITIONS 1, 2, 3, 5 and *.

ACTION:

a.

With one standby gas treatment subsystem inoperable:

1.

In CONDITION 1, 2 or 3, restore the inoperable subsystem to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

2.

In CONDITION 5 or *, restore the inoperable subsystem to OPERABLE status within 31 days or suspend irradiated fuel handling in the secondary containment, CORE ALTERATIONS or operations that could reduce the SHUTDOWN MARGIN. The pro-visions of Specification 3.0.3 are not applicable.

b.

With both standby gas treatment subsystems inoperable; 1.

In CONDITION 1, 2 or 3, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the next 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

2.

In CONDITION 5 or *, suspend all irradiated fuel handling in the secondary containment, CORE ALTERATIONS or operations that could reduce the SHUTDOWN MARGIN. The provisions of Specifica-tion 3.0.3 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.6.6.1 Each standby gas treatment subsystem shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a.

At least once per 31 days by initiating, from the control room, flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers and verifying that the system operates for at least 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> with the heaters on automatic control.

• When irradiated fuel is being nandled in the secondary containment.

BRUNSWICK - UNIT 2 3/4 6-25

II CONTAINMENT SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued)

~

b.

At least once per la months or (1) after any structural nain-tenance on the HEPA t11ter or charcoal adsorber housings, or (2) following painting, fire or chemical release in any venti-lation zone communicating with the system by:

1.

Verifying that the cleanup system satisfies the in-place testing acceptance criteria and uses the test procedures of Regulatory Positions C.S.a., C.5.c and C.S.d of Regula-tory Guide 1.52, Revision 1. July 1976, and the system flow rate is 3000 cfm + 10%.

2.

Verifying within 31 days after renoval that a laboratory analysis of a representative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1. July 1976, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C.6.a of Regula-tory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976.

3.

Verifying a system flow rate of 3000 cfm + 10% during system operation when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1975.

c.

After every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of charcoal adsorber operation by verifying within 31 days after removal that a laboratory analysis of representative carbon sample obtained in accord-ance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.53, Revision 1 July 1976, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C.6.a of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976.

d.

At. least once per 18 months by.:

1.

Verifying that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks is < 8.5 inches Water Gauge while operating the filter train at a flow rate of 3000 cfm + 10%.

2.

Verifying that the filter train starts on each secondary containment isolation test signal.

3.

Verifying that the heaters will dissipate at least 15.2 kw when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1975.

BRUNSWICK - UNIT 2 3/4 6-26 Amendment No. 20

8 UNITED STATES y*

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20566 t

8

%,.....f CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-324 BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 44 License No. DPR-62 1.

The Nuclear Regulatory Comission (the Comission) has found that:

A.

The application for amendment by Carolina Power & Light Company (the licensee) dated February 6, 1979, complies with the stand-ards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.

The facility will operate in confomity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Comission; C.

There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Comission's regulations; D.

The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the comon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.

The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Comission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

2.

Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Spec-ifications as indicated in the attachment to thic license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-62 is hereby amended to read as follows:

(2) Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 44, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

t i

. 3.

This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

/

ThomasA.y;2abilo difff Ippolito, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Operating Reactors

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance:

February 14, 1979

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDt1ENT N0. 44 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. DPR-62 DOCKET N0. 50-324 Replace the following pages of the Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A of the above indicated license with the attached pages.

The changed area of the page is reflected by a marginal line.

Remove Insert 3/4 6-25*

3/4 6-25*

3/4 6-26 3/4 6-26

• 0verleaf pages - no change

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 3/4.6.6 CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE CONTROL STANDBY GAS TREATMENT SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.6.1 Two independent Standby Gas Treatment System subsystems shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: CONDITIONS 1, 2, 3, 5 and *.

ACTION:

With one standby gas treatment subsystem inoperable:

a.

1.

In CONDITION 1, 2 or 3, restore the inoperable subsystem to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the foJ10 wing 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

2.

In CONDITION 5 or *, restore the inoperable subsystem to OPERABLE status within 31 days or suspend irradiated fuel handling in the secondary containment, CORE ALTERATIONS or operations that could reduce the SHUTDOWN MARGIN. The pro-visions of Specification 3.0.3 are not applicable.

b.

With both standby gas treatment subsystems inoperable; 1.

In CONDITION 1, 2 or 3, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the next 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

2.

In CONDITION 5 or *, suspend all irradiated fuel handling in the secondary containment, CORE ALTERATIONS or operations that could reduce the SHUTDOWN MARGIN. The provisions of Specifica-tion 3.0.3 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.6.6.1 Each standby gas treatment subsystem shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a.

At least once per 31 days by initiating, from the control room, flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers and verifying that the system operates for at least 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> with the heaters on automatic control.

• When irradiated fuel is being handled in the secondary containment.

BRUNSWICK - UNIT 1 3/4 6-25

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued) w b.

At least once per 18 months or (1) after any structural main-tenance on the HEPA filter or charcoal adsorber housings, or (2) following painting, fire or chemical release in any venti-lation zone communicating with the system by:

1.

Verifying that the cleanup system satisfies the in-place testing acceptance criteria and uses the test procedures of Regulatory Positions C.S.a., C.5.c and C.5.d of Regula-tory Guide 1.52 Revision 1, July 1976, and the system flow rate is 3000 cfm + 10%.

~

2.

Verifying within 31 days af ter removal that a laboratory analysis of a representative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1 July 1976, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C.6.a of Regula-tory Guide 1.52 Revision 1 July 1976.

3.

Verifying a system flow rate of 3000 cfm + 10% during system operation when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1975.

c.

After every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of charcoal adsorber operation by verifying within 31 days after removal that a laboratory analysis of representative carbon sample obtained in accord-ance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.53, Revision 1, July 1976, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C.6.a of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976.

d.

At least once per 18 months by,:

1.

Verifying that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks is < 8.5 inches Water Gauge while operating the filter train at a flow rate of 3000 cfm + 10%.

2.

Verifying that the filter train starts on each secondary containment isolation test signal.

.3.

Verifying that the heaters will dissipate at least 15.2 kw when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1975.

BRUNSWICK - UNIT 1 3/4 6-26 Amendment No. 44

.