ML19282D086
| ML19282D086 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/28/1979 |
| From: | Hunter V, Whitesell D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19282D085 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900104 NUDOCS 7905110404 | |
| Download: ML19282D086 (5) | |
Text
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No. 99900104/79-01 Company:
Westinghouse Electric Corporation Pensacola Plant Post Office Box 1313 Pensacola, Florida 32596 Inspection Conducted:
February 5-8, 1979 Inspector l/
- u SI-#A 79 V. H. Hunter, Contractor Inspector, Vendor Date Inspection Branch m
Approved by M -
M.ft- ##
D. E. Whitesell, ComponentsSection I, Vendor Date Inspection Branch Suninary Inspection on February 5-8, 1979 (99900104/79-01)
Areas Inspected:
Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criteria and applicable Cedes and standards, including action on previous findings, inspections and tests, and weld material control.
The inspection involved twenty-five (25) inspector-hours on site.
Results:
In the three (3) areas inspected, no apparent deviations or aresolved items were identified.
79051104oy
Details A.
Persons Contacted
- F. B. Hyland, Product Assurance Manager
- J. N. Martinez, Design Engineering Manager
~
- W. R. Rosenberge, Planning and Operations Manager
- G. E. Callender, QA Engineering Manager
- J. E. Cooper, Quality Assurance Engineer
- W. R. Bullivant, Quality Assurance Engineer
- M. L. Ferguson, Quality Assurance Engineer J. J. Robers, Welding Inspector
- Denotes those present at the Exit Interview meeting.
B.
General 1.
As of January 1979, the Pensacola facility was reclassified as a " plant" rather than the previous designation of " Division."
2.
Due to a recent reorganization, the following changes of personnel and positions were noted; K. Starks to Plant Manager R. Goss to Manager of Operations R. Latta to Manag'er of Manufacturing Planning 3.
The principle product of the Pensacola facility is reactor internals. However, management indicated that there are plans to fabricate pressurizers, in part or whole, that are currently being fabricated at the Tampa facility.
C.
Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Deviation (Report No. 77-02): Training / Indoctrination for new hire design engineer not accomplished.
It was verified that Training / Indoctrination for new hires had been completed and that training sessions had been conducted and documented in accordance with approved procedures.
D.
Manufacturing Process Control Welding Material Control 1.
Objective The objective of this area of the inspection was to verify that welding material was identified and controlled until it was
consumed in the process in accordance with the customer's design specifications, ASME Code, and applicable NRC Regulations.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The objectives of this area of the inspection were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the ASME accepted Quality Assurance Manual, Section 8.0, titled " Welding Quality Assurance," and Procedure No. PE-15-04-019, Revision 4, titled " Shop Control of Welding and Brazing Materials," to verify that procedures had been established for purchasing, receiving, distribution, and handling of welding materials.
b.
Review of weld material holding areas to verify distribution of welding material was controlled in accordance with approved procedures and unused welding materials are scrapped or recycled in accordance with special procedures.
c.
Observation in shop welding area and storage area to verify that:
(1) Welding materials are clearly identified at all times in accordance with approved procedures, and the identifica-tion as acceptable material is maintained through-out storage and manufacturing until the material is consumed in the welding process.
(2) Welding material requiring environmental control is held at the appropriate holding and/or baking tempera-ture for the time specified in the procedure.
d.
Observed in-process welding of a tank nozzle weld and upper support column assembly in accordance with weld procedure 533, Revision 4, and 363-1, Revision 4, respectively.
e.
Interviews with personnel to verify they are knowledgeable of the vendors procedures applicable to Welding Material Control.
3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection, there were no apparent deviations or unresolved items identified.
. E.
Inspections and Tests 1.
Objectives The cbjectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that the nondestructive tesing procedures, used by the vendor, meets ASME Code requirements, applicable NRC regulations, and contractual requirements.
Further, to verify that these procedures are being utilized by q;alified personnel in accordance with the vendors approved Quality Assurance Program.
2.
Method of Accomalishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of Section 9.0 of the ASME accepted QA Manual titled " Nondestructive Examination, Qualification and Control."
b.
Review of the following NDE procedures:
(1) Radiography Nos. 8275, Revision 0, 8278, Revision 0, 8282, Revision 3, and 8285, Revision 3.
(2) Ultrasonic Nos. 8504, Revision 2, 8507, Revision 2, and 8520, Revision 1.
(3) Liquid Penetrant Nos. 8100, Revision 3, and 8101, Revision 2.
c.
Review of five (5) personnel qualifications including the Level III Examiner to verify that the qualification were certified in accordance with SNT-TC-1A.
d.
Observed the following in-process nondestructive tests including procedure review, performance, and documented results:
(1) Radiography of the longitudinal weld of the upper barrel of a four (4) loop internals vessel identified by serial number 43858.
(2) Ultrasonic examination of the electron beam welds on the guide tube enclosures, identified by serial numbers 43757, 41736, and 41733.
Note: There was no liquid penetrant or magnetic particle tests in progress during this inspection.
. 3.
Findings During this phase of the inspection, there were no apparent deviations or unresolved items identified.
F.
Exit Interview The inspector met with management representatives (denoted in para-graph A) at the conclusion of the inspection on December 15, 1978.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.
The management representatives had no comment in response to each item discussed by the inspector.
.