Text

Core Spray Sparger & Steam Baffle Design Rept, App 5 to GE Rept NEDC-21974.Prepared for GE
	ML19282C626
Person / Time
Site:	Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date:	03/28/1979
From:	Humiston G; NUS CORP.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML19282C622	List: ML19282C621; ML19282C626;
References
	NEDC-21974, NUS-3234B-ADD, NUDOCS 7903300403
	Download: ML19282C626 (55)
	v • d • e

-

e g

APPENOlX V TO GENERAL ELECTRIC REPORT NEDC-21974 NUS 3234B THE BIG ROCK POINT e

SPARGER RING TEST PROGRMI ADDENDUM O

March 1979 e

e e

e 7903300463

NUS 3234B ADDENDUM APPENDIX V TO GENERAL ELECTRIC REPORT NEDC-21974 BIG ROCK POINT CORE SPRAY SPARGER AND STEAM SAFFLE DESIGN REPORT THE BIG ROCK POINT SPARGER RING TEST PROGRAM Prepared for THE GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY under GE PURCHASE ORDER - 2C5G2E93 by G.

F. HUMISTON MARCH 1979 NUS CORPCRATION 2536 Countryside Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section and Title Page No.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1-1 2.0 PROCEDURES 2-1 3.0 TEST REPORT 3-1 3.1 Production Nozzle Testing 3-2 Bll-9 Revision 1 3.2 Pisduction Nozzle Testing Bll-9A 3-5 3.3 Shipping and Handling Requirements 3-6 Big Rock Point Core Spray Sparger Nozzles 3.4 Procedures 3-7 3.5 Results 3-8 3.6 Certifications and Insoection Reports 3-39 i

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Addendum contains supplemental inform & tion to Report No.

NUS 3234 and NUS 3234A and the information contained herein is a part of the subject report as if therein con-tained.

This Addendum contains the Test Report on the BRP Produc-tion Spray Nozzles (

Reference:

General Electric Test Re-quirement B11-9).

Raw data such as recorder charts, log sheets, etc. have been deleted from the test report because of their voluminous nature.

1-1

2.0 PROCEDURES The following procedures were used during all testing cov-ered by this Addendum.

They were:

o Operating Procedures for Big Rock Point Sparger Ring Tests, Revision II o

Big Rock Point Sparger Ring Tosts - Proce-dures for Locating the Sparger Ring in the Vessel, Revision 0 o

Big Rock Point Sparger Ring Tests - Proce-dures for Aiming Sparger Ring Spray Noz-zles, Revision 0 o

Data Reduction Procedures for Sparger Ring Analysis, Revision 1.

Copies of the above procedures are included in Appendix IV (NUS 3234A).

2-1

BIG ROCK POINT SPARGER RI"3 PROJECT TEST REPORT BIG ROCK POINT SPARGER PRODUCTION NOZZLE TESTING GENERAL ELECTRIC TEST REQUIREMENTS B11-9 Test Requirements Shipping and Handling Requirements Results Certifications SECTION 3.0 3-1

3.0 TEST REPORT 3.1 Production Nozzle Testing Bll-9 Revision 1 3.1.1 General Electric Test Requirement (Bil-9 Revision 1)

PURPOSE The purpose of this test is to show that the 36 nozzles that are assembled in the Big Rock Point production sparger give an adequate flow distribution relative to the flow pattern generated for the replacement sparger design verification.

DESCRIPTION A full scale mockup of the Big Rock Point reactor ves-sel/ core spray sparger ring / core (NUS'Bartow Facility) will be used in a series of tests to determine the core flow distribution for the core spray sparger production nozzles.

The production nozzles will be assembled on the test spar-ger and aimed to the requirements of the production spar-ger.

The production nozzles and test sparger will be test-ed for conditions which simulate the entire range of oper-ating conditions for the reactor and the core flow dis-tribution will be measured.

TEST REQUIREMENTS 1.

Using the NUS aiming light, aim each nozzle par the defined aiming pattern 1H of Test Requirements Bll-7 (Aiming Point should be repeatable within a cir-cle of 1-in diameter.)

2.

For each test run measure and record the following:

a. Steam pressure (psig) 3-2

b. Sparger inlet fl'ow (gpm)

c. Core flow distribution in 32 instrumented channel locations (gpm) 3.

Critical parameters are nozzle aiming point per Test Requirement 1 and all data shown in Test Re-quirement 2.

4.

With 36 nozzles, picked at random from the produc-tion lot and installed on the test sparger, perform the eight tests defined on Table 1.

5.

Repeat requirement 4 after all nozzles are removed O

and replaced at random, assuring that no nozzle is reassembled at the same location.

6a.

If the results of Requirements 4 and 5 show little differences and are in good agreement with the de-O sign goal as defined in GE Specification 22A5589,

" Core Spray Sparger Design Specification," proceed to Requirement 7.

6b.

If the results of Requirements 4 and 5 do not re-4 present the design goal, move and/or replace noz-zles to obtain as close to the design goal as pos-sible, and perform the eight tests defined on Table 1.

7.

When the tests described on Table 1 are complete, one nozzle is set aside for destructive examination and replaced.

The nozzle to be used shall be one that feeds an area at the edge of the core and an area with excessive flow.

8.

The replaced nozzle as well as one nozzle which is "as received" from the nozzle vendor will be sec-g tioned along the vertical axis and dye penetrant inspected for linear indications (cracks).

9.

If no linear indications are found in Requirement 8,

(threads excluded), the 35 tested nozzles and g

one replaced nozzle shall be cleaned as follows and bagged:

9 3-3

a.

All 36 nozzles shall be soaked for 10 min-utes in 180

+10 water with a chemistry of

<1 mhWCM and < 0.1 ppm Cl.

b.

Nozzles shall then be soaked in the same chemistry water at room temperature.

c.

Repeat steps (a) and (b).

d.

Dry and seal in plastic bags.

10.

Supply the 36 nozzles to GE for installation on the production sparger.

11.

During all of the foregoing tests a complete record of the serial numbers of the nozzles and their lo-cation on the test sparger must be maintained.

12.

If the nozzles tested were determined and tested per Requirement 4 and 5, a random location on the sparger with any of the production nozzles is ac-ceptable, although it is recommended that the test-ed nozzles be used.

If the nozzles tested were determined per require-4nent 6b, the nozzles must be positioned on the pro-duction sparger in the same location as they were tested on the test sparger.

TABLE 1 DESIGN CONFIGURATION TEST TEST MATRIX Vessel Sparger Sparger Steam Entry Pressure Flow Orientation Condition g

(psig)

(gpm) 0 90 180 270 Combined 75 292 1

1 1

1 x

50 359 1

x 25 416 1

x 0-5 456 1

x AIR 466 1

3-4

3.2 Production Nozzle Testing (Bll-9A) 3.2.1 General Electric Test Requirement (Bil-9A)

PURPOSE This addendum to the production nozzle testing requirement is required to define additional testing to improve the flow distribution obtained in Test Requirement B11-9, Revi-sion 1, Stqp 5 and determine if rotation of the nozzles has an effect on the flow distributica.

TEST REQUIREMENT 1.

Starting withithe nozzles as positioned for Test Re-quirement Step 5, Revision 1 of Test Requirement Bll-9 (NUS Test Runs 9-16), modify the test setup by rotating 180 each of nozzles 8, 11 and 20.

2.

Test the modified configuration per the following test matrix (three tests required) with the com-bined steam entry condition.

Vessel Sparger Sparger Orientation Pressure Flow 0

(psig)

(gpm) 0 90 180 270 75 292 2

1 3-$

3a.

If the results of Requirement 2 are in good agree-ment with the design goal as defined in GE Speifi-cation 22A5589, proceed to Requirement 7 of B11-9, Revision 1.

3b.

If the results of Requirement 2 show little change, proceed to Requirement 6B of Bll-9, Revision 1 and replace nozzles 8, 11 and 20 in an effort to obtain the design goal flow rate.

3.3 Shipping and Handling Recuirements for Big Rock Point Core Sprav Sparger Nozzles PURPOSE This document defines the minimum requirements for hand-ling, storage and shipping of the BBig Rock Point core spray sparger nozzles.

Nozzles as shipped from Spraying Systems Company will be clean and sealed in plastic bags.

It is the purpose of this document to maintain this degree of cleanliness.

REQUIREMENTS 1.

All incoming items shall be inspected on arrival for condition of the parts and/or its packaging.

If the packagi 1 (i.e.,

sealed bag) is found to be in good condition, nozzles can be stored in this condition.

2 Storage of unused nozzles is to be in a clean, con-trolled area.

A clean area is an area typical of a final inspection area.

A controlled area is one in which the nozzles cannot be interchanged with other similar parts or used by unauthorized personnel.

3.

All nozzles which are removed from the sealed plas-tic bags, for any reason, shall be cleaned per Re-quirement 9 of Test Requiremnt B11-9 before ship-ment.

3-6

9 4.

Nozzles which remain sealed in the package in which they arrived may be shipped as received.

9 5.

Packaging for shipment shall be per standard prac-tice for air shipment and to the designation iden-tified by GE.

G 3.4 Procedures The sparger ring was removed from the test vessel and in-g stalled in a special test alignment fixture with a target duplicating the tops of the channels in the test vessel.

The height of the target above the centerline of the spar-g ger ring was 64-3/4 in, which is equal to the 65 in. dis-tance in the test vessel between the simulated channel tops and the centerline of the sparger less inch for the thickness of the target plate used in the test vessel.

g Photographs of the test alignment fixture are shown in Fig-ures 1 through 3.

Thirty-six half-inch pipe nipples (Type 316 SS - Schedule G

40) were mitred and welded at angles which aligned each spray nozzle to its respective aiming point on the target grid.

Final aiming of the production spray nozzles was accomplished by use of the NUS nozzle alignment light.

O The sparger ring with the production spray nozzles was then installed in the Bartow test vessel in accordance with the operating procedure and spray nozzle alignment re-verified O

with the NUS nozzle alignment light.

After testing and prior to the removal of the production spray nozzles from the sparger ring, a small indent was O

placed on each spray nozzle indicating the point on the spray nozzle in the direction of the center of the vessel.

3-7

Accurate determination of this point was accomplished by means of an alignment tool extending from the spray nozzle being identified to the sparger boss opposite the spray nozzle.

The end of the alignment tool at the spray nozzle

" straddled" the spray nozzle snugly with an indicating mark at the center of the straddling element.

A permanent groove was then machined on the back face of each spray nozzle in line with the direction identifying indent.

After concurrence by Quality Control that the ma-chined groove was in true alignment with the identifying indent, the indent was removed mechanically.

The spray nozzles were cleaned prior to packaging in ac-cordance with the Test Requirement.

The water used for these cleaning purposes was taken from the NUS laboratory demineralized water supply of which periodic samples are drawn and tested.

Certifications of water analysis taken before and after the subject cleaning is shown in Figures 31 and 32.

3.5 Results Teot Runs 1 through 16 performed in accordance with General Slectric Test Requirement Bll-9, Revision 1, exhicited test results that showed several instrumented channels with flow less that of the minimum desired water flow.

Based on the results of these runs, it was concluded that the water flow pattern was sensitive to spray nozzle location.

At the direction of General Electric engineering a series of tests were performed in which several spray nozzles were interchanged, several spray nozzles were replaced, and some spray nozzle rotations were varied.

As a result of these tests a more satisfactory spray pattern was established and verified in Test Runs 59 through 65 and Test Runs 68 and 69.

3-8

Several of the test runs considered non-confirming are shown in Flow Distribution Chart form for Test Runs 49 and 50 in Figures 6 and 7.

Test Runs 66, a verification test run at 90 sparger orientation had one instrumented channel (Channel 12) exhibiting an abnormal low flow of water.

This condition is usually attributed to a leaking drain valve on the instrumented channel and the suspect drain valve on Channel 12 was cleaned and the tension on the valve spring was increased.

Two additional test runs (Test Runs 68 and 69) were run at the same test conditions as Test Run 66 and satisfactory results were obtained, fortifying the assumption that drain valve for Channel 12 was leaking slightly during Test Run 66.

A table of the total runs conducted during this Test Re-quirement is shown in Figures 4 and 5.

Four runs were conducted (Test Runs 70 through 73) in an effort to improve the several channels that were slightly below the design flow rate at the 270 orientation.

Since these test runs contributed no improvement to the flow rate the spray noz-zles were returned to their orientation during Test Run 64.

The spray nozzles were identified as to orientation prior to removal in ccordance with the procedure (Paragraph 3.4).

Two spray nozzles were sectioned in accordance with the Test Requirement and were given a Dye Penetrant Inspection.

The results of the inspection were negative and the Certi-fication of results is shown in Figures 33 through 36.

3-9

A Table of Test Run numbers of the final design configura-tion test is shown below.

TABLE 2 DESIGN CONFIGURATION TEST MATRIX OF TEST RUN NUMBERS Vessel Sparger Spargergrientgtion Steam Entry g

g Pressure Flcw 0

90 180 270 Condition (psig)

(gpm)

Combined 75 292 59 68 65 64 x

69 50 359 60 x

25 416 61 x

0-5 456 62 x

AIR 466 63 3-10

Flow data, in tabular form, and flow distribution printouts for the above Test Runs are shown in Figures 8 through 25.

A composite of the five test runs at a vessel pressure of 75 psig is shown in Figure 26.

The following channels received less than dcsign flow rate on an iriividual test run basis:

D E

8 A

C CHANNEL FLOW DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL 75 psig 50 psig 25 psig 0-5 psig AIR DESIGN A

1.71 2.0 B

1.84 2.0 C

1.71 1.72 1.9 D

1.58 1.6 E

1.94 2.0 3-11

The c.'annels receiving less than design flow at 75 psig on the basis of the composite diagram, as shown in Figure ';6, are as follows:

CHANNEL FLOW DISTRIBUTION Percent Channel 75 PSIG DESIGN Deviation A

1.71 2.0 14.5%

D 1.58 1.6 1.25%

A Table of spray nozzle serial numbers versus sparger position is shown in Figure 37.

This table also indicates the serial number of the spray nozzle which replaced the spray nozzle destructively inspected as per the Test Re-quirement.

J-12

9 9

)l i

,g

^

g f ~.,

9 g

1_

K,

'_ =

=

9

>s

[d

.%y,

'y'

,, j!

?

d c.

LE

.'._~

ZE 9

Z OR x

NU a

w T

w YX a,

' ~.

1AI RF L*Yf ;~>,.

s EP RST 9

k U

N u

GYE 5.. '

)

IRM a

2;

'^

4 FON TG AI mfr, %

RL

' N 7 ;'-

OA B

c 9

A C

L m

']

t

~.

&g n

p g

t V j $).

9 ql*

' f '

e L

p C;

e 9

k gtIL 9

9 uIH

9 9

Vls3 u

.\\'-

t..

~.

e a,

s x

r x

y

'}:f g

.p '1 e c N N

e x

y 9, \\(

s -

t s

C w:

.~

g-'

N g,-

c.

in,-

K y

Q C4 $

Wl,2 & :

l,

/),

~,;

2

\\-

d.i s

N

't" f

~;

,.9 I

k [

'li s !

w% mfe]

s ms<

.o q;-

o 2xm k h f.~6~Q

$k$

E3: -

?

F e$e4 ta*

q e $ij;_

@ j~

E u

4 "%[

W

2 8

e

]'s.l Q

~: 1

[i g

W&

,\\

~~~

2.-::. ~.+

3:::..~ 1,.;

A O

h g' ' I lfs

' Q(

w['

m t

'Q

'y J

v+

J',_;

j A

g.-

,1

\\

/

N.

MSy/ci.t e

3-14

O O

O 9

9 9

9 my.~ n l

}

-~.g.

I

.p

.E ApC.,,

l

.2

'l i;

/.

y

)

(

i l

i 4

'/.

1 u

l j:

.\\

t w

i j '.

'l

___ _f-j yc H

(

f_.

l r

'j t

._.dl}

.{

t l.

u.

2 i

N.

j'

.I.1 6

.v N,.

+:

_ yg

[4.

.l

~'

w w

j s,

+s : :

M b..

hI....

1

.~,some_ _ i n FIGURE 3 NUS ALIGNMENT LIGilT IN USE IN LABORATORY SPRAY NOZZLE ALIGNMENT FIXTURE

O O

O secu SE21AL stmasas TRIBUS SPAm23 705171Qu he lhament 1-4 kt6 L7 ta 19 2a u 22 23 34 23 to 27 23 29 34 31 32-37 38 39

e 41 63 SFaaCER Na17:cs e e11L1 stt&aL saea4a F3

17 27 27 af 17 If 17 27 17 17 27 17 17 27 17 17 17 27 27 17 17 37 1

33

1a 34 Sa 34 34 34 38 1s 34 38 38 34 14 Sa *S2 12 12 32 at 32 12 32 n

.n u a a a a = u a 12 a u = a a u o a a a a a e

31 se t at 69 69 at 69 at 69 at 69 49 69 49 69 69 49

+9 49 69 49 49 45 3

F6

3 3

3 3 93 3

3 3

9 F9 79 79 F9 79 ?? 79 79 79 79 79 79 ft 6

37 M 61 R 41 4 H n 44 g && n 64 *17 17

.F 37 af 37 37 37 37 7

7 ou 13 13 U L3 L3 L3 L3 L3 13 L3 L3 ene ne se 4

to 64 44 48 te se 4

L3 oft 9 F2 73 ft 72 972 F1

'70 7e 78 ele

- e

L3 13 13 16 13 13 L3 L3 L3 L3 9

33 eft 71 il TS 79 FS 79 78 78 78 73 is 78 78 78

.s 78 is 73 78 75 75 14 17 84F 47 af 67 67 63 +47 of 67 *te Le 18 19 la 10 18 la le le la la le u

4

F 97 7

F F

F 7

F F

F 7

7 7

7 7 t7 12 39

11 31 21 31 31 21 31 3 31 31 11 31 11 31 31 34 31 21

=e*

m 31 21 L3 4

TF 77 77 77 77 77 77 TF 77 77 TF T7 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 to 18

1 L

t 1

L 1

1 1

m3

1 1

L L

L3 10

4 8

8 8

8 4

4 8

8 8

0 *13 33

4 i6 77

?4 74 74 76 74 76 74 74 74 74 76 76 74 76 76 F6 76 74 74 74 76 F4 L7 e

6 6

e a e e e e a 4

e a

4 e a 6

4 et3 33 13 13 *a la 1

17 37 37 37 37 37 37 27 37 37 37 17 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 e

19 12

2 1

1 1

2 1

2 3

1 2

1 1

I I

2 2

1 3

- a 19 4F M

3 3 u u u LL M 3 u u u 3 L1 3 la u 3 u u u u u

=a 66 66 m na a+

aa 64

- u 64 en u **

64 ee 44

.4 u na 66 64

2 14

17 37 SF 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 SF M u u

9 9

9 9

9 23 L2

L4 14 to 14 14 L4 16 16 to 16 14 16 14 16 14 14 14 16 16 16 la 16 la u ** &

41 4 41 41 61 4 4 44 44 4 61 4 4 4 64 4

4 4 4 61 4 11

12 32 32 12 la 32 12 33 31 12 12 SS 22 32 *14 34 38 34 :s 34 !a !s 34 27

ee se se Se se as se se se se se et te se se 80 Se se as se 30 se 27

te 64 64 to 44 44 6a M 68 e4 64 64 64 44 68 64 64 to 64 44 M 48 IS 30

39 39 39 69 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 23 13 et3 13 a 13 13 13 23 13 13 23 S

3 13 23 13 13 23 13 II :3 13 13

0 64 ott 19 19 19 L9 LS 19 LS LS 19 19 19 19 19 L9 19 L9 19 19 13 19 19 3

64

18 20 :D 25 :S 29 2e 29 18 :S 29 29 29 23 S 23

s

S 28 :S :S s 32 69

13 13 13 13 13 33 33 33 33 33 39 13 13 13 13 33 33 33 33 13 33 13 33 Se

LS 13 13 13 L3 13 13 L3 L3 13 13 L3 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 36 22

Lt 12 12 u 12 L L3 L2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 23

3

18 Se 34 34 30 14 30 10 30 34 Se 34 20 Se 10 34

!4 30 10 13 30 34

a 11 all u u 11 3 11 u u u u u u 3 21 3 3 3

3 21 3 It 21 NN M 877A*I2 (180*)

ed airta:t::is (9e*)

.M son 7!se (.3*)

FIGURE 4 TABLE OF TEST RUNS (Page 1) 3-16

nat:L3 sta2ak maatas ensa EPA 521 P051T108 he hemma 43 u 48 ee 47*ea 34 31 32 33 34 sS Se nf 38 s9 m

67 as to 70 el 73 73 B o8SL8 813844 555884 m

g

!? If 37 27 27 27 37 17 37 27 17 17 17 17 27 27 27 27 17 33 37 27 17 3

32 32 33 13 12 33 33 32 13 32 33 -13 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 33 31 32 32 3

12 22 23 23 12 22 23 :2 22 u 22 22 22 It u

22 22

2 22 22 Ia u

Z2 4

9 49 a,

4, g,

.,g, 4,

4, 3 # II 79 79 79 79 79 89 9 79 79 art *13 23 13 23 33 33 33 13 33 33 33 33 33 4

37 II 37 37 37 37 *t?

37 =tf 37 "$7 37 37 SF 37 37 37 37

.7 37 37 37 37 7

6e te og as og e gg

.e.ee te to 6e 64, to se toe to se 6e to se as to to 8

L3 13 13 L3 13

- 3 12 *13 u 13 13 L3 13 13 13 L3 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 9

78 7s 73 73 73 7: 7s 73 73 78 78 78 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 74 73 73 7s Le 18 *10 la 18 le le le to le le 18 18 '98 71e 18 le is le is 18 18 le

10 g

7 "7

7 7

7 y

7 7

7 U

1 u J31 u 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 11 21 31 31 31

u "21 L3 77 n 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 n

n 77 77 77 n

n 77 i

14

1 1

1 l

1 1

1 1 1

1 1

81 I 1 1

1 L3 8 8 8

8 a

p 4

8 8

8 4

a e

3 3

8 0

0

3 4

e la 74 74 74 76 76 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 76 76 76 74 76 74 74 74 74 76 u

s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s

s s

la 37 77 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 27 17 37 19 2

2 3

3 3

1 2

1 1

2 2

1 2

3 2

2 2

za u u u u u a u u u u u u u u u u

u u

u a

a u *'.* u 42 a u 4.

- ** ** ** u u

a 22 9

9 9

s 9

9 9

u le 14 14 to 16 to 14 to 16 14 14 14 14 14 16 14 14 14 in 14 to 14 14 34

'I 4 4 4 41

&& 61 41 61 && 4 41 4 4 4'.

4 41 4

4 4

41 4

4 IS 38 $8 30 34 Sa SS 38 sa 34 34 38 34 Sa 34 34

!a 34 34 34 SS sa sa 34 a

se se se se as se se se se se se se se as se sa se se se se se se se 17 ta og to 64 ee 68 e4 68 e4 44 64 68 e4 65

'e 64 44 68 M

as ed es M

IS H 39 39 59 39 39 39 39 39 39 st 18 39 39 19 39 39 39 39 39 39 st 39

9 u u 13 u u u 13 u u 13 13 u u u u

3 u

u

3 13 u

u u

2e 19 19 Le is 13 19 19 L3 19 L9 19 19 19 L3 19 19 L9 Lp 19 L3 Lp 19 19 u

s :s za :s as ze :s 2

s as s :s :s :s zo 28

-s

s to as ze is

n 3:

u u 33 33 u 3: 33 13 33 33 u 33 33 33 u

u

3 "33 23 33 33 Ss 33 n u a u u u u u u u u u u u u u u

u u

u 3s u u u u u u u u u.u u u u a u u

u u

u a

u u

u

3 la se is se se se so Se 3e se se se se se se 3e se se So Se se se se a

u u a a u u u u a u a a u u 21 u

u u

u a

u e seam m sottrum (las")

= eat =.3 seTA21e (se")

.h nw ta3*)

Final nozzle position versus Sparger location verified by Qualicy Cc 1 trol.

f/)\\'. Downs

.2 = $= 71

.. spre, s.

1. s.rtal %. 21 (s,.rt.e 7s.1tsoa 36?

=a.

FR, J Date r='ed f ram this a*ss1* *.c aren Fue u.

73 rn destrwetiv. t. sting.

b. s,r, s. :1. sertal s. se c.,1

.a s

,3 3.,

3: 1, 39.r.e 7..intes a.

FIGURE 5 TABLE OF TEST RUNS (Page 2) 3-17

BIG ROCK FOINT CORE SFRAY TEST SPARGER RING SFRAY TEST C TEST 9 RUN 44 )

RUN NO.

C-1H-2-1 DATE 1/16/79 VESSEL FRESSUFE (FSIG) 75, TEMFERATURE CIEG F) 319 UATER FLOW (GFH)

292, TEMFERATUrd (IEG F) 67 NO771 F NO.

PATTERN-1H GRID LAYOUT (GFM) 2.69 X

X X

X 3.52 X

X X

X 2.66 3.48 3.32 X

X X

X 3.40 X

X 4.26 1.97 4.72 5.55 X

X X

X 3.26 3.95 3.04 4.21 2.70 X

X X

5.78 2.99 1.31 6.22 4.88 X

X X

5.21 X

1.76 3.00 5.53 7.26 X

X X

X 3.59 4.01 2.82 X

X X

X 4.02 Y

X X

X 3.49 X

X X

X 3.46 FIGURE 6 FLOW DISTRIBUTION CHART TEST 9 RUN 44 3-18

BIG ROCK FOItif CC1E SFRAY TEST SPARGER RING SFRAY TEST ( TEST 9 RUN 50 )

FitJN NO.

C-1H-1-1 DATE 1/26/79 UESSEL FRESSURE (PSIG) 75, TEMPEFMTURE (IEG F) 317 UATER FLOW (GFtD

292, TEMFEFMTURE (IEG F) 65 NOrZLE NO.

PATTERN-1H r

GRID LAYOUT (GFtD X

X X

5.01 X

X X

X 2.81 X

X X

3.09 X

X X

X 4.07 X

X 1.71 X

X 2.88 3.03 X

X X

7.86 2.55 5.61 6.05 X

X X

3.36 X

2.66 4.82 1.26 3.01 3.91 3.26 X

X X

3.77 2.21 2.56 4.28 1.22 2.73 X

4.07 2.73 4.58 5.42 2.30 5.53

No Data FIGURE 7 FLOW DISTRIBUTION CHART TEST 9 RUN 50 3-19

BIG ROCK FOINT CORE SFRAY TEST SPARGER RING SFRAY TEST ( lEST 9-Fo N 59 )

Rt.N NO.

C-1H--1-1 EuTE 2/07/79 UESSEL FRESSURE (PSIG) 75, TEMF1ERATURE (DEG F) 318

~

UATER FLOW (GEN)

292, TEMFERATUrE (IEG F) 63 NO771 F NO.

PA l' I t-RN-1H FLOW RATE DATA (GFM)

LEVEL CHANNEL A

B C

D AVG SEEV 1

2.71 3.02 3.02 3.19 2.99

.20 2

4.32 4.75 4.73 4.64 4.61

.20 3

6.47 6.47

-6.43 6.30 6.42

.O8 4

5.84 6.06 6.47 6.03 6.10

.26 5

4.16 5.16 4.55 4.82 4.67

.42 6

3.25 3.13 3.11 3.26 3.19

.08 7

4.97 4.97 5.05 4.64 4.91

.18 8

2.6O 2.74 2.33 2.43 2.53 18 9

1.99 2.11 2.15 2.37 2.16 16 10 3.86 4.16 3.94 4.38 4.08

.24 11 2.09 1.94 1.84 1.80 1.92

.13 12 1.91 1.82

1. 94 1.93 1.90

.O6 13 5.95 5.42 5.61 5.24 5.55

.30 14 1.83 2.08 2.31 1.95 2.04

.21 15 3.80 3.77 4.02 3.68 3.82

.14 16 3.29 3.41 3.31 3.41 3.25

.06 17 5.71 5.48 5.67 5.57 5.61

.10 18 2.42 2.53 2.60 2.43 2.50

.09 19 6.14 6.10 6.84 O.

6.36

.41 20 4.75 4.68 5.05 4.94 4.86

.17 21 2.90 3.24 2.99 3.29 3.10

.19 22 4.03 4.32 4.03 4.38 4.19

.19 23 364.65 420.54 428.18 O.

404.45 34.69 1A 24 O.

5.05 4.58 4.60 4.74

.27 2 A 25 O.

3.42 3.21 3.39 3.3+

.12

3 A 26 O.

O.

NA 4 A 27 O.

3.63 3.31 3.45 3.46

.16 5 A 28 O.

3.

3.92 4.01 3.92

.10 6A 29 O.

2.58 2.48 2.77 2.61

.14 7 A 30 O.

5.33 5.33 4.98 5.21

.21 8 A 31 O.

3.82 3.99 3.85 3.88

.09 9 A 32 O.

1.69 1.72 O.

1.71

.02 Uc data FIGURE 8 FLOW DATA TEST 9 RUN 59 3-20

BIG ROCK Fi] INT CORE SPRAY TEST SPARGER RING SPRAY TEST ( TEST 9 RUN 59 )

RUN NO.

C-1H-1-1 DATE 2/02/79 UESSEL FTRESSURE (FSIG) 75r TEMFERATUFE (IEG F) 318 UATER FLOW (GFM)

292, TEMFERATUFE (IEG F) 63 NO771 F-NO.

PATTERN-1H GRID LAYOLTT (GFN)

X X

X 4.74 X

X X

X 3.34 X'

X X

3.46 X

X X

X 3.92 X

X 2.61 X

X 4.67 2.99 X

X X

5.21 4.61 6.42 6.10 X

X X

2.88 X

1.71 5.55 2.16 3.19 4.91 2.53 X

X X

3.35 3.82 2.04 4.08 1.92 1.90 X

4.19 3.10 4.86 5.61 2.50 6.36

No Data FIGURE 9 FLOW DISTRIBUTION CHART TEST 9 RUN 59 3-21

BIG ROCK FOINT CORE SFfMY TEST SF%GER RING SPRAY TEST ( TEST 9'RUN 60 )

RUN NO.

C-1H-1-2 IwTE 2/02/79 UF W FfESSURE (FSIG) 47, TEMPERATURE (IEG F) 293 UATER FLOW (GFM) 359r TEMFERATULE (IEG F) 62 NO771 F NO.

PATTEFd+-1H FLOW RATE DATA (GFM)

LEVEL _

CHs^NNEL A

B C

D AVG SIEU 1

3.95 3.87 3.75 4.10 3.92

.15 2

4.59 3.71 4.48 4.80 4.40

.48 3

6.84 6.84 7.09 7.71 7.12

.41 4

7.71 8.17 8.46 8.46 8.20

.35 5

5.77 5.64 6.22 5.71 5.83

.26 6

4.48 4.17 4.46 4.42 4.39

.14 7

5.64 5.88 5.99 5.92 5.86

.15 8

3.72 3.38 3.44 3.14 3.42

.24 9

2.27 2.39 2.58 2.89 2.53

.27 10 4.82 4.66 4.68 4.44 4.65 16 11 2.55 2.45 2.47 2.30 2.44 11 12 2.19 '

2.17 2.37 2.47 2.30

.15 13 6.51 7.09 6.26 7.09 6.74

.42 14 2.49 2.35 2.25 2.52 2.41

.13 15 4.48 4.59 4.66 4.23 4.49

.19 16 4.21 4.19 4.10 4.29 4.20

.O7 17 6.39 6.06 6.18 6.14 6.19

.14 18 3.17 3.30 3.36 3.34 3.29

.O8 19 6.70 6.06 6.30 O.

6.35

.32 20 6.06 5.61 5.64 5.48 5.70

.25 21 3.11 3.01 3.11 3.37 3.15

.15 22 4.61 4.59 4.53 4.36 4.52

.11 23 434.77 491.48 513.82 0.

480.02 40.75 1A24 O.

4.02 4.02 4.41 4.15

.22 2A25 O.

4.29 4.76 3.88 4.31

.44

3A26 O.

O.

NA 4A27 O.

3.06 3.41 3.68 3.38

.32 5A28 O.

4.07 5.08 4.49 4.55

.51 6A29 O.

3.21 3.31 3.55 3.35 18 7A30 O.

6.44 6.44 6.39 6.42

.02 8A31 O.

4.18 4.22 4.20 4.20

.02 9A32 O.

1.60 1.71 1.85 1.72

.13 No data FIGURE 10 FLOW DATA TEST 9 RUN 60 3-22

BIG ROCN FOINT CORE SFRAY TEST SFTRGER RING SFRAY TEST ( TEST 9 RtJN 60 >

RUN NO.

C-1H--l-2 DATE 2/02/79 VESSEL FRESSURE (PSIG) 47, TEMPERATLhE (DEG F) 293 UATER FLOW (GFM)

359, TEMFERATURE (EEG F) 62 NOT71 F NO.

PA I i t.ht+-1H GRID LAYOUT (GFM)

X X

X 4.15 X

X X

X 4.31 X

X X

3.38 X

X X

X 4.55 X

X 3.35 X

X 5.83 3.92 X

X X

6.42 4.40 7.12' 8.20 X

X X

4.20 X

1.72 6.74 2.53 4.39 5.86 3.42 X

X X

4.20 4.49 2.41 4.65 2.44 2.30 X

4.52 3.15 5.70 6.19 3.29 6.35

No Data FIGURE 11 FLOW DISTRIBUTION CHART TEST 9 RUN 60 3-23

O BIG ROCK FCINT CORE SPRAY TEST SPARGER RING SPRAY TEST ( TEST 9 RLN 61 )

RUN NO.

C-1H-1-3 DATE 1/1/79 O

VESSEL PRESSURE (PSIG) 22r TEVPERATURE (EEG F) 262 UATER FLOW (GFtD

416, TEMFERATURE (EEG F) 62 NO771 F NO.

PATTERff-1H S

FLOW RATE DATA (GPM)

LEVLL CHANNEL A

B C

D AVG SEEV 9

1 4.29 4.55 4.46 4.42 4.43

.11 2

3.09 3.77 4.10 4.27 3.81

.52 3

7.09 6.65 6.79 6.34 6.72

.31 4

10.04 9.84 10.15 10.71 10.19

.37 5

6.84 6.34 6.60 6.84 6.66

.24 6

5.00 4.97 5.24 4.85 5.01

.17 0

7 7.71 6.26 7.53 6.70 7.05

.69 8

4.27 4.17 4.14 3.77 4.09

.22 9

2.84 3.27 3.89 3.68 3.42

.47 10 5.95 5.92 5.95 5.48 5.82

.23 11 3.29 3.27 3.58 2.69 3.21

.38 12 2.56 2.93 3.19 3.46 3.03

.38 O

13 7.71 7.71 7.97 8.03 7.86

.17 14 2.93 3.02 3.49 3.15 3.15

.25 15 5.39 5.54 5.54 5.67 5.54

.12 16 5.24 5.33 5.74 5.33 5.41

.22 17 7.09 6.60 6.79 6.79 6.82

.20 18 4.03 4.09 4.03 4.27 4.11

.11 g

19 6.34 6.56 6.14 O.

6.35

.21 20 6.10 5.39 5.74 5.18 5.60

.40 21 3.49 3.83 4.19 4.55 4.01

.46 22 3.72 3.65 3.65 4.09 3.78

.21 23 480.61 523.33 O.

O.

501.97 30.21 g

lA 24 O.

4.83 3.85 4.16 4.28

.50 2A 25 O.

4.39 5.36 5.03 4.93

.50

3A 26 O.

O.

NA 4A 27 O.

2.96 2.60 2.89 2.82

.19 5A 28 O.

5.68 5.78 5.71 5.72

.05 6A 29 O.

4.47 4.55 4.39 4.47

.08 e

7A 30 O.

7.31 7.31 7.43 7.35

.06 8A 31 O.

3.77 3.73 3.83 3.78

.05 9A 32 O.

2.43 2.57 2.89 2.63

.24 No data 9

FIGUPI 12 FLOW DATA TEST 9 RUN 61 0

3-24

O DIG ROCK POINT CORE SFFMY TEST O

SPARGER RING SFFMY TEST ( TEST 9 RUN 61 )

RUN NO.

C-1H-1-3 DATE 1/1/79 UESSEL PRESSURE (PSIG) 22r TEM:1ERATURE (DEG F) 262 O

WATER FLOW (GPM)

416, TEti:ERATURE (DEG F) 62 NO771F NO.

PATTERt+-1H GRID LAYOUT (GPM) g X

X X

4.28 X

X X

X 4.93 X

X X

S X

X X

X 2.82 X

X X

X O

X X

5.72 X

X 4.47 X

X 6.66 4.43 X

X X

X 0

X X

X 7.35 3.81 6.72 10.19 X

X X

3.78 X

2.63 7.86 3.42 5.01 7.05 4.09 X

X X

5.41 5.54 3.15 5.82 3.21 3.03 X

3.78 4.01 5.60 6.82 4.11 6.35 g

No data g

FIGURE 13 FLOW DISTRIBUTION CHART TEST 9 RUN 61 3 g

BIG ROCK FOINT CORE SFRAY TEST e

SPARGER RING SFRAY TEST ( TEST 9 RtN 62 )

RtN NO.

C-1H-1-4 DATE 2/2/79 VESSEL FRESSURE (PSIG) 4r TEMPERATURE (EEG F) 217 9

UATER FLOW (GPM) 456r TEMFERATURE (EEG F) 62 NOZZLE NO.

PATTERN-1H O

FLOW RATE DATA (GFtD LEVEL _

CHANNEL A

B C

D AUG SEEV 1

5.95 6.06 6.84 7.65 6.63

.79 g

2 4.32 4.10 4.02 3.80 4.06

.22 3

5.00 4.38 4.38 4.27 4.51

.33 4

9.01 8.17 8.85 7.78 8.45

.58 5

7.90 8.03 7.84 7.65 7.86

.16 6

5.45 5.95 5.88 5.84 5.78

.23 7

7.30 7.65 7.78 8.31 7.76

.42 9

8 3.28 3.30 3.28 O.

3.29

.01 9

4.42 3.72 3.21 2.82 3.54

.69 10 6.60 7.14 7.30 7.65 7.18

.44 11 5.54 4.68 4.12 3.80 4.53

.76 12 4.46 4.61 4.77 4.55 4.60

.13 13 7.36 6.89 7.47 7.90 7.41

.42 9

14 5.10 4.77 4.36 3.60 4.46

.65 15 6.56 5.92 5.81 5.51 5.95

.44 16 4.94 5.16 O.

O.

5.05

.15 17 6.30 6.06 6.18 6.39 6.23

.14 18 4.68 4.82 4.89 4.92 4.83

.11 19 5.67 5.36 5.30 O.

5.44

.20 0

20 4.16 4.44 4.92 5.42 4.73

.55 21 6.39 6.43 6.03 5.67 6.13

.35 22 4.00 4.03 4.03 3.87 3.99

.08 23 471.00 O.

O.

471.00 NA 1A 24 O.

4.58 4.62 4.51 4.57

.O5 2A 25 O.

4.90 5.42 5.78 5.37

.44 g

3A 26 O.

2.29 1.95 2.76 2.33

.41 4A 27 O.

2.26 1.95 2.76 2.32

.41 SA 28 O.

6.19 7.31 7.15 6.88

.61 6A 29 O.

6.44 4.23 3.77 4.81 1.42 7A 30-O.

7.85 7.85 9.75 8.48 1.10 g

8A 31 O.

2.40 2.18 2.08 2.22

.16 9A 32 O.

5.71 6.03 5.68 5.81

.20 FIGURE 14 O

FLOW DATA TEST 9 RUN 62 9

3-26

BIG ROCK FOINT CORE SFRAY TE5T SPARGER RING SFRAY TEST ( 1EST 9 FajN 62 )

RUN NO.

C-11+-1-4 DATE 2/2/79 UESSEL FEESSURE (PSIG) 4, TEMFERATURE (IEG F) 217 UATER FLOW (GFM)

456, TEMFERATURE (IEG F) 62 NOZ2LE NO.

PATTERN-1H GRID LAYOUT (GFH)

X X

X 4.57 X

X X

X 5.37 X

X X

2.33 X

X X

X 2.32 X

X X

X 6.88 X

X 4.81 X

X 7.86 6.63 X

X X

8.48 4.06 4.51 8.45 X

X X

2.22 X

5.81 7.41 3.54 5.78 7.76 3.29 X

X X

5.05 5.95 4.46 7.18 4.53 4.60 X

3.99 6.13 4.73 6.23 4.83 5.44 FIGURE 15 FLOW DISTRIBUTION CHART TEST 9 RUN 62 3-27

BIG ROCK FOINT COFE SFRAY TEST SPARGER RING SFRAY TEST ( lEST 9 RtJN 63 )

RUN NO.

C-1H-1-5 DATE 2/2/79 V F Rc:FI FRESSURE (PSIG)

Or TEMFERA11JRE (IEG F) 63 g

UATER FLOW (GFtD 466r TEM:ERATURE (DEG F) 63 NOZZLE NO.

PATTEF@f-1H e

FLOW RAIE DATA (GPM)

LEVEL CHANNEL A

B C

D AUG SLEV 1

4.64 4.70 4.53 4.36 4.56

.15 9

2 3.15 3.06 3.01 3.08 3.08

.06 3

3.65 3.77 3.75 3.80 3.74

.06 4

7.42 8.38 7.65 7.78 7.81

.41 5

4.92 4.97 5.07 5.07 5.01

.08 6

2.98 2.92 3.01 2.91 2.96

.05 7

6.26 6.47 6.43 6.43 6.40

.09 0

8 3.34 3.25 3.32 3.35 3.31

.05 9

3.49 3.61 3.57 3.46 i3.53

.07 10 5.99 5.99 6.06 6.10 6.04

.06 11 3.56 3.57 3.42 3.43 3.49

.08 12 3.52 3.43 3.56 3.49 3.50

.O5 13 5.24 5.24 5.57 5.61 5.41

.20 0

14 4.17 4.03 3.92 3.81 3.98

.16 15 6.03 6.03 5.88 O.

5.99

.08 16 4.17 4.10 4.23 3.98 4.12

.11 17 3.28 3.38 3.26 3.41 3.33

.07 18 3.77 3.75 3.58 3.67 3.69

.08 g

19 1.91 1.80 1.74 O.

1.82

.08 20 4.00 4.16 4.09 4.21 4.11

.09 21 4.02 3.98 3.95 3.81 3.94

.09 22 1.44

.70 O.

O.

1.07

.53 23 404.29 448.57 O.

O.

426.43 31.31 1A24 O.

1.43 1.32 1.24 1.33

.10 g

2A25 O.

5.45 5.39 5.36 5.40

.05

3A26 O.

O.

.88 NA 4A27 O.

1.12 1.07 1.04 1.08

.04 5A28 O.

5.82 5.89 5.68 5.79

.11 6A29 O.

4.22 4.13 4.18 4.17

.05 7A30 o,

7,43 7.43 7,43 7.43 NA g

8A31 O.

1.73 1.65 1.61 1.66

.06 9A32 O.

3.31 3.46 3.35 3.37

.08 b bD FIGURE 16 9

FLOW DATA TEST 9 RUN 63 3-28

O BIG ROCh, FOINT CORE SFRAY TEST SPARGER RING SFRAY TEST ( TEST 9 RUN 63 )

RUN NO.

C-1H-1-5 IATE 2/2/79 VESSEL FRESSURE (FSIG)

Or TE_M:ERATUE (DEG F) 63 WATER FLOW (GFti)

466, TEM:ERATURE (DEG F) 63 NnT71 F NO.

PATTE1W-1H GRID LAYOUT (GFti)

O X

X X

1.33 X

X X

X 5.40 X

X X

1.08 X

X X

X 5.79 X

X 4.17 X

X 5.01 4.56 X

X X

7.43 3.09 3.74 7.81 X

X X

1.66 y

3.37 5.41 3.53 2.96 6.40 3.31 X

X X

4.12 5.98 3.98 6.04 3.49 3. '~O X

1.07 3.94 4.11 3.33 3.69 1.82

No data FIGURE 17 FLOW DISTRIBUTION CHART TEST ?

RUN 63 3-29

BIG ROCK FOINT CCRE SF1RA'i lEST 4

SFWRGER RING SF1 RAY TEST ( TEST 9 Rt)N 64 ->

RtJN NO.

C-1H--2-1 EATE 3/2r/9 UESSEL F%1 ESSURE (FSIG) 75, TEMFERATURE (DEG F) 316 9

WATER FLOW (GFti)

292, TEMFERATURE (EEG F) 63 NO771 F NO.

PATTERN-1H O

FLOW RATE DATA (GFti)

LEVEL CW NNEL A

B C

D AUG SEEV 1

3.80 3.81 3.77 3.75 3.78

.03 2

5.54 5.45 5.51 5.48 5.49

.04 g

3 8.61 8.93 8.61 8.03 8.55

.37 4

6.43 7.20 8.38 6.79 7.20

.85 5

2.29 2.79 2.90 2.56 2.63

.27 6

1.69 1.69 1.60 1.84 1.71

.10 7

4.27 4.27 5.18 4.53 4.56

.43 g

8 2.76 2.84 3.05 2.84 2.87

.12 9

3.28 3.05 3.37 2.93 3.16

.20 10 1.90 1.89 1.79 1.81 1.84

.06 11 4.44 3.78 O.

O.

4.11

.47 12 2.72 2.82 2.90 2.82 2.81

.O7 13 4.61 4.03 4.68 4.34 4.42

.29 O

14 1.92 1.82 2.02 2.00 1.94

.09 15 3.36 3.02 3.07 2.79 3.06

.24 16 4.27 3.57 4.02 3.98 3.96

.29 17 7.30 7.36 7.30 7.71 7.42

.20 18 1.86 1.87 2.06 2.05 1.96

.11 19 5.51 5.45 4.57 O.

5.18

.53 0

20 5.54 5.57 5.54 6.06 5.68

.26 21 4.85 5.10 5.67 5.21 5.21

.35 22 2.17 2.07 2.07 2.48 2.20

.19 23 383.97 415.59 434.77 O.

411.44 25.65 1A 24 O.

1.89 2.01 2.18 2.03

.15 2A 25 O.

4.16 5.11 4.88 4.71

.49 g

3A 26 O.

O.

NA 4A 27 O.

5.78 5.78 5.39 5.65

.22 S A 28 O.

3.58 3.86 4.02 3.82

.23 6A 29 O.

3.47 3.27 3.21 3.32

.14 7A 30 O.

5.30 5.30 5.30 5.30 NA g

8 A 31 O.

3.88 3.70 3.50 3.69

.19 9A 32 O.

2.84 2.84 O.

2.84 NA No data FIGURE 18 9

FLOW DATA TEST 9 RUN 64 3-30

BIG ROCK FOINT COE SFRAY TCST SPt%GER RING SFRAY TEST

-( TEST 9 RtN 64 )

RtN NO.

C-1H-2-1 DATE 3/2/79 UESSEL FRESSUFE (PGIG) 75, TEMPERATLRE (IEG F) 316 UATER FLOW (GFM)

292, TEMF1ERATUIE (IEG F) 63 NO77IF NO.

PA 1 I t_FN--1H GRID LAYOlR (GFM) 3.69 X

X X

X 3.32 X

X X

X 2.20 3.96 2.84 X

X X

X 5.21 3.06 4.42 5.30 X

X X

X 5.68 1.94 3.16 5.49 2.63 X

X X

7.42 1.84 1.71 8.53 3.78 X

X X

4.71 X

1.96 4.11 4.56 7.20 X

X X

X 5.18 2.81 2.87 X

X X

X 2.03 X

X X

X 3.82 X

X X

X 5.65

No Data FIGURE 19 FLOW DISTRIBU'..' ION CHART TEST 9 RUN 64 3-31

BIG ROCK Ft] INT CORE SFfMY TEST SPARGER RING SFfMY TEST ( TEST 9 fan 65 7 RtN NO.

C-1H-3-1 DdTE 2/3/79 UESSEL FfESSURE (FSIG) 75, TEMFERATURE (DEG F).

318 UATER FLOW (GFti) 292r TEMFERATURE (EEG F) 65 NO771 F NO.

PATN1H FLOW RATE DATA (GFti)

LEVEL CHANNEL A

B C

D AVG SEEU 1

3.17 3.20 3.32 3.17 3.22

.07 2

6.03 5.92 5.18 5.67 5.70

.37 3

5.67 5.64 5.16 5.67 5.53

.25 4

3.05 3.00 3.02 2.94 3.00

.05 5

3.37 3.47 3.26 3.40 3.37

.09 6

3.97 4.27 3.56 3.78 3.89

.30 7

5.81 5.61 5.57 5.27 5.56

.22 8

3.37 3.53 3.30 3.31 3.38

.11 9

2.73 2.41 2.81 2.69 2.66

.17 10 3.94 3.64 3.94 3.75 3.82

.15 11 2.29 2.47 2.35 2.19 2.32

.11 12 1.57 1.63 1.53 O.

1.58

.05 13 6.26 6.84 7.25 6.39 6.68

.45 14 2.49 2.83 2.67 3.08

-2.77

.25 15 2.74 2.94 2.72 2.71 2.78

.11 16 2.52 2.52 2.66 3.03 2.69

.24 17 6.38 5.92 6.10 5.84 6.01

.16 18 2.13 2.16 2.38 2.12 2.20

.12 19 4.64 4.51 4.30 O.

4.48

.17 20 4.92 5.39 5.21 4.73 5.06

.29 21 2.27 2.25 2.24 2.17 2.23

.04 22 3.89 3.74 3.74 4.30 3.92

.27 23 376.80 415.59 441.56 O.

411.32 32.59 1A 24 O.

4.73 4.47 4.39 4.53

.18 2A 25 O.

4.13 3.92 4.35 4.13

.21

3 A 26 O.

O.

NA 4 A 27 O.

5.08 5.52 4.95 5.18

.30 SA 28 O.

3.22 3.15 3.54 3.30

.20 6 A 29 O.

2.41 2.42 2.65 2.49

.14 7A 30 O.

4.47 4.47 f.98 4.64

.29 8 A 31 O.

2.79 3.74 1.57 2.70 1.09 9A 32 O.

4.53 4.51 O.

4.54

.05 W

No data FIGURE 20 FLOW DATA TEST 9 RUN 65 3-32

e BIG ROCh FCINT CORE SF1MY TEST SPARGER RING SPRAY TEST ( TEST 9 RUN 65 )

RUN NO.

C-1H-3-1 DATE 2/3/79 VESSEL FEESSURE (PSIG) 75, TEMPERATURE (DEG F) 318 WATER FLOW (GPM)

292, TEMFERATURE (DEG F) 65 NO771 F NO.

PATERN--1H GRID LAYOUT (GFtD 4.48 2.20 6.01 5.06 2.23 3.92 X

1.58 2.32 3.82 2.7/

2.78 2.69 X

9 X

X 3.38 5.56 3.89 2.66 6.68 4.54 X

2.70 X

X X

3.00 5.53 5.70 4.64 X

X X

9 X

X X

X 3.22 3.37 X

X 2.49 X

X 3.30 X

X X

X 5.18 X

X X

4.13 X

X X

X 4.53 X

X X

No Data FIGURE 21 FLOW DISTRIBUTION CHART TEST 9 RUN 65 6

3-33

BIG ROCK POINT CORE SFfMY TEST SPARGER RING SFTmY TEST ( TEST 9 RON 68 )

RUN NO.

C-1H-4-1 IWri.' 2/5/7(?

UESSEL PRESSURE (PSIG) 75, TEMPERATURE (DEG F) 317 UATER FLOW (GPM)

292, TEMPERATURE (EEG F) 62 NO771F NO.

PAiit-HN-1H FLOW RATE DATA (GPM)

LEVEL Ct%NNEL A

B C

D AUG SEEV 1

3.68 4.03 3.60 3.54 3.71

.22 2

5.71 6.30 6.14 5.45 5.90

.39 3

7.04 6.18 6.26 6.47 6.49

.39 4

6.65 5.84 6.65 6.84 6.50

.44 5

3.71 3.94 3.94 3.89 3.87

.11 6

3.03 3.18 3.32 2.84 3.09

.21 7

5.57 4.51 4.61 5.33 5.00

.53 8

3.22 2.84 3.12 3.09 3.07

.17 9

3.07 2.92 2. 9'1 3.06 3.01

.O7 10 3.28 3.20 3.61 3.42 3.38

.18 11 2.32 2.44 2.63 2.78 2.54

.20 12 2.96 2.75 2.57 2.53 2.70

.20 13 5.61 5.71 5.51 5.24 5.52

.20 14 3.48 3.75 3.90 3.68 3.70

.18 15 2.44 2.67 2.79 2.96 2.71

.22 16 2.56 2.45 2.47 2.07 2.39

.22 17 6.56 6.18 6.70 6.34 6.44

.23 18 2.99 3.03 3.11 3.09 3.06

.05 19 2.80 3.31 3.30 O.

3.14

.29 20 6.18 5.54 5.77 5.88 5.84

.27 21 2.98 2.64 2.74 2.65 2.75

.16 22 3.13 3.31 3.09 3.30 3.21

.12 23 375.30 411.35 O.

O.

393.33 25.49 1A 24 O.

3.83 3.46 3.52 3.60

.20 2A 25 O.

2.87 2.90 3.31 3.03

.24

3A 26 O.

O.

NA 4A 27 O.

4.98 4.01 4.09 4.36

.54 SA 28 O.

3.55 3.23 3.25 3.34

.18 6A 29 O.

4.47 4.07 4.04 4.19

.24 7A 30 O.

4.80 4.80 4.58 4.73

.13 8A 31 O.

5.33 4.66 4.66 4.89

.39 9A 32 O.

2.37 2.04 O.

2.21

.23 No data FIGURE 22 FLOW DATA TEST 9 RUN 68 3-34

O BIG ROCK POINT CORE SFfdY TEST 9

SFMBER RING SFfMY TEST ( TEST 9 RUN 68 )

51)N NO.

C-1H 1 IWTE 2/5/79 UEen FRESSURE (PSIG) 75, TEMF1ERATURE (DEG F) 317 0

UATER FLOW (GFtD

292, TEMF1ERATUIME (EEG F) 62 NOZ7J_E NO.

PA I i Eld +-1H GRID LAYOUT (GFti) 4.36 X

X X

X 3.34 X

X X

X 9

3.60 X

X X

X 3.07 2.70 3.14 X

X X

X 6.50 5.00 2.54 3.06 4

X 3.03 X

X X

3.71 6.49 3.09 3.38 6.44 X

X X

3.87 5.90 3.01 3.70 5.84 e

X X

4.73 5.52 2.71 2.75 X

X X

X 2.21 2.39 3.21 0

X X

4.19 X

X X

X 4.89 No data FIGURE 23 FLOW DISTRIBUTION CHART TEST 9 RUN 68 0

3-35

BIG ROCK FOINT CORE SFRAY TEST SPARGER RING SFRAY TEST ( TEST 9 RUN 59 )

RUN NO.

C-1H-4-1 DATE 2/3/79 VESSEL FRESSURE (FSIG) 75r TEMFEFMTURE (IEG F) 317 UATER FLOW (GPM)

292, TEMFERATURE (IEG F) 62 NOZZLE NO.

PATTERN--1H FLOW RATE DATA (GFM)

LEVEL CHANNEL A

B C

D AUG SIEV 1

3.69 3.68 3.83 3.61 3.70

.09 2

6.14 5.74 6.26 5.88 6.01

.24 3

6.56 5.71 6.10 6.22 6.15

.35 4

6.22 6.89 6.74 6.06 6.48

.40 5

3.74 3.51 3.67 3.38 3.57

.16 6

3.27 3.14 3.40 2.98 3.20

.18 7

5.07 5.00 4.64 4.97 4.92

.19 8

3.36 3.26 3.48 2.93 3.26

.24 9

2.98 3.09 2.95 3.20 3.05

.12 10 3.18 2.73 3.18 3.16 3.06

.22 11 2.33 2.30 2.23 2.52 2. 3".,

12 12 2.88 2.86 3.15 3.08 2.99

.15 13 5.95 5.77 6.14 5.57 5.86

.24 14 3.80 3.8O 3.52 4.14 3.81

.25 15 2.44 2.33 2.32 2.75 2.46

.20 16 2.60 2.59 2.48 2.47 2.54

.O7 17 5.95 6.10 6.51 6.34 6.23

.25 18 2.99 2.96 3.00 3.26 3.05

.14 19 3.21 3.16 3.19 O.

3.19

.03 20 6.39 5.67 5.74 5.57 5.84

.37 21 3.67 3.20 3.26 3.10 3.31

.25 22 2.54 2.97 2.97 3.21 2.92

.28 23 357.72 421.16 O.

O.

389.44 44.86 1A 24 O.

4.18 3.49 4.01 3.89

.36 2A 25 O.

2.68 2.61 2.90 2.73

.15

3A 26 O.

O.

NA 4A 27 O.

4.14 4.55 3.79 4.16

.38 5A 28 O.

3.46 3.23 2.92 3.20

.27 6A 29 O.

3.73 3.96 4.33 4.00

.30 7A 30 O.

4.88 4.88 4.66 4.81

.12 8A 31 O.

4.83 4.04 3.92 4.26

.49 9A 32 O.

2.83 2.34 O.

2.60

.36

No data FIGURE 24 FLOW DATA TEST 9 RUN 69 3-36

BIG ROCA POINT CORE SFRAY TEST SPARGER RING SFRAY TEST ( TEST 9 RtJN 69 )

RUN NO.

C-1H-4-1 DATE 2/3/79 UESSEL FRESSUrE (PSIG) 75, TEMFERATUrE (EEG F) 317 UAT"cR FLOW (GPM)

292, TEMFERATUliE (EEG F) 62 NO771 F-NO.

PATTERN-1H GRID LAYOUT (GFti) 4.16 X

X X

X 3.20 X

X X

X 3.89 X

X X

X 3.26 2.99 3.19 X

X X

X 6.48 4.92 2.35 3.05 X

2.73 X

X X

3.70 6.15 3.20 3.06 6.23 X

X X

3.57 6.01 3.05 3.81 5.84 X

X X

X 4.81 5.86 2.46 3.31 X

X X

X 2.60 2.54 2.92 X

X X

X 4.00 X

X X

X 4.26 No data FIGURE 25 FLOW DISTRIBUTION CHART TEST 9 RUN 69 3-37

D. &a.t O. t O, h.TI

.....r...o,._...

....D.. -

.. - -..m TEST RUN 65 3.0 1.4 f.4 1.4 1.4 1.0 4.17 2.20 6.01 5.06 2.23 4.33 4

I I

2 4.6 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.58 2.32 3.42 3.05 2.78 2.69 I

I 4

2 1

1 1.0 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 B.6 B.0 3.23 3.96 3.11 5.56 3.89 2.66 S.68 3.62 2.84 3.12 3

3 2

I I

l 3

3 2

4 1.4 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 f.9 1.4 5.23 3.06 4.42 4.15 5.53 5.70 5.87 4.96 2.44 3.05 I

I i

2 I

I 3

2 2

2 TEST RUNS 1.4 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.4 64 5.68 2.56 3.16 5.49 2.92 3.59 6.32 3.14 3.21 6.33 68, 69 I

3 I

I 2

3 2

2 4

2 B.4 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.4 7.42 2.58 I.71 8.55 4.22 3.46 5.95 3.03 4.07 5.84 1

3 I

I 2

3 2

2 3

2 8.4 B.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.4 8.96 4.13 4.56 6.20 4.61 6.42 5.21 5.69 2.58 3.03 i

i I

2 I

i 3

2 2

2 1.0 6.6 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.0 4.74 2.83 2.29 5.55 2.16 3.19 4.91 2.44 2.46 2.72 3

1 2

I I

i 1

3 2

3 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.0 f.9 1.6 3.35 3.82 3.08 4.02 1.92 1.90 I

I 2

4 I

i 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.4 8.4 f.0 4.35 3J0 4.86 5.61 2.50 5.29 2

1 1

1 I

4 TEST RUN 59 "

FIGURE 26 CORE COOLING CONFIRMATION COMBINED TESTS AT 75 PSIG 3-38

9 4

e e

Section 3.6 Certifications and Inspection Reports 3-39

F or m No. CO-3 NU R ev. No.

O RECEIVING INSPECTION FORM W~HATON page consulting diwlelori June !$.1976 Page 1 Of 3

1. bab b C[

c-Supplier Shipping t.ist identification Vendor W/AFFwe T Yr7~/>91 Ce Attent R eje c1 P.O. No.

C". d". W Or/30/7 s

3. Shappeng list and purchase order Quanttties Irsted are in y

agreement and rece'ved material or component quantity verified to the purchase order list.

2. Verafication by visual ooservation that received I c~d'#W#C + d' material was nst darnaged duseng thsoment.

2#/~

3. Visual eaamination of material markings for acceptability to specified purchase order requirementt Heat and 1.st No. of receeved material

4. Chemical and mechanical testir:g results raceived witn shipment.

a.

Acceptability of che rrucal analysis to applicab4

/

s pecifica tion.

R ef. 5 pecificat ion per P. O.

b.

Acceptability of reported mechanical test values to appieCable specification.

R ef. specif scation per P. O.

c.

Special tests as required by purchase order.

S pe c.

S pec.

5. Dimensional inspection of received materiat or components per purchase order.

Width Lengt h Thicte ness FIGURE 27 RECEIVING INSPECTION REPORT PAGE 1 0F 3 3-40

CONDITION TEE DfDIVIDUAL STRAY N0ZZLES RIC11VED IN:

1.

D L3 28.

OK SS 54 OK LE 2.

13 ME 29.

ct sa 55.

SN SH 3.

$N M3 30.

$D L3 56.

CT. $3 4.

OK 31.

$N La 57 50 La 5.

$N MS 32.

OK SE 58.

SN M3 6.

$N S1 33.

D N sn 59.

M3 3R 7.

D LE 34 EN M3 60.

$N EB 8.

SD SH 35.

SD SM MH 61.

$D $N 9.

MN 36.

sw E3 62.

MD sa 10.

$N $a

. 37.

SD $N M3 63.

OK EB 11.

MN MB 38.

N $3 64 SD $8 12.

M3 M3 39.

SD M3 65.

$D SB 13.

35 ra 40.

D SN M3 66.

$N SR 14.

Sh $8 41.

$D $3 67.

SN MN 15.

D MB 42.

OK MH 68.

SD MB 16.

SN LS 43.

$D $3 69.

$N M3 17.

$N sa 44 sD 70.

sN sa 18.

N D SB 45.

D N SB 71.

SN SE 19.

$N MM 46.

OK $H 72.

CK SE 20.

$N MB 47.

Contaminaat Insiae 73.

$N MB 21.

5D FH Threads. Su 74 CK LH 22.

SN FE 48.

GK LB 75.

$D $N EB 23.

SD LM 49.

Black Marks. M3 76.

N $5 24 OK LB 50.

OK 77.

D $N FB 25.

$N MH 51.

SD $3 78.

OK M3 26.

SN SH 52.

OK 79.

$N $H 27.

OK LH 53.

SD Sn 80.

$N MB Key: D - Dented 55 - Small scratches

$N = $nall attka 3D - Semil d ents MN - Many nicks tM - t rie wones 11/24/78 su - s li wones For:n CD-3 to - Many dents Page 2 of 3 LE FIGURE 28 RECEIVING INSPECTION REPORT PAGE 2 OF 3 3-41

O O

Form No. CD 3 N

S RECElVING INSPECTION FORM NTIC]N (Continued) oate g

consultir eg divleion June 15.1976 Pa,.

3 os 3 NA Accept R eject 5.

Dia.1.D.

Dia. O.3.

O G eomet ry

6. Received material to be marked and identified as specifeed in purchase order.

m.

O a.

Verification by enspector of c3mpliance with item 6.

7. Supplier of received material b hsted on the approved

/

list of vendors.

8. Have all test reports. certification of conf er mance, ggvf Id special prot.ess approvals or other recuiternents h

listed en 1he ous chase oroer L'een seceived anc b ',

accepted by QA.

42d~fU# C G A? b dT/Wnd

9. Receiving inspection Disposition a.

Accept complete shipment Tag No.

b.

Hold f or release or rejectson Tag No.

O C.

Reject Tag No.

Nonconf ormance Report No g

Qualety Assurance inspector:

/[ [ \\',e Date:

//*2 !=78 1IGURE 29 RECEIVING INSPECTION REPORT PAGE 3 0F 3 3-42

O f'" + _ INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CORPORATION 33.,

S_

_3

}--

=3 P.O. on AvTn C L COLUWBUS DR. es 3)TM ST.

T AMPA. FLA. j)67) PM: $3))24blj))

ird(4,/e

...;tw - m,

.....-es,,,.

.:;7 Ck:tober 6. 1978 i

MUS Corporation 2536 tountry :1de 31vd.

Clearwater.1lcrida 33518 Attention P.r. Rodney Lawns Ref erenc e M 2 Dye

Dear.Pr. Lawns:

3rtis is to certify that the 80 pieces of 1/2 x 46 type 316 Stainlest Steel Mapples do cenform to A:3 A-312 welded. type 316 Stair.less Steel Nippl es.

Yery truly yours.

DCt:3IAL SLTFLT CCPICRA*1GN Charles E. Bradf ord P.Jiacer of Inventories Cz/nr

~i 'sf.

?. : f52if',CGT.E:'ji&~GE'C}9fpI-:j#..tT c. T i t-c FIGURE 30 CERTIFICATION OF MATERIAL STAINLESS STEEL PIPE NIPPLES 3-43

O O

II A I N E S TE S TI N G LABORATORT. I N C.

vs...

CL La*=aitst et OmiC A 3 3 520 v e s t.=o=L e. n es e e 18 8 8

. g, gggy g

O FOR:

Nts Corp.

Attn: A. A. Kartethenry 2536 Countryside 31ve Clearwater. T1orida 33515 a m :5:

gp,cg,)

SAM?!.T., M ARKING1:

N"5 sa=ples - 311-9-1 and 311-9 Becalved 10/26/78 LABCKATORY TINCINGS CONDUCTIVI*T CHLORICE Microshos /cm Milligrams / liter O

(Detection limit 0.05 mg/1)

Bil-9-1 0.i Negative 311-9-2 0.7 Negative O

O

/

HAIN W

TING LABCAATORT. Inc.

&/

l p

7 nm

.s m... m..

sh 9

O FIGURE 31 WATER ANALYSIS (SAlfLE NO. 1)

O 3-44

H AINES TE S TIN G L AB OR ATORT. IN C.

. a.. e n-e no-.o.o cus n. area receog sam REPORT NO.

47434 February 16, 1979 na o-a. iei m m.mi FOR:

NUS Corp.

Attn: Mr. Maxwell 2536 Countryside Blvd.

Clearwater, Florida 33515 ANAL 7515:

Special SAMPLF. MARKING 5:

Samples received 2/14/79 LABORATORY TINDINGS CCNDUCTIVITY CHI,0 RIDE Micromhos/cm Milligrams / liter 0250C.

(Detection limit 0.0$mg/1:

B 6 05 0.0 B 7 05 0.0 HAINES TESdG IA30 Inc.

/

\\

/,

f

<7mu h.O. Maine sgM D.

1r FIGURE 32 WATER ANALYSIS (SAMPLE No. 2) 3-45

PAdi NLMBER CATE

'NUS

-s 2-'-"

N TON PAR 1 DESCRIPTION

.$'tsas es Ma sars 2 o

=~a is MANUTACTURING PROCE55 5HEET F.ATERIAL TYPE HEAT NUf',8ER

"/s srs - sst srrn VENDOR P/M CR 3CEliTIFICATION APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS C.f.

wo. 8//-P l /-*o 0,4, spazyg WOAK DE5CRIPTION

,1, a,,rj ss e.

ro 2/'

ster"=. -,.... n... ).

INSPECTION DE 5 ULT 5 2.s

.,. x

..;..~ /

.. /

,f.../

.,. i.

L

./

t.:..

.: 2.. s.:.

'2/S--

av-

.,,r.

EEFERENCE5 y]$ POSIT 10N 3 ACCEPT EXPLAlk:

O R o ECT O cTNtR N< -

sv:

PhEFAAED 8!

OATE QuAtlit $55URAhci GAii hCAA FiRev4Mtu ci sit

/$l

-r-?j ft.I b -

Sir Qt b -

a - s-77 eru u.

FIGURE 33 SPRAY NOZZLE DYE PENETRANT INSPECTION (Page 1 of 41 3-46

P.s.

uid Penetrant (Perform)

C1astwater Oparattona ea s

2 12-5-78 FD(!"RAN* -TMSPECT7 0W ?DORT

~

Inspector

/

a tr J J Laval

__J Approved haterial:

Name Batch No.

Date a.

Clean.ing Salvant

.T#*reater y pp 4p j.//.79 b.

Tenetrant JPorexrer 7 RG 004 7-f r - 7 E L.

Developer Trn re are r 7syeJ

p. _=rs. 7p traject:
/90202
! art Number A/02 Z L f T 2/
Surf ace Preparation:
7ree and Dry of ' Extraneous hatter Grindins F e.r t ermed Test:
Penetrant Applic.ation I18' M'30 Zacess Fenetrant Esmoved Time /O*40 Lavalepar Applsed in Thin Coat Time For Raading
/O.*fo r = >-= m = tice ka sul t s :
A/O 2,,s r>*/'
8//fer o8
/N r t f Dcd r
Record of Repaired Artas and Results of Reinspection:
Part accepted W
2-o, art..,.....
c.C. ap, rov [ D 8. M-I eenom
~us erf==AvaviAu FIGURE 34 SPRAY NOZZLE DYE PENETRANT INSPECTION (Page 2 of 4) 3-47
Liquid Penetrant (Perforn)
I*
Clearwater Operations e
ea-o.-
3 12-5-78 Date:
2 - f
7f F N INSP!CTION M?CU Taspector
. a,>.r Level 1
Approved haterials
.Hame Batch No.
Cate n.
C1nanLas Solvent Treve per yry 4p a p j.,j. p b.
Reuetrant eps.re pe a gg og g
.,,,,,. yp c.
Developer ssosewrea 7j so4
,. ys. yp Pro 3ect:
190202 rar-nuncer s te2 z d
7/
Surf ase Fraparation:
Tree and Dry of Irtraneous Matter Grinding Performed Test:
a Penetrant Application Tim * /4~8 0 E.acess Fenetrant Removed Developer Applied in Thin Coat I1*e
//* *#
Time'7er Reading
//.*2 o T m '"ation 1esu1Ls:
A/O a s a ns efprer of s b eesco25 Record of 1spaired Areas and Results of Reinspettics:
O rart acceptee
? ' D -
O Pe-le2eet 4 o.C. Approva:
/ D; _
~uscc M nyws FIGURE 35 SPRAY NOZZLE DYE PENETRANT INSPECTION
( Page 3 of 4 )'
3-48
+NUS I CORPORATION LIQUID DYE PENETRANT INSPECTION CLIENT:
C.E. - Consumers PROJECT:
1402-02 WORK ORDER # 1902-900-76. Rev. O
SUBJECT:
BRP Soareer Production Nozzle Testine REQUIRDENTS :
G.E. #bil-9, Work Order #1902-900-76, Rev. O Procedure:
Nozzle #71 which was in the "as received" condition from the nozzle vendor was sectioned and inspected for linear indication through the use of liquid dye penetrant.
Nozzle #21 which was in Sparger position #36 was sectioned and inspected for linear indications through the use of liquid dye penetrant.
Findings:
Both nozzles were inspected and found to be free of any linear indications.
Inspected by e
Date 2-9-77 R. I. Downs, Q.C. Engineer Certified - NDE Liquid Penetrant FIGURE 36 SPRAY NOZZLE DYE PENETRANT INSPECTION (Page 4 of 4) 3-49
C ERT1 TIC ATION CLIENT: CE - Consumer s DATE: Tebruary 9,1979 PROJ ECT:
1902 - 02 WORK ORDER NO. - 1902-900-76 R cvision 0 SU BJ ECT: BRP 5 par ger Production Nossle Te sting RETEREN CE: General Electric Test Requirement BI).9 TITLE: NOZZLE SERIAL NUM BER VS SPARCER PCSITION NUM BER 5parger No zzle Sparger No azie Sparger Nessle Po sition Serial Po sition Se rial Po sition Se rial No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
1 27 13 77 25 58 2
52 14 1
26 80 3
22 15 8
27 68 4
49 16 74 28 59 5
33 17 6
29 25 6
57 18 37 30 19 lh 7
60 19 2
31 20 8
13 20 11 32 55 9
78 21 44 33 15 10 10 22 9
34 12 11 7
23 14 35 40 12 31 24 41 36 36
g
Replaced Nosale Serial Number 21 which was used for destructive t e sting.
1. The above table shows the nozzle serial numbe r s used in the final production nosale testing with the exception of Nozale Serial No. 36 which replaced Nossie Serial No. 21 used f or de structive te sting.
g
2. hA achined groove in all nozzles eweept Serial No. 36 indicate direction t.f orientation toward s vessel c enterline.
e trol A
Engine e ring G. T. Hums ston p R. Downs S
FIGURE 37 CERTIFICATION OF NOZZLE S
SERIAL NUMBERS VS SPARGER LOCATION FOR PRODUCTION SPRAY NOZZLES S
3-50
.

ML19282C626

Contents

Text

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Reference:

Dear.Pr. Lawns:

SUBJECT:

Navigation menu

ML19282C626

Text

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Reference:

Dear.Pr. Lawns:

SUBJECT:

Navigation menu

Search