ML19282B622
| ML19282B622 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 02/09/1979 |
| From: | Bell N AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19282B619 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7903160010 | |
| Download: ML19282B622 (4) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the matter of
)
)
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC
)
Docket No. 50-344 0 @ M, g al.
(Co. tool Building)
(Trojan Nuclear Plant)
)
CONSOLIDATED INTERVEDBS INTERROGATORIES TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF, DATED FEBRUARY 9; 1979.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2 740(b) Intervenors hereby request that the NRC Staff answer seperately and in w:riting, under oath or affirmation, the following interrogatories within fourteen (14) days of service.
Each question is instructed to be answered in six parts, as follows:
Answer to Question A) Provide the direct answer to the question.
B) Identify all documents and studies, and the particular parts thereof relied upon by the Staff as a basis for the answer.
C) Identify all documents and studies, and the particular parts thereof, examined byt not relied upon, which pertain to the subject matter questioned.
D) Identify by name, title and affiliation each employee or con-sulacant who has the expert knowledge required to support the answer to the question.
E) Explain whether the Staff is presently engaged in or intends to engage in any further research, analyses or work which may affect the answer.
Identify such research, analyses or work.
F) Identify the expert (s), if any, whom the Licensee intends to have testify on the subject matter questioned. State their qualificatinns.
79031600lo In the following questions, " modifications" refers ti the design modi-fications for the Tm jan control Building; " work" and " workers" refers to those who will be perfoming such modifleations.
- 1) What is the Staffs role in reviewing the modifications?
- 2) What is their role in reviewing the modification work?
- 3) How will modifications impact on plant operation?
- 4) What on-site inspection will be conducted by the Staff?
- 5) hho is responsible for sudt inspections? Provide qualifications.
- 6) hhat special training will workers undergo?
- 7) What evacuation plans will be provided for workers?
- 8) What areas subject to modification work are considered high-security?
- 9) What security measures will be taken for workers in high-security areas?
- 10) hhat additional security measures will be required in tems of both security personnel and physical security measures?
- 11) Will work be inspected?
- 12) If so, by whom? Provide qualifications.
- 13) Will the Staff review inspection documents?
- 14) What, if any, screening will be done in the employmente of workers?
- 15) Will workers be informed of potential health hazards from radiation?
- 16) Will workers be told of the risks and effects of nuclear accidnets?
- 17) What studies provide the basis for such information?
- 18) What preperatory work is completed for modifications?
- 19) hhat preperatory work is underway for modifications?
- 20) What review of the production and installation of the steel plate will be done by the Staff?
- 21) khat is the postulated effect of the drilling in the walls on adjacent or tangent cracks in the structure?
s
- 22) hhat equipment will be moved during the placement and installation of the steel plate?
- 23) Provide the location, function, safety category, safety train and relation to safety functions of such equipnent?
- 24) What existing structures will be removed?
- 25) bhat equignent will be used to raise / lower the plate (s) into position?
- 26) If a postulhted failure of such equipment were to occur, what would the effects be?
- 27) What was the original function of the 3" gap between the Control Building and the Turbine Building?
- 28) What effect will the insertion of the plate (s) have upon the dis-placement analysis.
- 29) What possible safety problems could be incurred by this?
- 30) What other construction is presently in progress at the Trojan site?
- 31) What is the material composing the ' protective blankets' mentioned in Section 5 311 of PGE-1920?
- 32) What are this blankets fire protection qualities?
- 33) Provide documentation to support this-
- 34) How vbil adequate fire protection access be provided during modifications?
- 35) What is the average turn-over rate for nuclear plant operators?
- 36) What is the average calary for nuclear plant operators?
- 37) Are there any Staff evaluations of P5E-1020?
- 38) If so, provide the evaluation or a description of same, how far it has progressed and any preliminary conclusions it has drawn.
- 39) What is the present status of WCAP 78-21?
- 40) Provide WCAP 78-21
- 41) Provide the Electrical, Instrumentation and Contool Systems Branch input into the acceptance of WCAP 78-21 Dated this day.
b M1 D ![!
the 9th of February,1979.
Jina Bell, cro a Consolidated Intervenors
J.S. NUC;E.-
DOCKETING ' -
C~
CF7:CE C.: -
~
Deemor.t S :.:r. 2 2
" sea
'd fCl v:de:d 34
- p
- -
' D ;;w..~
- % iq 8gi89pp r g.s
\\
.$f
-7 G\\
w UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
-P M
t.
I a %..
iG-Q c )Of
.p,A i -~:
C f.
-6 NUCLEAR REGULATORx COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
.' og
- In the matter of
)
)
?0RTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC
)
Docket No. 50-344 COMPANY, g al.
)
)
(Control Building)
(Trojan Nuclear Plant)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 9,1979, I served copies of the
" Consolidated Intervenors Interrogatories to Nuclear Regulatory Commi-ssion Staff, Dated February 9,1979" and " Consolidated Intervenors Interrogatories to Portland General Electric Company, Dated February 9,1979", by placing a true copy of each of said documents in a sealed envelppe with postage prepaid in the United Staes mail at Portland, Ore-gon addressed to:
Marshall E. Miller, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 Washington, D. C.
20555 Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom, Dean Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Division of Engineering, Board Architecture and Technology U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Oklahoma State University Washington, D. C.
20555 Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074 dr. Stephen M. Willingham Dr. Hugh C. Paxton 355 N. Temahawk Drive 1229 - 41s t Street pon land, Oregon 97217 Los Alamos, New Mexico 97544 Joseph R. Gray, Esq.
Robert Lowenstein, Esq.
Counsci for NRC Staff Lowens,tein, Newman, Reis & Axelrad U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 1214 Washington, D. C.
20555 1025 Connecticut Ave., N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Columbia County Courthouse Law Library H. H. Phillips, Esq.
Circuit Court Room St. Helens, Oregon 97051 Vice President, Corporate Counsel and Secretary Portland General Electric Company 121 S.W. Salmon Street Portland, Oregon 97204
I CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (Concluded)
Columbia Environmental Council John H. Socolofsky, Esq.
P. O. Box 611 Assistant Attorney General St. Helens, Oregon 97051 Of Attorneys for the State of Oregon 100 State Office Building Mr. John A. Kullberg Salem, Oregon 97310 Route 1, Box 250Q Sauvie Island, Oregon 97231 Mr. David B. McCoy 348 Hussey Lane Grants Pass, Oregon 97526 Hs. C. Gail Parson P. O. Box 2992 William Kinsey. Esq.
Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Bonneville Power Administration P. O. Box 3621 Docketing and Service Section Portland, Oregon 97208 Office of the Secretary U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555
/
/
/
Dated this day,
/\\/m a [3P the 9th of February,1979.
Mina Bell, pro s2 Consolidated Intervenors