ML19281B015

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-309/78-18
ML19281B015
Person / Time
Site: Maine Yankee
Issue date: 03/22/1979
From: Grier B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Groce R
Maine Yankee
Shared Package
ML19281B016 List:
References
NUDOCS 7904200149
Download: ML19281B015 (3)


See also: IR 05000309/1978018

Text

-

_

_

- -

_ -

--

_ m

TEAd

'

'

,

.

,

p* "*%

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISslON

yg

2

3 S' ( , o

nEcion i

f

5 '. ,

g

KING OF PRUSSI A. PENNSYLV ANI A 19406

$31 PARK AVENUE

.,9 -

.....

MM 2 21979

Docket No. 50-309

Maine Yankee Atcmic Power Company

ATTN: Mr. Robert H. Groce

Licensing Engineer

20 Turnpike Road

Westborough, Massachusetts 01581

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Inspeccion 50-309/78-18

This refers to your letter dated January 23, 1979, in response to our

letter dated December 28, 1978.

Thank you for infonning us of the corrective and preventive actions

documented in your letter. These actions will be examined during a

subsequent inspection of your licensed program.

We have reviewed che information you presented regarding Items B, D and

E and a previously identif ad item involving high radiation area control.

Our comments on these items follow:

1.

Item B: The facts presented in the inspection report and acknow-

ledged in your response clearly indicate a major portion of the

body could have been exposed to an intensity of radiation in excess

of 100 mr/hr in the unbarricaded area near degas filter FL33A.

In

addition, measurements made by our inspector and confirmed by your

representative indicate that a major portion of the body including

the gonads could have been exposed to a radiation intensity of

greater than 1000 mr/hr when in close proximity to this readily

accessible filter.

Application of the guidance referred to in your response as the "18

inen criterion" is limited to those situations where the gonads or

lens of the eyes could not receive a dose of more than 100 mr in

one hour.

There has been no change in the Office of Inspection and Enforce-

ment guidance on this matter.

79042001 %

.

-

_.--

_.

,

,

t

f

,

Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company 2

2.

Item D: We agree that had the individual adhered to Procedure 1-

12-4, adequate surveys would have been performed.

Since, the

individual did not adhere to the procedure, he assumed responsibility

imposed on licensee management to make or cause to be made surveys

as necessary for the protection of his health and safety and compli-

ance with regulatory requirements.

This responsibility is not

contingent upon the issuance of a Radiation Work Permit.

We do not

view the requirements of Technical Specifications and 10 CFR 20.201

to be redundant.

This item of noncompliance will not be withdrawn.

3.

Item E:

This apparenc item of noncompliance was issued for failure

to adhere to a procedure as required by your Technical Specifications.

Exposure received in excess of any pennissible limit established by

Section 2 of your Radiation Protection Manual is, in our opinion,

worthy of investigation in accordance with Section 4.11 of your

manual and is consistent with good radiation safety practices.

Based on the additional information provided in your response, we

understand the phrase " permissible limits" to apply only to Section

2.3, " Maximum Permissible Exposure (Regulatory Limits)."

This apparent item of noncompliance is withdrawn.

4.

Additional Item:

Paragraph 2 of Inspection Report 50-309/78-18

acknowledged that your corrective action for the three instances of

noncompliance was adequate.

The same paragraph states that the

generic administrative actions to prevent recurrence of this type

of noncompliance were not adequately implemented in that an additional

item of noncompliance (Item B) was identified during the inspection.

The point we are making is that while the corrective action for the

specific items was adequate, the action to prevent recurrence of

similar items does not appear to have been effective.

If you have further comments or questions on these matters we would be

pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

-

Boyce H. Grier

Director

...

.

_

.

_. _. _

.

.

_

.

-_

,

.

1

I

Maine Yankee Atomic Power

Company

3

I

cc:

E. Wood, Plant Superintendent

E. W. Thurlow. President