ML19276G808

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Documents Re Application to Transfer Southern CA Edison Co Ownership Interest to Cities of Anaheim & Riverside,Ca.Requests Comments for Antitrust Review.W/O Encl
ML19276G808
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 08/03/1979
From: Shapar H
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Bell G, Kaplan D
JUSTICE, DEPT. OF, JUSTICE, DEPT. OF, ATTORNEY GENERAL, OFFICE OF
References
NUDOCS 7908270543
Download: ML19276G808 (1)


Text

}D),p

/ p anc,

o UfJIT ED STATES g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y'

g W ASWNG TON, D. C. 20055 l

%*ese*/

AUG t m

The lionorable Griffin B. Bell Attorney General Washington, D.C.

Attention: Donald A. Kaplan, Chief Energy Section Antitrust Division Department o.f Justice Re:

Southern California Edison Company San Diego Gas & Electric Company San Onofre fiuclear Generating Station Units 2 & 3, Docket flos. 50-361A & 50-362A_

Dear fir. Attorney General:

In accordance with Section 105(c) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, we are transmitting herewith two copies of the "Information Requested by the Attorney General for Antitrust Review" submitted by the Southern California Edison Company on behalf of the Cities of Anaheim and Rivarside California.

This information appears as Appendix E (Riverside) and Appendix H (Anaheim) to Southern California Edison Company's " Application for Permission to Transfer an Ownership Interest to the Cities of Anaheim and Riverside, California and for Amendment to Construction Permits flos. CPPR-97 and CPPR-98."

Under the proposed transfer of ownership, the City of Anaheim would acquire a 1.66% interest in each of the two 1100 ifd(e) units, for a total of 36.52 Kd(e),

and the City of Riverside would acquire a 1.79% interest in each of the two units, for a total of 39.38 ffd(e). Under the "de minimis" rule, therefore, each city is required to submit only the information requested in item 9 of Appendix L to 10 CFR-Part 50 tiotwithstanding the "de minimis" rule, however, both cities chose to submit all of the information requested in Appendix L.

The informatic1 has now been accepted for the purpose of initiating the anti-trust review.

The material is being transmitted to afford you an oppc,. tunity to render such advice to the Commission as you determine to be appropriate in regard to the finding to be made by the Commission pursuant to Section 105(c)

(5) of the Act.

Sincerely, l/

hb..S w,

Howard K. Sha ar

q Executive Legal Director j

As stated 79082705f5

-