ML19275A970
| ML19275A970 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 02/04/1974 |
| From: | Schwencer A US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | John Miller METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911040202 | |
| Download: ML19275A970 (2) | |
Text
s DISTRIBUTION:
AE PDR WButler L cal PDR JStolz ocket ASchwencer FEB 4 G4 LWR 2-3 Rdg TR AD's Docket No. 50-289 VAMoore 5 extra cps JHendrie QQ// meg AKenneke DEisenhut Metropolitan Edison Company ATIN: Mr. John C. Miller 0
Vice President R0 (3)
.O.En M2 g
,g Reading, Peansylvania 19603 EIGoulbourne ACRS (16)
Centlemen:
1 e
On January 21, 1974 yousubmittedbylettercopiN"8f"fd8rproposed Operating Quality Assurance Plan for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1.
We had the opportunity to review a previous draft of this plan and havs now complete *. our review of this later revision. Your proposed Operating Quality Assurance Plan is acceptable provided that you incorporate the changes defined in the enclosure to this letter and file the revised Plan as an amendment to your application by March 1, 1974.
In addition to having the Plan on file, you will be required to implement your Operating Quality Assurance Program before an opedating license is issued for Three Mile Island Unit 1.
Sincerely, drtgfnalSigoed by Albert Schwence A. Schwencer, Chief Light Water Reactors Br. No. 2-3 Directorate of Licensing
Enclosure:
Changes re Operating Quality Assurance P1:n ec: Mr. George F. Trowbridge, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 910 17th Street, NW Washington, D. C.
20006
_,j L
2 L:C LWR 2-3 o r,,c s,
RV Ilmer-a v a~ ~ =
- RMBernero:kmf
-ASc neer.-
1/ L _./74 y
_ f74 -1/-g./74 o n.-
Form AEC 3tn (Rev. 9 53) AECM 0240 e*o c.a se e s.e s.
s ao.a..
7911040MC)2 g
m H
Thre "ile Is 1: O "ni-
! Onera 4 an2'
"'Ti t.- J.s s t rrc a
~i - Metropolitaa Edison Cac7any C.::d; cLates
_n L 3 Q.-
?;o r r;m.
2scription 2.
"ea an indis cual casa a sis, the "aaa;cr-Genera tion can arrceg 2.Lth olhar or;1ainations, such as G.L Service Corparation, for ssistence in Jupaur; of the Metropolitan Edison Company quality Assurance Progrea; ir such cases, he is responsible for assuring that these organizations have suitable Quality Assurance Programs for the work they parform, as further discussed in Sectica VII".
Section VII of Me:Ed's program describes vendor selection, vendor surveillance, receipt inspection, and receiving est ina 7ec t ion activities.
"etEd has not identified a position within its organization with the assigned responsibility for the review of and concurrence with QA Program (s) developed 3rd/or implemented for them by other organizations, including GFC Service Corporation (GPUSC).
- either has "etEd stated tha; periodic cudits will be conducted of the implementation of the QA program activities delegated ta CPUSC and other major organizations / contractors.
Critarion 1 of Appendix 5 to 10 CFR 50 s tates, "Ehe applicant may delegete to other organizations the work of cstablishing and executing the Quality As surance Program, or any part thereof, but shall retain responsibility therefore".
It is our position that to retain responsibility for delegated portions of the QA Program, Meted musc:
(a)
Identify a position within its organization, filled by a qualified individual, to review and cencur with the QA Program (s) of those organizations, including GPUSC, delezated QA Program responsibilities by Meted.
(5)
Fariodically audit the implementation of the delegated portions of the QA Program being performed by other organizaticas, including GPUSC.
2.
Meted has not committed to the guidance presented in the "Gui. dance on quality A> urance Requirements During the Operations Phase of ';uclear Power Plan:;",
dated October 26, 1973 (0 range acok).
It is our position that Meted cust:
fa) Commi t to the Onplementation of the guidance contained in the "Crange Look", or (b)
Identify any exceptions and describe accepta: le ai:ernac23.
a 0
.i N6 seu N
s
,,9 6
' g\\p4.p
. d\\\\N'\\
_