ML19275A604
| ML19275A604 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Black Fox |
| Issue date: | 08/06/1979 |
| From: | Barlow E SUNBELT ALLIANCE, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK |
| To: | Wolfe S Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910050759 | |
| Download: ML19275A604 (1) | |
Text
.
DOCKET NUME3 FRGD. & UT!L. FAC. f0-MC, Sg August 6, 1979 kl 4
"r. Sheldon J. '?olfe Ato=ic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
- fp United States 'Iuclear Regulatorv Co==ission
~
W"* % l$ph f
Washingtcn, D.C.
20535
--V:
Dear Mr. Wolfe,
y v
It is the understanding of the Sunbelt Alliance that the AS&LB Hearing regarding the Blach Fox Station vill be re-opening in the future. "'here-fore, the Sunbelt Alliance formally petitions the AS&LB to grant the following requests...
First, to pernit limited appearence statements on the part of the public.
Although =any Ohlahe=ans have previcus!.y caf e such an appearance, the Three Mile Island accident has substantially altered the context of arv opinions previously expressed. Additionally, many persons who had no concrete opinions concerning 3 lack Fox befcre the ""'!I accident cv bear specific oi-jecticns to the construction of Black Fox.
Secon-My, to crder a full and open nublic disclosure cf ti.e Reed Report.
L'e arc both a arc that the "public interest" is nerely an apparition of I
process unless the government releases all pertinent informatior as it affects the pu lic health and safcty. That the federa] governs:nt, through its agency, t e ASLLL, uculd participate in the suppression of this crit-ical docunant whic' bears such lethal significance to the people of Okla-hoca
's a horrifying affront to ary concept of liberry.
Finally, we demand that all sessions of the hearings be conducted in the
" suns'ine'. "o governncnt that deliberates matters of public safet:- in secrecy can represent the public's interest.
One last iten. Public Service Co. has announced that they ar rr: ques ting that t'ese hearings be re-opened. Si= ply, since PSO tade that anrouncement on Thursday, Aug. 2,did the h"iC decision to re-open the hearings prr.ceed PSO's request? Or,1f : at decisim is no ; et formally issued, t.ns the
"?.C's consideration of re-opening those hearings initiated substantially before t..
PSO announcement? '.ie would appreciate any supporting docunent-ation of her the decision to re-cpen those bearings uns made (or.<ill be cade).
Yours, or the aholition of all nuclear eenaces,
':t2'
/
[
Mb#
D D
O Elica?et' 7a m 3arlo". Staffperson CJ W Stab;1: 'J11anc _
Q 9~l l
D 133/ 2. 3 S t.
l Tulsa, 1 lancna 7i126
.9
_ j(1 f i
a (910) 3-^
^'332 1910050 6-y
,j;y
/-.,.
f r'
-