ML19274E621

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 790116-19
ML19274E621
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/14/1979
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML19274E614 List:
References
50-324-79-04, 50-324-79-4, 50-325-79-03, 50-325-79-3, NUDOCS 7904090274
Download: ML19274E621 (1)


Text

,

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Company License No. DPR-62 Brunswick Steam Electric Plant DPR-71 Units 1 and 2 Based on the NRC inspection January 16-19, 1979, certain of your activities were apparently not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as indicated below. These items have been categorized as described in corre-spondence to you dated December 31, 1974.

A.

As required by Technical Specification 6.5.1.6. A, the Plant Nuclear Safety Committee (PNSC) is responsible for reviewing the written procedures required by Specification 6.8.

Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires that the applicable procedures of Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33, November 1972 shall be established. Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix "A," Section H.2.b(5) lists surveillance test procedures for the standby gas treatment system tests including filter tests.

Contrary to the above, the PNSC did not review the contractor's proce-dure for performing the surveillance tests of the standby gas treatment system filters and adsorbers prior to the performance of the tests in October 1978.

This is an inf raction.

B.

As required by 10 CFR 20.205(a)(4), the licensee is required to make a written report to the NRC within 30 days for any incident for which notification was required by 10 CFR 20.403.

10 CFR 20.403(b)(1) requires that the licensee shall notify the NRC of any incident which may have caused or threatens to cause an exposure to the whole body of 5 Rems or more.

On November 30, 1978, the licensee notified NRC, Region II by telephone and facsimile of an incident which may have caused an exposure to the whole t ady in excess of 5 Rems to an individual as determined by the licensee or that date.

Contrary to the above, the licensee did not submit the written report required by 10 CFR 20.405(a)(4) within the required 30 days.

The written report was submitted on January 5, 1979, 37 days following the incident.

This is a deficiency.

7 9 0 4 0 9 0 2 Ti