ML19270G252

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-352/78-12 & 50-353/78-08
ML19270G252
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  
Issue date: 04/23/1979
From: Robert Carlson
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Boyer V
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
Shared Package
ML19270G253 List:
References
NUDOCS 7906050193
Download: ML19270G252 (1)


See also: IR 05000352/1978012

Text

'T'%

sg

,

'

w

,.g

- , . v . .

_

_

-

,

" "'*%

UNIT ~D STATES

'

4

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

e

E

o

REGION I

E '.

431 PARK AVENUE ps -

  • '

'

KING OF PRUSSIA. PENNSYLVANIA 19406

.....

Docket No. 50-352

MR 2 31979

s

Philadelphia Electric Company

ATTN: Mr. V. S. Boyer

Vice President

Engineering and Research

2301 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19101

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Inspection 50-352/78-12

This refers to your letter dated March 2,1979, in response to our

letter dated January 31, 1979.

Thank you for informing us of the corrective and preventive actions

documented in the response portion of your letter.

These actions will

be examined during a subsequent inspection of your licensed program.

Your letter requested that this item of noncompliance be reclassified as

an unrasolved item since the Quality Control Instructions on the Limerick

project are designed to identify missed inspections or hold points. You

indicated that subsequent reviews would have identified the condition.

The Office of Inspection and Enforcement Inspection Report 50-352/78-12

noted in Paragraph 9 that the missed inspection hold points included

some inspection requirements which were no longer feasible to perform

adequately because of work which had proceeded.

Subsequent identification

by your program could not adequately compensate for the original omission

of such inspections. We also note that consent had not been given

either by the code authorized inspector or by the Bechtel QC inspector

to waive the designated hold points. Therefore, reclassification of the

item of noncompliance would not be appropriate.

Sincerely.

-

m

4

Robert T. Carlson, Chief

Reactor Construction and Engineering

Support Branch

1906050\\