ML19269E860
| ML19269E860 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yankee Rowe |
| Issue date: | 05/16/1979 |
| From: | Moody D YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Grier B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| WYR-79-57, NUDOCS 7906290737 | |
| Download: ML19269E860 (2) | |
Text
h
- ~
IM$li Telephone 617 366-90ll rwx 710-390-0739 YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY s.a.1.1
- ^=
WYR 79-57 g,
20 Turnpike Road Westborough, Massachusetts 01581
, YANKEE
~
May 16, 1979 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Attention: Office of Inspection and Enforcement Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director
Reference:
(a) License No. DPR-3 (Docket 50-29)
(b) 1 & E letter to YAEC dated April 14, 1979 (I & E Bulletin No.79-06A)
(c) I & E letter to YAEC dated April 18, 1979 (I & E Bulletin No.79-06A, Rev. 1)
(d) YAEC letter to I & E dated April 26, 1979
Dear Sir:
Subject:
Additional response to I & E Bulletin 79-06A Item 13 of reference (b) requested that The Yankee Atomic Electric Company propose changes to those technical specifications which would require modification as a result of the implementation of items 1 thru 12 of the referenced Bulletin.
Reference (c) describes those actions taken by The Yankee Atomic Electric Company in response to the Bulletin.
It is the opinion of the Yankee Atomic Electric Company that none of the actions taken will require modifications to current technical specifications and therefore, no proposed changes to the specifications are being submitted at this time.
Additionally, the modified Item 13 of reference (c) requested that Yankee also identify design changes necessary in order to effect long term resolutions of the items in reference (b).
It has been determined during our reviews of reference (b) that the existing plant design is adequate and allows enough flexibility to meet the concerns expressed.
2142 061 7906290737 O
. - _'. - a United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 May 16, 1979 Certain modifications which would Parther enhance plant flexibility and redundancy are being studied at this time for long term implementation but design and requirements have not been sufficiently formulated to discuss at this time. We will be glad to discuas any such modifications with your staff if, after proper review they are deemed desirable and beneficial above and beyond the existing Yankee Rowe design.
Very truly yours, YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY j
D. E. Mood Manager of Operations JKT/dep 2142 062