ML19269E136
| ML19269E136 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 05/24/1979 |
| From: | Finfrock I JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Grier B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7906260567 | |
| Download: ML19269E136 (3) | |
Text
YW
&I)
Jersey Central Power & Light Company l
Madison Avenue at Punch Bowt Road Morristown, New Jersey 07960 (201)455-8200 May 24, 1979 Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
Dear Mr. Grier:
Subject:
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 IE Bulletin No. 79-10 The purpose of this letter is to forward to you the statistical Information, regarding the operator requalification training program at the Oyster Creek Station, that is requested in IE Bulletin No. 79-10.
As per instruction given in Action item 6 of the bulletin, the information for Action items 1 through 5 is recorded in Table 1.
TABLE 1 Operators Senior Operators Exam Exam Exam Exam Exam Exam Exam Exam 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1.
Action 1:
Responses A.
Total number failed annual examination 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 B.
Percent that failed annual examination 0
0 0
0
,0 0
0 0
2.
Action 2:
Responses A.
Percent required to attend additional lectures 36 100 45 38 42 73 47 25 B.
Number of operators attending specified number of lectures (number of operators /
number of lectures) 4/40 16/332 8/78 5/53 5/59 11/63 8/97 4/40 2131 276 790828o T6 7 g,
Jersey Central Power & Lignt Company is a Member of the General Public Utilit:es System
IE Builetin No. 79-10 May 24, 1979 TABLE 1 (Continued)
Operators Senior Operators Exam Exam Exam Exam Exam Exam Exam Exam 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 3
Action 3:
Responses A.
Total nemoer attending accelerated training because <70 percent on annual written exam-ination 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 8.
Percent attending accelerated training lesson because <70 percent on annual written examination 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 C.
Tctal number attending accelerated training because unsatisfactory oral examination 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 D.
Percent attending accelerated training because unsatisfactory oral examinatica 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Date of Exam 1:
1975 2:
1976 3:
1977 4:
1978 Although not specifically requested, additional information is recorded in Table 2 to provide a further breakdown of the statistics given in the responses to Action item 2, and should aid in the evaluation of the Oyster Creek program.
TABLE 2 OP - Number of operators scoring <80% in a particular section of written exam.
LEC - Number of lectures given pertaining to a section where deficiencies were revealed.
IE Bulletin No. 79-10 May 24, 1979 TABLE 2 (Continued)
Exam Exam 1*
Exam 2 Exam 3 Exam 4 Section OP LEC OP LEC OP LEC OP LEC A
1 10 12 6
3 7
1 7
B 0
N/A 4
27 2
10 0
N/A C
1 2
10 6
0 N/A 2
4 D
0 N/A 4
2 2
3 2
4 E
3 5
7 9
1 7
I 9
F 3
6 6
1 1
8 3
7 G
3 8
5 1
2 8
0 N/A Y
3 10 8
5 0
N/A 2
8 1
0 N/A 3
1 5
8 0
N/A J
0 N/A 2
5 3
8 0
N/A K
0 N/A 4
2 3
5 1
2 L
0 N/A 1
12 2
7 3
17
- SRO's took all sections of Exam 1 and are included with RO's data for that year only.
Exam 1:
1975 2:
1976 3:
1977 4:
1978 Very truly yours,
-l Ouv u
Ivan R. Finfrock, J.
Vice Presidenf cs cc:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of Project Management Operator Licensing Branch Washington, DC 20555 J
2131 278