ML19269D175

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
In Response to NRC 790206 Request,Forwards Spent Fuel Cask Drop Analysis of NSF-4 truck-type Cask.Examines Three Possible Cases of Dropping or Tipping
ML19269D175
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire, McGuire, 07002623  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/1979
From: Parker W
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Baer R, Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7903070232
Download: ML19269D175 (7)


Text

..

DUKE POWER COMI%NY PownaIlcimixo 422 Sourni Citrucir SinEET, Cil AHl.OTTE, N. C. 2fC.R WILLI AM O. PA R M E R J R.

March 2, 1979

'/tc r PRES O FN Y TEL Ep=CN E: AG E A 704 S f E A nd PRODvCTroN 373-4083 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Attention:

Mr. Robert L. Baer, Chief Light Water Reactors Branch 2

Reference:

McGuire Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370, 70-2623

Dear Mr. Denton:

As requested by Mr. Baer's February 6, 1979 letter, please find attached the McGuire spent fuel cask drop analysis using the Oconee (NSF-4 truck type) cask.

The Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards is also being provided a copy of this letter and attachments since the subject matter is pertinent to the pending amendment request presently being considered on Docket No. 70-2623.

Very/ ruly yours, t

i l l

wO lb. ~

L' William O. Parker, Jr.

GJP:scs Attachment cc:

Mr. William J. Dircks, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission Washington, D. C.

20555 kPRoGa

/

\\

th Anniversary 7003070 A.3%

%o%, #*#

D

McGuire Nuclear Station Cask Drop Analysis Response to NRC Letter of February 6, 1979 Pursuant to your request by letter of February 6,1979, we submit the following information concerning our analysis evaluating the consequences of dropping or tipping, or a combination of both, of the Oconee fuel cask in the McGuire spent fuel handling building.

The Oconee fuel ca:.4 is a truck cask licensed by Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.

and is Model No. NFS-4. The cask weighs approximately 25 tons and is 214 inches long including top and bottom energy absorbers. The area in which the cask is handled is designed for a 30 foot drop of a proposed 100 ton rail cask and the structure is reinforced concrete with a rock foundation.

Local damage to the concrete will be negligible and no safety related equipment is located in the cask travel path. No special equipment is required to handle the Oconee fuel cask since cask hoisting equipment at McGuire is similiar to Oconee.

The following circumstances of dropping the cask were considered to be most critical and the assumptions and conclusions are presented:

Case #1 - The cask handling crane is assumed to be traveling at its maximum speed of 50 fpm and hits the crane stops nearest the spent fuel pool. The crane stops,and the cask is assumed to continue traveling toward the spent fuel pool rotating about a line through the centerline of the crane drum.

The cask continues to swing until the kinetic energy is completely converted to potential energy (i.e. the cask raises up as it rotates about the crane drum). At the instant the cask swings as close to the spent fuel pool as possible, the cable breaks and the cask falls. The conclusion is that the cask falls on the edge of the spent fuel pool wall and falls away from the spent fuel pool due to its center of gravity being behind the wall.

See Sketch #1 for an illustration of this case.

Case #2 - The cask handling crane is assumed to be traveling at its maximum speed of 50 fpm and hits the crane stops nearest the spent fuel pool.

The crane stops and the cable breaks at the same instant, therefore the cask does not swing but is moving at 50 fpm. The cask is assumed to be at its highest position, which is approximately 4 feet off the floor. The distance the cask travels at 50 fpm in the time it takes fcr the cask to fall 4 feet is deter-mined and it is concluded that the cask will not hit the spent fuel pool wall but will fall directly into the cask pit. See Sketch #2 for an illustration of this case.

Case #3 - The cask is assumed to be over the edge of the cask pit wall and the cable breaks. The cask either drops on the edge of the wall or the cask is lowered on to the edge of the wall.

Either case gives the same initial conditions because in the event of a drop the kinetic energy is assumed to be absorbed by the cask's bottom energy absorber, as stated in the Safety Analysis Report for the cask.

Therefore, the cask's potential energy will cause the cask to tip toward the spent fuel pool wall.

Energy losses at impact with the spent fuel pool wall are conservatively considered and the results of the analysis show that the remaining energy is not sufficient to cause the cask to fall into the spent fuel pool.

See Sketch #3 for an illus-tration of this case.

Cask Drop Analysis, con't.

In order to provide additional assurance that the cask will not fall into the spent fuel pool, the path of the cask will be controlled by application of administrative control as shown on Sketch #4. By requiring the cask to follow this path, the circumatances of Case #3 cannot occur and any potential for the cask falling into the spent fuel pool is negated.

_._.7.___..

4. Crane Drum ral Crane Against 6 tops II

/

i I

I I

w

-_-g i

I O

I I

i

'y sN ruck Cask - Model No. NFS-4 T

v I

I o

I i

-s 1

I ro I

I I

I I

I pe#

,I _

_ _I i

i i 'l I

i 1

1 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I 1

I l

1

__1, i

i i

I t-___.___._._J I

y i

  • .4 Cask Pit Foci Pool 7

h -0*

t i

- - __- G ___ 7 (- G_ _..... __6__0_,

W 6 KETCH *

.i I

1 i

i

.1 1

f.

I 1.

l

'NTruck Cask - Model No.NFS-4 L

r---

- 'i i

l I

_.J u

I i

l l

I

_j_43 j._

l l

i I

i i

l I

t i

i g_.

l i

i i

I i

I I

a i

i 1

I i

9 l

l

-e r'-l -- - -- 5 i

i I

i u

L____.

_ _.1

... e....,

Cask Pit l

r Fuci Pool

,TO 5'

4'- Co i

4'-ro

_ 5- 0

z

=,_.

=

SKETCH

  • 2.

i i

l I

i i

l j

Truck Cask - Model No. NFS-4 i

I j -

1 I

I I

I I

l1 Water Jocket Gyp.)

l I

- t-O 'g I

i l

I I

I I

I I

'/

I l

/'/

l l

l l

I l

,M

/

/'

I i

/

/

\\/f A

/

/i

,\\,...,.

/

/

/

m*

Cask PH Fuel Pool TO b'- O _'

\\

N N

N

\\

N N

\\

\\

s N

N N

O max 4/

N N

s s

N l

'N

/

N I

Q s

.-I_--_._'

w s

g

's g

_I

'h l

\\

\\

r

,3.+.

. e f.,

,.Q. N l

g s

N

\\

x N

Caek PR c

'x

~

x q.o

, s..o -

~

Fuel Pool SKE.TC H

  • 3

51 n

i

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ _ f, E d reme of Man bk I

l I

h I

H I

Z l

y

,Y I

a I

o N

I 7-c, -_ o y

p m

i TO I

m i

t I

I l

F S

I e

C a

I o

o-1 50 a

O l

c Cask Pit i

o Feel Pool.

a i

i 2

4-1 1

I d

l J

l x4 I

1j l

J 4 i

o a

i O

m5 I

D E3

\\

l N

g$

(

I o

d*

^'

9 m

m i

e3 Lk

~

N

)'

I r

Y Ad i

.#-L lI 49 1

0 J