ML19269C350
| ML19269C350 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wood River Junction |
| Issue date: | 01/16/1979 |
| From: | Crow W NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Bowers C UNITED NUCLEAR CORP. (SUBS. OF UNC, INC.) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7902010336 | |
| Download: ML19269C350 (2) | |
Text
.
4*o$
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION gy 7
1
/
UNITED STATES y*
34 -
.,j
- * ^
~~~
- ' WASHINGTON,0.C.20565
- N,,. #
3 v
JAN 161979
.;,_ c; FCPF:RLS
~
^ ~~
~~
70-820 SNM-777, Amendment No. 7 4
.y.
... m..
United Nuclear Corporation ATTN: Mr. C. E. Bowers, General Manager Fuel Recovery Operations Wood River Junction, Rhode Island 02894 n.
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your application of December 12,1978, as supplemented December 22, 1978, and pursuant to Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 70, Special Nuclear Material License No. SNM-777 is hereby amended to authorize the planned shutdown of ventilation equipment as described in Subsection 404 of your license. Attached is a revised page 6A of the effective page list, which replaces page 6A dated November 22, 1978.
All other conditions of this license shall remain the same.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION D
l' i
W. T. Crow, Section Leader Uranium Fuel Fabrication Section Fuel Processing & Fabrication Branch Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety
Attachment:
Page 6A of Effective Pages SNM-777 79020103 %
6A EFFECTIVE PAGES SNM-777 DOCKET 70-820 SECTION 400 Issue Subsection Subject
~~
Page
'Date Table of Contents - Health Physics 1 of 1 Not datedl Standards 401 Ge seral Health Physics Requirements
,1 of 2 09/01/75 s._.
2 of 2 09/01/75 402 Personnel Monitoring 1 of 4 01/17/75 2 of 4 05/22/72 3 of 4 05/22/72 4 of 4 05/22/72 403 Respiratory Protection 1 of 2 10/31/68 2 of 2 10/31/68 Table 403-I 1 of 2 10/31/68 2 of 2 10/31/68 404 Facility and Equipment Requirements 1 of 3 12/12/78 (Transmitted by letter dtd 12/22/78) + la of 3 12/12/78 2 of 3 05/22/72 3 of 3 12/31/74 405 Instrumentation 1 of 3 10/31/68 2 of 3 10/31/68 3 of 3 10/31/68 Health Physics Evaluation-Nuclear 1 of 1 10/31/68 Alarm System Coverage 406 Surveillance 1 of 3 03/19/71 2 of 3 01/17/75 3 of 3 Not datedl 407 Airborne & Liquid Effluent Monitoring i
Not datedl 407.1 Airborne Effluent 1
10/27/78 407.1 Airborne & Liquid Effluent Monitoring 2
Not datedl 407.1 Sketch 407.1-I Exhaust Stack Locations No pg. #
Not datedl I Should be dated 05/12/78, was transmitted by letter dated 05/12/78.
ENCLOSURE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED 1.
Please submit information on concentrations (radiological and non-radiological) of environmental samples including air, water (surface and ground) soil and vegetation collected for the calendar years 1975,1976,1977 and 1978.
2.
What would be the projected quantity of radioactivity discharged at the site pond overflow and the sanitary discharge due to' the increased throughput?
3.
Please describe the gaseous effluent monitoring program for radiological and non-radiological effluents in the new stacks resulting from the expansion. Also provide the action levels for radiological and non-radiological emissions and the actions that will be taken if these levels are exceeded.
4.
Please provide a plan and a schedule for the decontamination and decoamissioning of the existing on-site retention ponds.
5.
Please provide the action levels for radiological contaminants in liquid effluents at the site pond overflow and the actions that will be taken if these levels are reached or exceeded.
(The action level and the appropriate action should be justified utilizing the ALARA concept).
6.
Please list the uranium compounds released in the gaseous and liquid effluents and an estimate of the fraction of each uranium compound in the total release.
7.
Please provide current information of potential flooding of Joachim Creek based on the Corps of Engineers current study on the flood plains of certain Jefferson County rivers and creeks. Also include an analysis on the environmental impact associated with a potential flooding of the site.
8.
Please provide justification, with an analysis supported by experimental data if possible, that the proposed disposition of the spent limestone has a negligible short or long term environmental impact.